A) Interrogation B) Elicitation C) Cross-examination D) Interview
A) Both are the same under Philippine law. B) An interrogation is done before arrest; interview after arrest. C) An interrogation seeks to obtain admissions or confessions; an interview gathers information. D) An interview is accusatory, while interrogation is neutral
A) Logical approach B) Coercive technique C) Direct approach D) Emotional appeal
A) Right against unreasonable search B) Right to bail C) Right to privacy D) Right against self-incrimination
A) Before the barangay captain B) Under oath and notarized C) In writing and in the presence of a police officer D) Voluntarily, intelligently, and with counsel
A) Miranda Doctrine B) Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine C) Rule on res gestae D) Chain of custody rule
A) To shorten the process of interrogation B) To ensure that confessions are voluntary and informed C) To protect the investigator from liability D) To make the suspect feel guilty
A) Admission B) Confession C) Dying declaration D) Res gestae
A) The statement was in writing. B) The declarant was under police custody C) The declarant believed death was imminent. D) The declaration was made before a lawyer
A) Doctrine of dying declaration B) Doctrine of finality C) Rule of Res Gestae D) Principle of truthfulness
A) Admissions B) Independent relevant statements C) Confessions D) Res gestae
A) A witness’ excited utterance during the crime B) A doctor’s report describing injuries C) A suspect’s confession to police D) . A bystander’s remark identifying the victim’s assailant
A) It was made without counsel B) It was made after prolonged questioning C) It was made in private D) It was written in English
A) Cognitive interview B) Coercive interview C) Investigative interview D) Structured interview
A) Create a timeline B) Recall events from different perspectives C) Confess guilt D) Guess what happened
A) Made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently with counsel present B) Signed before an ordinary witness C) Taken under oath in a barangay hearing D) Made before a prosecutor without counsel
A) Inadmissible B) Conditional C) Partially admissible D) Admissible
A) An admission relates to the whole offense; a confession only to parts. B) An admission is an acknowledgment of fact; a confession is acknowledgment of guilt. C) A confession is made before arrest; an admission after. D) They are synonymous in criminal law
A) The number of witnesses B) The presence of counsel and voluntariness C) The seriousness of the crime D) The investigator’s experience
A) Continue the questioning B) Stop the interrogation immediately C) Use persuasion D) Detain the suspect longer
A) Cross-Examination Approach B) Structured Interview C) Narrative Method D) Cognitive Interview
A) Silence technique B) Theme development C) Repetition technique D) Emotional appeal
A) Interview is accusatory; interrogation is non-accusatory B) Interview is for witnesses; interrogation for complainants C) Interview is conducted before arrest; interrogation after arrest D) Interview is conducted privately; interrogation publicly
A) The confession is considered involuntary and inadmissible B) The confession may be admitted if written and signed C) The confession can still be admitted with corroboration D) The confession remains admissible
A) It must be in writing B) It must be made with the assistance of counsel C) It must be expressed and categorical D) It must be voluntary
A) Only the part identifying the assailant is admissible B) The entire statement is admissible if made under a belief of impending death C) It is inadmissible unless recorded by a police officer D) The whole statement is inadmissible for lack of formality
A) Admissible only if corroborated by physical evidence B) Inadmissible for being originally obtained in violation of constitutional rights C) Admissible because it was later confirmed D) Admissible if the suspect signed a waiver
A) Part of res gestae B) Dying declaration C) Independent relevant statement D) Admission
A) Voluntariness and legality B) Materiality and spontaneity C) Necessity and trustworthiness D) Opportunity and impartiality
A) Qualified admission B) Tacit confession C) Judicial admission D) Extrajudicial confession
A) Deception invalidates all statements B) Deception may be used if it does not induce false confession C) Deception is prohibited under all circumstances D) Deception requires approval from a prosecutor
A) Dying declaration B) Admission against interest C) Confession D) Res gestae statement
