A) Presumption B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Secondary Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Sur-rebuttal Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only B) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law C) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will object because the testimony is hearsay
A) extra-judicial confession B) judicial admission C) admission D) judicial admission E) judicial confession
A) they are judicial confession B) they are judicial admission C) they are extra judicial confession D) they are extrajudicial admission E) they are extra judicial confession
A) res gestae B) declaration against interest C) dying declaration D) res gestae E) common reputation
A) corroborative evidence B) cumulative evidence C) direct evidence D) positive evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) judicial confession B) judicial admission C) judicial confession D) extra-judicial confession E) extra-judicial admission
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners C) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively D) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. E) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively.
A) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case B) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged C) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case D) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence E) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case
A) Presumption Juris et de Jure B) Burden of Proof C) Onus Probandi D) Presumption Juris Tantum E) Presumption Juris et de Jure
A) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule B) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule C) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule D) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule E) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule
A) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. B) When he is a Questioned document examiner C) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. D) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. E) When he is criminology graduate
A) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. B) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. C) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. D) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Maliciousquestion B) Leading question C) Misleading question D) Leading question E) Answer
A) Preponderanceofevidence B) Preponderanceofevidence C) Substantial evidence D) None of the above E) All of the above
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime B) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test C) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites D) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun
A) Direct Evidence B) Substantial Evidence C) Object Evidence D) Documentary Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) It was A who died first B) It was A who survived C) It was B who died last D) It was B who survived E) It was A who survived
A) X died after W B) W died ahead of X C) Both died at the same time D) X died a head of W E) X died a head of W
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Prima facie Evidence
A) unacceptable B) irrelevant C) incompetent D) incompetent E) voidable
A) The defense will conduct the direct examination B) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination C) The defense will conduct the direct examination D) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination E) The defense will conduct the cross-examination
A) oral evidence B) testimonial evidence C) documentary evidence D) object evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation B) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence E) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence
A) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest B) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication C) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Corroborative Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Negative Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. D) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias E) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay
A) Testimonial Evidence B) Implied Admission C) Secondary Evidence D) Express Admission E) Express Admission
A) marital privilege communication rule B) marital privilege communication rule C) hearsay evidence rule D) marital privilege disqualification rule E) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule
A) Cross-examination B) Direct examination C) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination D) Direct examination
A) Material Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Material Evidence D) Relevant Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death B) he declarant survives C) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify D) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death E) he declarant survives
A) it is circumstantial evidence B) it is a dying declaration C) It is hearsay D) it is a dying declaration E) It is corroborative evidence
A) Estoppel in pais B) None of the above C) Estoppel in pais D) Estoppel by deed E) Estoppel by lashes
A) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict B) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped C) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case D) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm E) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case
A) Competent Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Object evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Prima Facie Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule B) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court C) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication D) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule E) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule
A) written agreements B) testimonial C) objects D) documents E) written agreements
A) Positive Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Cumulative Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Civil actions for damages B) Administrative penalties C) Substantive rights of parties D) Ethical conduct of lawyers E) Manner of enforcing criminal law
A) Protect only the victim B) Avoid police investigations C) Prolong the trial process D) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished E) Punish the accused immediately
A) Trial commencement B) Decision of the judge C) Issuance of a subpoena D) Filing of a complaint or information E) Arrest of the accused
A) The accused B) The defense lawyer C) The prosecutor D) The judge E) The offended party or any peace officer
A) The complainant B) The police investigator C) The judge D) The prosecutor E) The accused
A) The amount of damages claimed B) The nationality of the accused C) The place of arrest D) The type of evidence presented E) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense
A) Only during arraignment B) After conviction C) Only when he requests for it D) Only during trial E) At all stages of the criminal process
A) During preliminary investigation B) In the police station C) In open court D) In private E) Only in the prosecutor’s office
A) A negotiation between judge and witness B) Decided by the police C) Forbidden in criminal law D) The same as arraignment E) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense
A) Issue a warrant B) Refer to mediation C) Immediately convict him D) Conduct a searching inquiry E) Dismiss the case
A) The mayor B) The complainant C) The police chief D) The prosecutor E) The judge
