- 1. In 'Justice for Hedgehogs', renowned legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin presents a profound examination of the interconnection between law, morality, and politics, advocating for the inherent dignity of individuals and the importance of justice in societal structures. Dworkin uses the metaphor of the hedgehog, which knows one big thing, to argue for a unified moral theory that emphasizes the significance of individual rights and the role of principles over mere rules. He critiques the traditional legal positivism which separates law from morality, positing instead that legal interpretation must be guided by moral principles that uphold justice. Throughout the book, Dworkin explores complex themes such as the nature of rights, the relevance of ethical considerations in legal discourse, and the idea of a collective morality that transcends partisan divides. His insightful reflections challenge readers to consider not only what the law is, but what it should aspire to be in reflecting the ethical values of a just society, positioning his arguments within a broader dialogue about integrity, equality, and the responsibilities of both individuals and institutions in pursuing justice.
What is the central thesis of Dworkin's 'Justice for Hedgehogs'?
A) Moral relativism is the only coherent position
B) Justice requires separate treatment for different species
C) Moral values are unified and objective
D) Legal positivism provides the best moral framework
- 2. What does Dworkin mean by 'interpretive concepts'?
A) Concepts that require constructive interpretation
B) Concepts with fixed dictionary definitions
C) Mathematical or logical concepts
D) Scientific empirical concepts
- 3. How does Dworkin view the relationship between law and morality?
A) Law and morality are completely separate
B) Law should always override moral considerations
C) Law is a branch of political morality
D) Morality is irrelevant to legal interpretation
- 4. What role does 'dignity' play in Dworkin's theory?
A) It applies only to human rights law
B) It is irrelevant to moral philosophy
C) It is a secondary consideration
D) It is the fundamental ethical value
- 5. What is Dworkin's view of value pluralism?
A) He thinks it applies only to aesthetics
B) He believes it supports moral relativism
C) He considers it the only viable position
D) He rejects it in favor of value unity
- 6. What methodological approach does Dworkin employ?
A) Pure logical deduction
B) Constructive interpretation
C) Empirical verification
D) Historical analysis only
- 7. What does Dworkin mean by 'living in good faith'?
A) Following religious doctrines strictly
B) Pursuing only personal happiness
C) Taking responsibility for one's values and actions
D) Obeying all laws without question
- 8. How does Dworkin characterize moral disagreements?
A) As irrelevant to moral philosophy
B) As substantive disagreements about objective truth
C) As proof that morality is subjective
D) As merely verbal misunderstandings
- 9. How does Dworkin approach the concept of human rights?
A) As religious concepts without secular meaning
B) As social constructions with no objective basis
C) As legal fictions created by courts
D) As fundamental requirements of dignity
|