A) Voluntary admission B) Valid under implied waiver doctrine C) Coerced confession D) Admissible due to continuous questioning
A) To obtain a confession B) test the validity of gathered evidence C) To elicit truth about participation in a crime D) To intimidate the suspect into cooperating
A) Hearsay B) Admission C) Confession D) Independent relevant statement
A) The declarant must identify the killer in the statement B) The declaration must be in written form C) The declarant must believe death is inevitable D) The declarant must die immediately after the statement
A) Admissible only as corroborative evidence B) Valid if re-affirmed later C) Inadmissible for being involuntary D) Admissible because counsel was present
A) Investigative visualization B) Hypnosis technique C) Cognitive interviewing D) Narrative reconstruction
A) Admissible in full B) Inadmissible due to constitutional violation C) Admissible as corroborative evidence D) Admissible only in part
A) Inadmissible hearsay B) Confession C) Admission against interest D) Dying declaration
A) Admissible if the suspect voluntarily talked B) Admissible if reduced into writing and signed freely C) Inadmissible for lack of counsel during questioning D) Valid if the suspect signed a waiver before a barangay official
A) Question-and-answer phase B) Termination phase C) Preparation phase D) Approach phase
A) Structured, ethical, and non-coercive questioning B) Extracting confession through pressure C) Use of psychological manipulation D) Rapid confessional tactics
A) Presenting evidence to elicit a truthful reaction B) Encouraging voluntary cooperation C) Using intimidation or threat to induce confession D) Allowing the suspect to narrate his version freely
A) Physical pressure B) Deception and bluffing C) Emotional appeal and sympathy D) Logical reasoning and factual inconsistencies
A) Cognitive interrogation B) Preliminary interview C) Cross-examination D) Investigative debriefing
A) Admissible in evidence B) Inadmissible for being post-consultation C) Considered res gestae D) Inadmissible unless signed by two witnesses
A) Intimidate the suspect to confess B) Gather information without accusation C) Determine guilt beyond reasonable doubt D) Obtain physical evidence
A) The declarant must be under oath B) The declarant must identify the killer C) The statement must be recorded by a police investigator D) The declaration must concern the cause or circumstances of death
A) Admission B) Confession C) Res gestae D) Independent relevant statement
A) The use or threat of violence or intimidation B) The intent to gain C) The number of offenders D) The value of the property stolen
A) Tracing the stolen property B) Securing the crime scene and interviewing witnesses C) Conducting a background check on the victim D) Filing the case immediately
A) Evidence collection B) Suspect profiling C) Crime scene reconstruction D) Intelligence gathering
A) Estafa involves deceit or abuse of confidence; theft does not. B) Estafa occurs only in corporate settings. C) Theft requires a written contract; estafa does not D) Theft requires intent to gain; estafa does not.
A) Written or electronic proof of deceit or fraudulent transaction B) Property inventory C) CCTV footage D) Confession of the accused
A) Carnapping B) Robbery C) Estafa D) Qualified theft
A) Only when the vehicle is sold illegally B) With violence or intimidation only C) Without violence but with intent to gain D) With or without the owner’s consent, with intent to gain
A) Reclusion perpetua to death B) Death by lethal injection C) Life imprisonment D) Reclusion temporal
A) Trace ownership and vehicle identity B) Identify the manufacturer C) Locate the driver D) Determine insurance status
A) Only those who steal cars B) Those who deal in stolen property knowing it was stolen C) Those who report stolen property D) Those who physically steal property
A) The ownership of the property B) The absence of intent to gain C) The act of concealing the property D) The act of possession rather than the act of taking
A) Sales invoice B) Insurance policy C) Certificate of Registration and Official Receipt (CR/OR) D) Driver’s license
A) The accused buys property from a store B) The accused possesses stolen property without satisfactory explanation C) The accused was seen near the crime scene D) The property is found hidden
A) Punish the original thief B) Prevent the circulation of stolen property in commerce C) Penalize accessory crimes of selling stolen goods D) Reduce robbery incidents
