- 1. One Person, No Vote by Carol Anderson is a powerful and insightful examination of the systemic disenfranchisement faced by Black Americans in the United States, particularly focusing on the historical and contemporary implications of voter suppression. Anderson meticulously traces the evolution of voting rights, highlighting the persistent barriers erected in the post-Civil War era, such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and more recent legislative efforts aimed at restricting access to the ballot. Through a compelling narrative, she underscores the critical importance of voting as a fundamental right and a cornerstone of democracy, while also shedding light on the resilience and activism of those who have fought against these injustices. Anderson's work not only serves as a call to action for preserving voting rights but also invites readers to reflect on the ongoing struggle for equality and representation in the face of adversity, emphasizing that the fight for one person's vote enriches and protects the entire democratic process.
What is the central argument of Carol Anderson's 'One Person, No Vote'?
A) Voter suppression is a deliberate political strategy targeting minority voters
B) All American voters face equal voting difficulties
C) Voting rights have consistently expanded throughout US history
D) Voter fraud is the primary threat to American democracy
- 2. Which Supreme Court decision does Anderson identify as enabling modern voter suppression?
A) Roe v. Wade (1973)
B) Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
C) Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
D) Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
- 3. What legislation did the Shelby County decision effectively gut?
A) The 15th Amendment
B) The 19th Amendment
C) The Voting Rights Act of 1965
D) The Civil Rights Act of 1964
- 4. How does Anderson characterize the relationship between voter suppression and gerrymandering?
A) They work together to dilute minority voting power
B) They are unrelated political phenomena
C) Voter suppression prevents gerrymandering
D) Gerrymandering helps combat voter suppression
- 5. What historical period does Anderson compare contemporary voter suppression to?
A) World War II era
B) Progressive Era
C) Jim Crow era
D) Revolutionary War period
- 6. Which government-issued ID do many African Americans lack according to Anderson's research?
A) Social Security card
B) Driver's license
C) Birth certificate
D) Passport
- 7. What is the stated justification that suppression advocates use for strict voter ID laws?
A) Increasing voter turnout
B) Reducing election costs
C) Preventing voter fraud
D) Simplifying voting process
- 8. How does Anderson describe the impact of felony disenfranchisement laws?
A) They disproportionately affect African American communities
B) They have been eliminated in most states
C) They affect all racial groups equally
D) They primarily impact white voters
- 9. How does Anderson frame the stakes of voter suppression for American democracy?
A) Inevitable feature of all democracies
B) Minor administrative issue
C) Existential threat to democratic legitimacy
D) Temporary political problem
|