A) Burden of proof B) Presumption C) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above D) Presumption
A) Secondary Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Sur-rebuttal Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will object because the testimony is hearsay D) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law E) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only
A) judicial admission B) judicial confession C) extra-judicial confession D) admission E) judicial admission
A) they are judicial admission B) they are judicial confession C) they are extrajudicial admission D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are extra judicial confession
A) res gestae B) dying declaration C) declaration against interest D) common reputation E) res gestae
A) cumulative evidence B) corroborative evidence C) direct evidence D) positive evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) extra-judicial admission B) judicial confession C) judicial confession D) judicial admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. B) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners C) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively D) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. E) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively
A) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence B) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged C) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case D) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case E) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case
A) Onus Probandi B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Presumption Juris et de Jure D) Presumption Juris Tantum E) Burden of Proof
A) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule B) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule C) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule D) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule E) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule
A) When he is criminology graduate B) When he is a Questioned document examiner C) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. D) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. E) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing.
A) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. B) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. C) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. D) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. E) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged
A) Leading question B) Misleading question C) Maliciousquestion D) Answer E) Leading question
A) Preponderanceofevidence B) Preponderanceofevidence C) None of the above D) All of the above E) Substantial evidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun D) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun E) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test
A) Substantial Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Object Evidence E) Documentary Evidence
A) It was B who survived B) It was A who died first C) It was B who died last D) It was A who survived E) It was A who survived
A) X died a head of W B) X died a head of W C) Both died at the same time D) W died ahead of X E) X died after W
A) Prima facie Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Prima facie Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) voidable B) unacceptable C) incompetent D) irrelevant E) incompetent
A) The defense will conduct the direct examination B) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination C) The defense will conduct the cross-examination D) The defense will conduct the direct examination E) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination
A) testimonial evidence B) documentary evidence C) oral evidence D) object evidence E) documentary evidence
A) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation E) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication
A) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule B) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication C) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae D) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest E) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule
A) Corroborative Evidence B) Negative Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay B) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation C) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation D) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. E) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias
A) Secondary Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Implied Admission D) Express Admission E) Express Admission
A) marital privilege communication rule B) marital privilege communication rule C) hearsay evidence rule D) marital privilege disqualification rule E) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule
A) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination B) Direct examination C) Cross-examination D) Direct examination
A) Direct Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Relevant Evidence D) Material Evidence E) Material Evidence
A) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death B) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify C) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death D) he declarant survives E) he declarant survives
A) it is circumstantial evidence B) it is a dying declaration C) it is a dying declaration D) It is hearsay E) It is corroborative evidence
A) Estoppel in pais B) Estoppel by deed C) None of the above D) Estoppel in pais E) Estoppel by lashes
A) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case B) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm C) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case D) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict E) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped
A) Object evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Prima Facie Evidence D) Competent Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court B) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule C) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule D) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication E) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule
A) written agreements B) testimonial C) objects D) written agreements E) documents
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Positive Evidence E) Testimonial Evidence
A) Administrative penalties B) Ethical conduct of lawyers C) Substantive rights of parties D) Manner of enforcing criminal law E) Civil actions for damages
A) Protect only the victim B) Avoid police investigations C) Punish the accused immediately D) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished E) Prolong the trial process
A) Issuance of a subpoena B) Decision of the judge C) Filing of a complaint or information D) Arrest of the accused E) Trial commencement
A) The prosecutor B) The accused C) The offended party or any peace officer D) The judge E) The defense lawyer
A) The judge B) The police investigator C) The complainant D) The accused E) The prosecutor
A) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense B) The nationality of the accused C) The type of evidence presented D) The amount of damages claimed E) The place of arrest
A) At all stages of the criminal process B) Only during trial C) After conviction D) Only when he requests for it E) Only during arraignment
A) During preliminary investigation B) Only in the prosecutor’s office C) In the police station D) In private E) In open court
A) Decided by the police B) A negotiation between judge and witness C) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense D) The same as arraignment E) Forbidden in criminal law
A) Dismiss the case B) Immediately convict him C) Conduct a searching inquiry D) Issue a warrant E) Refer to mediation
A) The judge B) The mayor C) The police chief D) The prosecutor E) The complainant
A) Confession B) Fine C) Guarantee for appearance in court D) Punishment E) Civil indemnity
A) The accused cannot delay trial B) The prosecution must drop weak cases C) No postponement is allowed D) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay E) Trial must be finished in one day
A) The accused is tried twice for the same offense B) The court changes the charge C) There are two informations filed D) The prosecution presents two witnesses E) The accused appeals his case
A) The sufficiency of evidence to file information B) The jurisdiction of the court C) The sentence to be imposed D) The guilt of the accused E) The civil damages
A) The prosecutor B) The accused C) The complainant’s lawyer D) The judge E) The defense
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Probable cause C) Clear and convincing evidence D) Substantial evidence E) Preponderance of evidence
A) Execution of judgment B) Issuance of warrant of arrest C) Appeal D) Conviction E) Filing of complaint
A) Character evidence is always allowed B) All evidence is admissible C) Only hearsay is excluded D) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible E) Confessions can be forced
A) Based on what another person told the witness B) Always admissible C) From an expert opinion D) Derived from physical evidence E) Based on the witness’s own knowledge
A) The accused was previously convicted of another offense B) The facts charged do not constitute an offense C) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form D) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused E) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so
A) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea B) Refer the case to the Supreme Court C) Immediately impose sentence D) Dismiss the case E) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability
A) Execute a written testimony B) Remain in detention C) Appear in court and testify D) Pay a fine to the court E) Produce documents or objects for inspection
A) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents B) The court decides which evidence is best C) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity D) Testimonies are better than written evidence E) Secondary evidence may always be admitted
A) By clear and convincing evidence B) Beyond reasonable doubt C) By credible testimony D) By probable cause E) By a preponderance of evidence
A) Written statements or documents B) Audio recordings C) Testimony given by witnesses under oath D) Objects used in the commission of the crime E) Expert opinion submitted to the court
A) The right to appeal B) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel C) The right to bail D) The right to speedy disposition of cases E) The right to be free from double jeopardy
A) Lack of probable cause B) Demurrer to evidence C) Double jeopardy D) Rebuttal testimony E) Improper venue
A) The body of the victim only B) The penalty imposed by law C) The person of the accused D) The confession of the suspect E) The facts proving that a crime has been committed
A) Allow secret testimonies B) Simplify cross-examination C) Avoid written evidence D) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits E) Remove the need for witnesses
A) The case is transferred to another court B) The decision is void C) The case is reopened automatically D) The decision can still be appealed E) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed
A) Filing of the affidavit B) Order of the prosecutor C) Motion of the complainant D) Finding of probable cause by the judge E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness B) Evidence approved by the court C) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest D) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure E) Evidence submitted by the defense
A) Bail is a security for the release of an accused B) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case C) Bail may be posted only by the police D) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint E) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC
A) Being convicted twice of different offenses B) Being arrested by two police units C) Being acquitted and later convicted D) Being tried in two different courts E) Being tried twice for the same offense
A) Civil cases involving government officials B) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office C) Administrative cases of government employees D) All criminal cases E) Election-related crimes
A) Libel cases B) Drug-related cases C) Estafa cases D) Traffic violations E) Trespassing cases
A) Suspend the prosecutor B) Proceed with trial C) Appoint a public attorney D) Dismiss the case E) Issue a warrant of arrest
A) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness B) Questioning by the defense C) Questioning by the judge D) Leading questions by any party E) Cross-examination of witnesses
A) Used only by expert witnesses B) Allowed during direct examination C) Allowed during cross-examination D) Required in re-direct examination E) Prohibited during all examinations
A) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness B) Support the testimony of one’s own witness C) Summarize all testimonies D) Present new evidence E) Introduce exhibits
A) Expert Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) secondary evidence rule B) testimonial knowledge rule C) parol evidence rule D) documentary evidence rule E) secondary evidence rule
A) res inter alios acta rule B) testimonial knowledge rule C) res inter alios acta rule D) dying declaration E) res gestae rule
A) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" B) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan E) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father
A) material evidence B) corroborative evidence C) material evidence D) relevant evidence E) substantial evidence
A) Presumption B) Burden of proof C) Conclusive presumption D) Presumption E) Burden of Evidence
A) it is a declaration against interest B) it is considered part of the res gestae C) it is considered a dying declaration L D) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae E) it is extrajudicial confession
A) real evidence B) corroborative evidence C) demonstrative evidence D) cumulative evidence E) demonstrative evidence
A) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates B) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only C) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites
A) leading B) stupid C) misleading D) hearsay E) leading
A) Burden of proof B) Burden of evidence C) None of the above D) Burden of evidence E) presumption
A) B'sdeath is indispensable B) B's wound must be fatal C) The declaration must be written D) B and A must have argument and has grudges E) B'sdeath is indispensable
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of proof C) Presumptions D) Burden of proof E) None of the above
A) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule D) The Rules of Summary Procedure E) The Rule of Court Testimony
A) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court B) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court C) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court D) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court E) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court
A) Conclusive Evidence B) SecondaryEvidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) Real Evidence
A) Primary evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Best evidence D) Conclusive evidence E) Conclusive evidence
A) best evidence B) Corroborative C) excluded by law D) excluded by law E) Admissible
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Positive Evidence D) Testimonial Evidence E) Cumulative Evidence |