A) Payment of recruitment fees B) Use of minors in employment C) Recruitment for legal overseas work D) Exploitation through force, fraud, or coercion
A) Decriminalizing illegal recruitment B) Limiting jurisdiction to the Philippines only C) Including internet-facilitated trafficking and accessory liability D) Allowing voluntary prostitution
A) Increasing fines B) Reducing penalties for traffickers C) Limiting law enforcement authority D) Strengthening prosecution and extraterritorial jurisdiction
A) Media exposure B) Aggressive interrogation C) Protection and rehabilitation of victims D) Immediate deportation
A) Forced labor B) Adoption following legal procedures C) Debt bondage D) Exploitation of prostitution
A) Structuring B) Layering C) Integration D) Placement
A) Investing clean money B) Depositing the proceeds C) Moving funds through various accounts to hide origin D) Reporting suspicious transactions
A) The launderer deposits cash in small amounts B) Authorities freeze the assets C) The launderer hides the funds abroad D) The launderer mixes illicit funds with legitimate businesses
A) Encourage secret banking B) Allow anonymous foreign accounts C) Prevent the financial system from being used for criminal proceeds D) Regulate pawnshops
A) Charitable organizations B) Non-reporting entities C) Covered persons under AMLA D) Exempt institutions
A) Suspicious transaction B) Covered transaction C) Layered transaction D) Threshold transaction
A) Administrative offense only B) No liability if unintentional C) A criminal violation under AMLA D) Gross negligence
A) Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) B) Department of Justice C) Securities and Exchange Commission D) Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
A) Identifying the victim’s negligence B) Checking bank accounts C) Locating stolen property and proving intent to gain D) Establishing the suspect’s income
A) Conducting digital forensics B) Identifying use of force or intimidation and weapon evidence C) Studying the suspect’s financial background D) Recovery of stolen property only
A) Suspect’s criminal record B) Modus operandi and deceit pattern C) The victim’s wealth D) Place of transaction only
A) Administrative sanction B) Presumption of involvement in the crime C) No consequence D) Forfeiture of insurance claims
A) Estafa B) Carnapping C) Theft D) Fencing
A) The account is new B) The depositor is a senior citizen C) The account balance is low D) The transaction is legal but complex or unusual
A) News reports B) Witness interviews C) Bank advertisements D) Paper and digital transaction audit
A) Political influence B) Lack of police equipment C) International cooperation and evidence tracing D) Media pressure
A) Robbery B) Carnapping C) Estafa D) Theft
A) Presence or absence of violence or intimidation B) The monetary value of the property stolen C) Relationship between victim and offender D) Use of deception or false pretenses
A) Vehicle tracing system B) Physical evidence collection at the scene C) Financial and documentary audit D) Property recovery operation
A) Physical evidence like weapons or fingerprints B) Computer logs and online records C) Vehicle registration documents D) Documentary and bank receipts
A) Eyewitness testimony B) DNA evidence C) Documentary evidence proving deceit and damage D) Physical evidence at the crime scene
A) When the owner reports the loss B) When the offender takes possession without consent of the owner C) When the vehicle is sold to another person D) When the vehicle leaves the city or province
A) Simple carnapping B) Qualified carnapping C) Robbery D) Theft
A) Amount of profit derived from the property B) Personal relationship between the thief and the fence C) Knowledge or reasonable presumption that the item was stolen D) Ownership of stolen property by the fence
A) Estafa B) Fencing C) Innocent purchase D) Theft by negligence
A) Surveillance of illegal recruitment activities B) Collection of firearms evidence C) Accounting audit of business operations D) Vehicle tracing through LTO database
A) Recruitment of minors under 18 years old B) Employment abroad C) The use of force, coercion, or deception for exploitation D) Violation of labor regulations
A) R.A. 10364 B) R.A. 10883 C) P.D. 1612 D) R.A. 9208
A) Reclassification of all victims as offenders B) Non-deportation of foreign victims C) Immunity of recruiters D) Repatriation without consent
A) Concealment B) Placement C) Integration D) Layering
A) Placement B) Layering C) Integration D) Structuring |