A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Presumption C) Presumption D) Burden of proof
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Sur-rebuttal Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Secondary Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law D) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant E) I will object because the testimony is hearsay
A) extra-judicial confession B) judicial admission C) judicial confession D) admission E) judicial admission
A) they are extrajudicial admission B) they are extra judicial confession C) they are judicial admission D) they are judicial confession E) they are extra judicial confession
A) declaration against interest B) res gestae C) dying declaration D) common reputation E) res gestae
A) direct evidence B) positive evidence C) corroborative evidence D) cumulative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) judicial admission B) judicial confession C) extra-judicial admission D) extra-judicial confession E) judicial confession
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners C) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively D) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. E) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively.
A) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case B) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case E) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence
A) Burden of Proof B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Presumption Juris Tantum D) Presumption Juris et de Jure E) Onus Probandi
A) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule B) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule C) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule D) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule E) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule
A) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. B) When he is criminology graduate C) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. D) When he is a Questioned document examiner E) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity.
A) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. B) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. C) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged D) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Answer B) Maliciousquestion C) Leading question D) Misleading question E) Leading question
A) All of the above B) Preponderanceofevidence C) Substantial evidence D) Preponderanceofevidence E) None of the above
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime D) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites E) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test
A) Documentary Evidence B) Object Evidence C) Substantial Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) It was A who survived B) It was A who died first C) It was B who survived D) It was B who died last E) It was A who survived
A) X died a head of W B) X died a head of W C) W died ahead of X D) X died after W E) Both died at the same time
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Prima facie Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) incompetent B) voidable C) unacceptable D) irrelevant E) incompetent
A) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination B) The defense will conduct the direct examination C) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination D) The defense will conduct the direct examination E) The defense will conduct the cross-examination
A) documentary evidence B) object evidence C) oral evidence D) testimonial evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence B) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation C) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence D) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication E) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence
A) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule B) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication C) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest
A) Direct Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Corroborative Evidence E) Negative Evidence
A) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay D) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation E) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation
A) Testimonial Evidence B) Implied Admission C) Secondary Evidence D) Express Admission E) Express Admission
A) marital privilege communication rule B) marital privilege disqualification rule C) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule D) hearsay evidence rule E) marital privilege communication rule
A) Cross-examination B) Direct examination C) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination D) Direct examination
A) Direct Evidence B) Material Evidence C) Material Evidence D) Relevant Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death B) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death C) he declarant survives D) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify E) he declarant survives
A) It is corroborative evidence B) it is circumstantial evidence C) it is a dying declaration D) it is a dying declaration E) It is hearsay
A) Estoppel in pais B) Estoppel by lashes C) Estoppel by deed D) None of the above E) Estoppel in pais
A) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case B) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm C) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case D) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict E) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped
A) Competent Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Object evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Prima Facie Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule B) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule C) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court D) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication E) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule
A) written agreements B) testimonial C) objects D) documents E) written agreements
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Cumulative Evidence E) Positive Evidence
A) Administrative penalties B) Ethical conduct of lawyers C) Manner of enforcing criminal law D) Civil actions for damages E) Substantive rights of parties
A) Punish the accused immediately B) Protect only the victim C) Avoid police investigations D) Prolong the trial process E) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished
A) Arrest of the accused B) Trial commencement C) Decision of the judge D) Filing of a complaint or information E) Issuance of a subpoena
A) The judge B) The defense lawyer C) The offended party or any peace officer D) The prosecutor E) The accused
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The police investigator D) The complainant E) The accused
A) The nationality of the accused B) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense C) The type of evidence presented D) The place of arrest E) The amount of damages claimed
A) Only when he requests for it B) Only during arraignment C) After conviction D) Only during trial E) At all stages of the criminal process
A) In the police station B) In open court C) Only in the prosecutor’s office D) During preliminary investigation E) In private
A) Decided by the police B) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense C) A negotiation between judge and witness D) The same as arraignment E) Forbidden in criminal law
A) Dismiss the case B) Refer to mediation C) Conduct a searching inquiry D) Issue a warrant E) Immediately convict him
A) The judge B) The mayor C) The prosecutor D) The complainant E) The police chief
A) Civil indemnity B) Guarantee for appearance in court C) Confession D) Punishment E) Fine
A) The accused cannot delay trial B) Trial must be finished in one day C) No postponement is allowed D) The prosecution must drop weak cases E) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay
A) There are two informations filed B) The accused appeals his case C) The accused is tried twice for the same offense D) The prosecution presents two witnesses E) The court changes the charge
A) The jurisdiction of the court B) The guilt of the accused C) The sentence to be imposed D) The sufficiency of evidence to file information E) The civil damages
A) The accused B) The complainant’s lawyer C) The defense D) The prosecutor E) The judge
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Probable cause C) Clear and convincing evidence D) Preponderance of evidence E) Substantial evidence
A) Issuance of warrant of arrest B) Filing of complaint C) Appeal D) Conviction E) Execution of judgment
A) Character evidence is always allowed B) All evidence is admissible C) Only hearsay is excluded D) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible E) Confessions can be forced
A) Based on what another person told the witness B) Always admissible C) Based on the witness’s own knowledge D) Derived from physical evidence E) From an expert opinion
A) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form B) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so C) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused D) The facts charged do not constitute an offense E) The accused was previously convicted of another offense
A) Immediately impose sentence B) Dismiss the case C) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability D) Refer the case to the Supreme Court E) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea
A) Remain in detention B) Produce documents or objects for inspection C) Pay a fine to the court D) Execute a written testimony E) Appear in court and testify
A) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents B) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity C) The court decides which evidence is best D) Testimonies are better than written evidence E) Secondary evidence may always be admitted
A) Beyond reasonable doubt B) By credible testimony C) By probable cause D) By a preponderance of evidence E) By clear and convincing evidence
A) Expert opinion submitted to the court B) Audio recordings C) Objects used in the commission of the crime D) Testimony given by witnesses under oath E) Written statements or documents
A) The right to speedy disposition of cases B) The right to bail C) The right to appeal D) The right to be free from double jeopardy E) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel
A) Demurrer to evidence B) Improper venue C) Lack of probable cause D) Rebuttal testimony E) Double jeopardy
A) The body of the victim only B) The confession of the suspect C) The facts proving that a crime has been committed D) The person of the accused E) The penalty imposed by law
A) Simplify cross-examination B) Allow secret testimonies C) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits D) Remove the need for witnesses E) Avoid written evidence
A) The decision can still be appealed B) The case is transferred to another court C) The case is reopened automatically D) The decision is void E) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed
A) Filing of the affidavit B) Request of the police officer C) Order of the prosecutor D) Motion of the complainant E) Finding of probable cause by the judge
A) Evidence approved by the court B) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure C) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest D) Evidence submitted by the defense E) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness
A) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC B) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case C) Bail is a security for the release of an accused D) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint E) Bail may be posted only by the police
A) Being tried in two different courts B) Being acquitted and later convicted C) Being convicted twice of different offenses D) Being tried twice for the same offense E) Being arrested by two police units
A) Civil cases involving government officials B) Administrative cases of government employees C) All criminal cases D) Election-related crimes E) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office
A) Estafa cases B) Traffic violations C) Libel cases D) Trespassing cases E) Drug-related cases
A) Issue a warrant of arrest B) Suspend the prosecutor C) Appoint a public attorney D) Dismiss the case E) Proceed with trial
A) Leading questions by any party B) Questioning by the judge C) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness D) Questioning by the defense E) Cross-examination of witnesses
A) Prohibited during all examinations B) Required in re-direct examination C) Used only by expert witnesses D) Allowed during direct examination E) Allowed during cross-examination
A) Present new evidence B) Support the testimony of one’s own witness C) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness D) Summarize all testimonies E) Introduce exhibits
A) Direct Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) documentary evidence rule B) secondary evidence rule C) parol evidence rule D) testimonial knowledge rule E) secondary evidence rule
A) res inter alios acta rule B) res inter alios acta rule C) testimonial knowledge rule D) dying declaration E) res gestae rule
A) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father B) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" C) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father D) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan E) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father
A) material evidence B) corroborative evidence C) material evidence D) relevant evidence E) substantial evidence
A) Burden of Evidence B) Presumption C) Presumption D) Conclusive presumption E) Burden of proof
A) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae B) it is considered part of the res gestae C) it is considered a dying declaration L D) it is a declaration against interest E) it is extrajudicial confession
A) real evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) demonstrative evidence D) cumulative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only C) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates E) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites
A) hearsay B) leading C) stupid D) misleading E) leading
A) Burden of proof B) Burden of evidence C) None of the above D) presumption E) Burden of evidence
A) B'sdeath is indispensable B) B and A must have argument and has grudges C) The declaration must be written D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) B's wound must be fatal
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of proof C) Presumptions D) Burden of proof E) None of the above
A) The Rules of Summary Procedure B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule D) The Rule of Court Testimony E) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure
A) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court B) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court C) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court D) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court E) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Expert Evidence D) SecondaryEvidence E) Real Evidence
A) Primary evidence B) Best evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Conclusive evidence
A) excluded by law B) excluded by law C) Corroborative D) best evidence E) Admissible
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Positive Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Cumulative Evidence |