- 1. In 'Justice for Hedgehogs', renowned legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin presents a profound examination of the interconnection between law, morality, and politics, advocating for the inherent dignity of individuals and the importance of justice in societal structures. Dworkin uses the metaphor of the hedgehog, which knows one big thing, to argue for a unified moral theory that emphasizes the significance of individual rights and the role of principles over mere rules. He critiques the traditional legal positivism which separates law from morality, positing instead that legal interpretation must be guided by moral principles that uphold justice. Throughout the book, Dworkin explores complex themes such as the nature of rights, the relevance of ethical considerations in legal discourse, and the idea of a collective morality that transcends partisan divides. His insightful reflections challenge readers to consider not only what the law is, but what it should aspire to be in reflecting the ethical values of a just society, positioning his arguments within a broader dialogue about integrity, equality, and the responsibilities of both individuals and institutions in pursuing justice.
What is the central thesis of Dworkin's 'Justice for Hedgehogs'?
A) Moral relativism is the only coherent position
B) Justice requires separate treatment for different species
C) Moral values are unified and objective
D) Legal positivism provides the best moral framework
- 2. What does Dworkin mean by 'interpretive concepts'?
A) Concepts with fixed dictionary definitions
B) Mathematical or logical concepts
C) Scientific empirical concepts
D) Concepts that require constructive interpretation
- 3. How does Dworkin view the relationship between law and morality?
A) Law should always override moral considerations
B) Law and morality are completely separate
C) Law is a branch of political morality
D) Morality is irrelevant to legal interpretation
- 4. What role does 'dignity' play in Dworkin's theory?
A) It is the fundamental ethical value
B) It applies only to human rights law
C) It is irrelevant to moral philosophy
D) It is a secondary consideration
- 5. What is Dworkin's view of value pluralism?
A) He thinks it applies only to aesthetics
B) He considers it the only viable position
C) He believes it supports moral relativism
D) He rejects it in favor of value unity
- 6. What methodological approach does Dworkin employ?
A) Pure logical deduction
B) Empirical verification
C) Historical analysis only
D) Constructive interpretation
- 7. What does Dworkin mean by 'living in good faith'?
A) Obeying all laws without question
B) Pursuing only personal happiness
C) Following religious doctrines strictly
D) Taking responsibility for one's values and actions
- 8. How does Dworkin characterize moral disagreements?
A) As irrelevant to moral philosophy
B) As merely verbal misunderstandings
C) As substantive disagreements about objective truth
D) As proof that morality is subjective
- 9. How does Dworkin approach the concept of human rights?
A) As fundamental requirements of dignity
B) As legal fictions created by courts
C) As religious concepts without secular meaning
D) As social constructions with no objective basis
|