A) Empirical theory B) Traditional theory C) Positivist theory D) Classical theory
A) Felonies under the Revised Penal Code B) Mala in se crimes C) Crimes under special laws D) Mala prohibita crimes
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) Acts and omissions defined as crimes C) Acts and omissions punishable by law D) All of these.
A) Proximate cause B) Motive C) Intent D) Mens rea
A) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime. B) Yes, X is liable for the death of X even if he had no intention of inflicting upon him a more serious harm because a person is liable or a felony even if the wrongful act be different from that intended. C) Yes, x is still liable for the death of Y because X was irked. D) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime.
A) None of these. B) Expand the law or congressional act. C) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. B) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. C) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Exactions B) Tax C) Taxes D) Bills
A) Yes aggravating without warrant B) (Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating C) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) All of these are correct. B) None of the above. C) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Romance B) Intention C) Intent D) Motive
A) None of these. B) 'An act done by me against my will is not my act" C) 'An act of a man cannot be ascribed to another man.' D) 'An act of a man is his very own act.'
A) By the criminal tendency of a person. B) By the prior acts of a person. C) By the overt acts of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) French rule B) English rule C) American rule D) British rule
A) Mens rea B) Intent C) Motive D) Criminal design
A) People power B) Police power C) Power of expropriation D) Presidential Power
A) Com. Act No. B) P.D. No. C) BatasBlg.
A) Batas Blg. B) P.D. No. C) Com. Act No. D) Act No.
A) Act No. B) Com. Act No. C) Batas Blg. D) P.D. No.
A) Batas Blg. 3815 B) Act No. 3815 C) P.D. No. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Law No. D) R.A. No.
A) X may raise lack of intent as a defense. B) X may raise intense fear as a defense. C) All of these. D) X may raise mistake of fact as a defense.
A) None of these. B) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism.
A) Intent B) Imprudence
A) Murder B) Homicide C) Manslaughter D) Impossible crime
A) Tradition theory B) Classical theory C) Positivist theory D) Empirical theory
A) Territorial B) Jurisdctional C) Juristic D) Traditional
A) X will be for pickpocketing because he has criminal tendency. B) X will be liable for his ill motive. C) X will be liable for an impossible crime and will be punished for his criminal propensity. D) X will have no criminal liability because he cannot be a theft of his own wallet.
A) It means that the law be just. B) None of these. C) It means that laws be lenient. D) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly.
A) Mala prohibita crimes B) Those provided for by the Revised PenalCode C) Special penal laws D) Mala in se crimes
A) Mistake of fact B) Error in personae C) Error in identify D) Mistake of target
A) Yes, because X was aiming at a different person. B) Yes, because a person committing a felony is liable for any result therefrom. C) Yes, because a felony is always a felony. D) Yes, because there is criminal intent to kill.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) X may not be liable because his wife may not file a case anymore. B) X is not liable because it is against public policy to charge a husband. C) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. D) None of these.
A) Violent strike B) Praeter intentionem C) Excess of force D) None of these.
A) Culpable felonies B) Mala prohibita C) Probable felonies D) Mala in se
A) British rule B) English rule C) European rule D) American rule
A) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Power of eminent domain B) Power of taxation C) None of these. D) Power of Expropriation
A) Freedom B) Intent C) Intelligence D) Lack of foresight
A) Mens rea B) Intent C) Criminal design D) Motive
A) German rule B) American rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) Mala in se B) Mala probihita C) Culpable felonies |