A) Classical theory B) Traditional theory C) Positivist theory D) Empirical theory
A) Mala in se crimes B) Mala prohibita crimes C) Felonies under the Revised Penal Code D) Crimes under special laws
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by law C) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code D) Acts and omissions defined as crimes
A) Proximate cause B) Motive C) Mens rea D) Intent
A) Yes, X is liable for the death of X even if he had no intention of inflicting upon him a more serious harm because a person is liable or a felony even if the wrongful act be different from that intended. B) Yes, x is still liable for the death of Y because X was irked. C) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime. D) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime.
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. D) None of these.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. C) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. D) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Bills B) Exactions C) Tax D) Taxes
A) Parricide because the victim was his own father. B) (Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating C) Yes aggravating without warrant
A) None of the above. B) All of these are correct. C) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Intention B) Romance C) Intent D) Motive
A) 'An act of a man is his very own act.' B) 'An act done by me against my will is not my act" C) None of these. D) 'An act of a man cannot be ascribed to another man.'
A) By the criminal mind of the person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the prior acts of a person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) American rule B) British rule C) French rule D) English rule
A) Criminal design B) Mens rea C) Intent D) Motive
A) People power B) Police power C) Presidential Power D) Power of expropriation
A) Com. Act No. B) P.D. No. C) BatasBlg.
A) Com. Act No. B) Batas Blg. C) P.D. No. D) Act No.
A) Com. Act No. B) Act No. C) Batas Blg. D) P.D. No.
A) Act No. 3815 B) P.D. No. 3815 C) Batas Blg. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Law No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) R.A. No.
A) X may raise lack of intent as a defense. B) X may raise intense fear as a defense. C) X may raise mistake of fact as a defense. D) All of these.
A) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. B) None of these.
A) Imprudence B) Intent
A) Impossible crime B) Manslaughter C) Homicide D) Murder
A) Classical theory B) Tradition theory C) Empirical theory D) Positivist theory
A) Jurisdctional B) Territorial C) Traditional D) Juristic
A) X will be liable for an impossible crime and will be punished for his criminal propensity. B) X will be for pickpocketing because he has criminal tendency. C) X will have no criminal liability because he cannot be a theft of his own wallet. D) X will be liable for his ill motive.
A) It means that the law be just. B) It means that laws be lenient. C) None of these. D) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly.
A) Those provided for by the Revised PenalCode B) Special penal laws C) Mala in se crimes D) Mala prohibita crimes
A) Error in personae B) Mistake of fact C) Mistake of target D) Error in identify
A) Yes, because there is criminal intent to kill. B) Yes, because a person committing a felony is liable for any result therefrom. C) Yes, because X was aiming at a different person. D) Yes, because a felony is always a felony.
A) Jan. 1, 1931 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1933 D) Jan. 1, 1932
A) X may not be liable because his wife may not file a case anymore. B) None of these. C) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. D) X is not liable because it is against public policy to charge a husband.
A) Excess of force B) Praeter intentionem C) None of these. D) Violent strike
A) Mala in se B) Culpable felonies C) Probable felonies D) Mala prohibita
A) European rule B) British rule C) English rule D) American rule
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. D) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.
A) None of these. B) Power of eminent domain C) Power of taxation D) Power of Expropriation
A) Lack of foresight B) Intelligence C) Intent D) Freedom
A) Mens rea B) Criminal design C) Motive D) Intent
A) American rule B) British rule C) German rule D) English rule
A) Mala in se B) Culpable felonies C) Mala probihita |