A) A lane for jogging. B) A lane for parking bicycles. C) A designated lane on the road for cyclists. D) A lane for scooters.
A) A type of bike race. B) A low-traffic street that prioritizes bicycle traffic. C) A bike-sharing program. D) A bike rental shop.
A) The sound of bike bells. B) Bicycle clothing. C) Bike accessories like helmets and locks. D) The network of facilities that support biking such as paths, lanes, and racks.
A) A bike lane separated from the road by physical barriers. B) A track for motor racing. C) A track for cycling races. D) A circular path for biking practices.
A) They do not have any traffic signals. B) They are cheaper to build than regular bike lanes. C) They physically separate cyclists from motor vehicle traffic. D) They are narrower than regular bike lanes.
A) It encourages speeding on bicycles. B) It increases pollution. C) It provides secure locations to park bicycles at destinations. D) It prevents people from biking.
A) To give cyclists their own signals at intersections. B) To signal for emergency bike repairs. C) To communicate between cyclists. D) To alert pedestrians.
A) To sell bicycles. B) To organize bike races. C) To provide parking and secure storage for bicycles. D) To repair bicycles.
A) A competition for bikers. B) A box to store bicycles. C) An area at the front of an intersection designated for cyclists to wait for the light to change. D) A box filled with bike accessories.
A) Ottawa, Canada B) New York, USA C) Montreal, Canada D) San Francisco, USA
A) AASHTO Guide to Bikeway Facilities B) Sustrans Design Manual C) MUTCD D) The Tekenen voor de fiets design manual
A) Greenway B) Shared use path C) Bikeway D) Segregated cycling facility
A) Bike lane B) Sharrow C) Advisory bike lane D) Cycle track
A) Contraflow bike lane B) Buffered bike lane C) Sharrow D) Cycle track
A) Buffered bike lane B) Shared use path C) Cycle track D) Bicycle boulevard
A) Shared use path B) Segregated cycling facility C) Greenway D) Bikeway
A) Segregated cycling facility B) Multi-use path C) Bikeway D) Shared-use footway
A) Copenhagen B) Amsterdam C) Bogota D) New York City
A) 20% B) 50%+ C) 70% D) 30%
A) Road diets have no effect on crash frequencies. B) They result in a significant increase in crash severity. C) Crash frequencies were 6% lower after installation. D) Crash frequencies increased significantly.
A) 20 million Danish kroner B) 13.4 million Danish kroner C) 8 million euros D) 10 million euros
A) Adding more stop signs for cyclists B) Removing bike lanes C) Building overpasses only for cars D) Junction treatment
A) Thameslink B) CrossCountry C) Eurostar D) GWR (Great Western Railway)
A) 28%. B) 75%. C) 10%. D) 50%.
A) Germany B) Netherlands C) France D) Denmark
A) 44% B) 17% C) 25% D) 30%
A) Netherlands B) Denmark C) Japan D) Germany
A) 20% B) 60% C) 10% D) Around 40%
A) 2020 B) 2017 C) 2012 D) 2004
A) A case-control study in 2021 B) A 2019 study C) A 2021 review D) A 2023 EU report
A) Limited to city centers only B) Free use without subscription C) Only available to residents D) Subscription basis
A) 100 km B) 84 km C) 120 km D) 50 km
A) London B) Paris C) Berlin D) Madrid
A) Service stations with air pumps B) Bike repair shops C) Water fountains D) Rest areas with seating
A) Groningen B) Amsterdam C) Rotterdam D) Delft
A) Uppsala B) Stockholm C) Malmo D) Gothenburg
A) Netherlands B) United States C) Germany D) New Zealand
A) Shared lane markings B) Cycle tracks C) Bike boulevards D) Advisory Shoulders
A) Albertslund Path B) Breda-Etten-Leur Route C) RijnWaalpad D) C99
A) Germany. B) The Netherlands. C) Canada. D) France.
A) 30 km B) 10 km C) 25 km D) 17.5 km
A) 36% B) 10% C) 25% D) 50%
A) Eurostar B) Copenhagen S-tog C) Munich S-Bahn D) Rheinbahn in Düsseldorf |