A) Traditional theory B) Classical theory C) Empirical theory D) Positivist theory
A) Felonies under the Revised Penal Code B) Mala prohibita crimes C) Mala in se crimes D) Crimes under special laws
A) Acts and omissions punishable by law B) All of these. C) Acts and omissions defined as crimes D) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) Proximate cause B) Intent C) Motive D) Mens rea
A) Yes, X is liable for the death of X even if he had no intention of inflicting upon him a more serious harm because a person is liable or a felony even if the wrongful act be different from that intended. B) Yes, x is still liable for the death of Y because X was irked. C) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime. D) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime.
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) None of these. D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Tax B) Taxes C) Exactions D) Bills
A) Parricide because the victim was his own father. B) (Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating C) Yes aggravating without warrant
A) None of the above. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. C) All of these are correct.
A) Intent B) Intention C) Motive D) Romance
A) 'An act of a man cannot be ascribed to another man.' B) 'An act of a man is his very own act.' C) 'An act done by me against my will is not my act" D) None of these.
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the criminal tendency of a person. C) By the overt acts of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) French rule B) English rule C) American rule D) British rule
A) Intent B) Motive C) Mens rea D) Criminal design
A) Power of expropriation B) Presidential Power C) People power D) Police power
A) BatasBlg. B) Com. Act No. C) P.D. No.
A) P.D. No. B) Batas Blg. C) Com. Act No. D) Act No.
A) Com. Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Batas Blg. D) Act No.
A) Batas Blg. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) P.D. No. 3815 D) Act No. 3815
A) Law No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) P.D. No.
A) X may raise lack of intent as a defense. B) X may raise mistake of fact as a defense. C) All of these. D) X may raise intense fear as a defense.
A) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. B) None of these.
A) Intent B) Imprudence
A) Manslaughter B) Homicide C) Impossible crime D) Murder
A) Tradition theory B) Empirical theory C) Positivist theory D) Classical theory
A) Traditional B) Juristic C) Jurisdctional D) Territorial
A) X will be liable for his ill motive. B) X will have no criminal liability because he cannot be a theft of his own wallet. C) X will be liable for an impossible crime and will be punished for his criminal propensity. D) X will be for pickpocketing because he has criminal tendency.
A) None of these. B) It means that the law be just. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Those provided for by the Revised PenalCode B) Special penal laws C) Mala prohibita crimes D) Mala in se crimes
A) Mistake of target B) Error in identify C) Error in personae D) Mistake of fact
A) Yes, because a person committing a felony is liable for any result therefrom. B) Yes, because there is criminal intent to kill. C) Yes, because X was aiming at a different person. D) Yes, because a felony is always a felony.
A) Jan. 1, 1930 B) Jan. 1, 1931 C) Jan. 1, 1932 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. B) X is not liable because it is against public policy to charge a husband. C) None of these. D) X may not be liable because his wife may not file a case anymore.
A) Excess of force B) Violent strike C) Praeter intentionem D) None of these.
A) Mala in se B) Probable felonies C) Mala prohibita D) Culpable felonies
A) British rule B) English rule C) European rule D) American rule
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. C) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these. C) Power of Expropriation D) Power of eminent domain
A) Intent B) Freedom C) Intelligence D) Lack of foresight
A) Intent B) Motive C) Mens rea D) Criminal design
A) English rule B) British rule C) American rule D) German rule
A) Culpable felonies B) Mala probihita C) Mala in se |