A) Guarantee for appearance in court B) Punishment C) Civil indemnity D) Confession E) Fine
A) No postponement is allowed B) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay C) The accused cannot delay trial D) The prosecution must drop weak cases E) Trial must be finished in one day
A) The court changes the charge B) There are two informations filed C) The accused is tried twice for the same offense D) The accused appeals his case E) The prosecution presents two witnesses
A) The guilt of the accused B) The sufficiency of evidence to file information C) The jurisdiction of the court D) The sentence to be imposed E) The civil damages
A) The prosecutor B) The accused C) The defense D) The judge E) The complainant’s lawyer
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Clear and convincing evidence C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Probable cause E) Substantial evidence
A) Issuance of warrant of arrest B) Appeal C) Execution of judgment D) Conviction E) Filing of complaint
A) Confessions can be forced B) All evidence is admissible C) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible D) Character evidence is always allowed E) Only hearsay is excluded
A) Based on what another person told the witness B) Always admissible C) From an expert opinion D) Based on the witness’s own knowledge E) Derived from physical evidence
A) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form B) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused C) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so D) The facts charged do not constitute an offense E) The accused was previously convicted of another offense
A) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea B) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability C) Dismiss the case D) Refer the case to the Supreme Court E) Immediately impose sentence
A) Produce documents or objects for inspection B) Appear in court and testify C) Pay a fine to the court D) Execute a written testimony E) Remain in detention
A) Testimonies are better than written evidence B) The court decides which evidence is best C) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents D) Secondary evidence may always be admitted E) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity
A) By credible testimony B) By clear and convincing evidence C) By probable cause D) Beyond reasonable doubt E) By a preponderance of evidence
A) Expert opinion submitted to the court B) Audio recordings C) Written statements or documents D) Objects used in the commission of the crime E) Testimony given by witnesses under oath
A) The right to bail B) The right to speedy disposition of cases C) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel D) The right to appeal E) The right to be free from double jeopardy
A) Rebuttal testimony B) Lack of probable cause C) Demurrer to evidence D) Double jeopardy E) Improper venue
A) The facts proving that a crime has been committed B) The person of the accused C) The confession of the suspect D) The body of the victim only E) The penalty imposed by law
A) Avoid written evidence B) Allow secret testimonies C) Simplify cross-examination D) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits E) Remove the need for witnesses
A) The decision can still be appealed B) The decision is void C) The case is transferred to another court D) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed E) The case is reopened automatically
A) Request of the police officer B) Finding of probable cause by the judge C) Motion of the complainant D) Order of the prosecutor E) Filing of the affidavit
A) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest B) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness C) Evidence approved by the court D) Evidence submitted by the defense E) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure
A) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC B) Bail is a security for the release of an accused C) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint D) Bail may be posted only by the police E) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case
A) Being tried in two different courts B) Being acquitted and later convicted C) Being tried twice for the same offense D) Being convicted twice of different offenses E) Being arrested by two police units
A) Civil cases involving government officials B) Election-related crimes C) All criminal cases D) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office E) Administrative cases of government employees
A) Drug-related cases B) Trespassing cases C) Libel cases D) Estafa cases E) Traffic violations
A) Proceed with trial B) Appoint a public attorney C) Issue a warrant of arrest D) Suspend the prosecutor E) Dismiss the case
A) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness B) Leading questions by any party C) Questioning by the judge D) Questioning by the defense E) Cross-examination of witnesses
A) Used only by expert witnesses B) Prohibited during all examinations C) Allowed during cross-examination D) Required in re-direct examination E) Allowed during direct examination
A) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness B) Present new evidence C) Summarize all testimonies D) Introduce exhibits E) Support the testimony of one’s own witness
A) Direct Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) documentary evidence rule C) secondary evidence rule D) secondary evidence rule E) parol evidence rule
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) res inter alios acta rule C) res inter alios acta rule D) res gestae rule E) dying declaration
A) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" B) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father E) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan
A) corroborative evidence B) material evidence C) material evidence D) relevant evidence E) substantial evidence
A) Presumption B) Burden of Evidence C) Presumption D) Burden of proof E) Conclusive presumption
A) it is considered part of the res gestae B) it is extrajudicial confession C) it is a declaration against interest D) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae E) it is considered a dying declaration L
A) demonstrative evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) cumulative evidence D) corroborative evidence E) real evidence
A) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only B) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates
A) stupid B) leading C) leading D) hearsay E) misleading
A) None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Burden of evidence D) Burden of evidence E) presumption
A) B and A must have argument and has grudges B) B'sdeath is indispensable C) B'sdeath is indispensable D) The declaration must be written E) B's wound must be fatal
A) Burden of proof B) Burden of evidence C) Burden of proof D) Presumptions E) None of the above
A) The Rule of Court Testimony B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure D) The Rules of Summary Procedure E) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule
A) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court B) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court C) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court D) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court E) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court
A) Expert Evidence B) Real Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) SecondaryEvidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) Primary evidence B) Best evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Conclusive evidence
A) excluded by law B) Admissible C) excluded by law D) best evidence E) Corroborative
A) Cumulative Evidence B) Positive Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence |