A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Presumption
A) Sur-rebuttal Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Secondary Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant
A) judicial admission B) extra-judicial confession C) judicial confession D) admission E) judicial admission
A) they are judicial admission B) they are judicial confession C) they are extrajudicial admission D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are extra judicial confession
A) declaration against interest B) common reputation C) res gestae D) dying declaration E) res gestae
A) corroborative evidence B) direct evidence C) cumulative evidence D) positive evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) judicial confession B) judicial confession C) extra-judicial confession D) judicial admission E) extra-judicial admission
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively C) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. D) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. E) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners
A) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case B) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence E) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged
A) Presumption Juris Tantum B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Onus Probandi D) Presumption Juris et de Jure E) Burden of Proof
A) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule B) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule C) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule D) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule E) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule
A) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. B) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. C) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. D) When he is criminology graduate E) When he is a Questioned document examiner
A) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. B) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. C) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged D) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Misleading question B) Maliciousquestion C) Leading question D) Answer E) Leading question
A) Substantial evidence B) Preponderanceofevidence C) All of the above D) None of the above E) Preponderanceofevidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime B) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun D) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun E) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test
A) Substantial Evidence B) Object Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Documentary Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) It was B who died last B) It was A who survived C) It was A who survived D) It was A who died first E) It was B who survived
A) W died ahead of X B) X died after W C) X died a head of W D) X died a head of W E) Both died at the same time
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Prima facie Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) incompetent B) irrelevant C) voidable D) incompetent E) unacceptable
A) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination B) The defense will conduct the cross-examination C) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination D) The defense will conduct the direct examination E) The defense will conduct the direct examination
A) object evidence B) documentary evidence C) testimonial evidence D) oral evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence E) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication
A) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule B) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest C) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication
A) Direct Evidence B) Negative Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Corroborative Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. D) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation E) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias
A) Secondary Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Express Admission D) Implied Admission E) Express Admission
A) marital privilege communication rule B) marital privilege disqualification rule C) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule D) marital privilege communication rule E) hearsay evidence rule
A) Direct examination B) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination C) Cross-examination D) Direct examination
A) Material Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Relevant Evidence E) Material Evidence
A) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death B) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death C) he declarant survives D) he declarant survives E) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify
A) it is a dying declaration B) It is corroborative evidence C) it is a dying declaration D) It is hearsay E) it is circumstantial evidence
A) Estoppel by lashes B) Estoppel in pais C) Estoppel in pais D) None of the above E) Estoppel by deed
A) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case B) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped C) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict D) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm E) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case
A) Competent Evidence B) Object evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Prima Facie Evidence
A) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court B) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule C) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication D) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule E) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule
A) testimonial B) written agreements C) documents D) objects E) written agreements
A) Cumulative Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Positive Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Administrative penalties B) Civil actions for damages C) Substantive rights of parties D) Ethical conduct of lawyers E) Manner of enforcing criminal law
A) Protect only the victim B) Punish the accused immediately C) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished D) Avoid police investigations E) Prolong the trial process
A) Filing of a complaint or information B) Arrest of the accused C) Decision of the judge D) Issuance of a subpoena E) Trial commencement
A) The defense lawyer B) The prosecutor C) The accused D) The judge E) The offended party or any peace officer
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The police investigator D) The accused E) The complainant
A) The amount of damages claimed B) The type of evidence presented C) The nationality of the accused D) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense E) The place of arrest
A) Only during arraignment B) Only when he requests for it C) At all stages of the criminal process D) After conviction E) Only during trial
A) In the police station B) During preliminary investigation C) In open court D) In private E) Only in the prosecutor’s office
A) Decided by the police B) The same as arraignment C) A negotiation between judge and witness D) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense E) Forbidden in criminal law
A) Issue a warrant B) Immediately convict him C) Refer to mediation D) Conduct a searching inquiry E) Dismiss the case
A) The complainant B) The prosecutor C) The police chief D) The mayor E) The judge
A) Guarantee for appearance in court B) Punishment C) Civil indemnity D) Fine E) Confession
A) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay B) The accused cannot delay trial C) The prosecution must drop weak cases D) No postponement is allowed E) Trial must be finished in one day
A) The accused appeals his case B) The court changes the charge C) There are two informations filed D) The prosecution presents two witnesses E) The accused is tried twice for the same offense
A) The sufficiency of evidence to file information B) The jurisdiction of the court C) The sentence to be imposed D) The guilt of the accused E) The civil damages
A) The defense B) The accused C) The prosecutor D) The complainant’s lawyer E) The judge
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Probable cause C) Clear and convincing evidence D) Substantial evidence E) Preponderance of evidence
A) Filing of complaint B) Issuance of warrant of arrest C) Appeal D) Execution of judgment E) Conviction
A) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible B) Only hearsay is excluded C) Confessions can be forced D) All evidence is admissible E) Character evidence is always allowed
A) From an expert opinion B) Based on what another person told the witness C) Derived from physical evidence D) Always admissible E) Based on the witness’s own knowledge
A) The accused was previously convicted of another offense B) The facts charged do not constitute an offense C) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so D) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused E) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form
A) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability B) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea C) Dismiss the case D) Refer the case to the Supreme Court E) Immediately impose sentence
A) Pay a fine to the court B) Appear in court and testify C) Execute a written testimony D) Remain in detention E) Produce documents or objects for inspection
A) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents B) Testimonies are better than written evidence C) The court decides which evidence is best D) Secondary evidence may always be admitted E) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity
A) Beyond reasonable doubt B) By credible testimony C) By probable cause D) By a preponderance of evidence E) By clear and convincing evidence
A) Audio recordings B) Expert opinion submitted to the court C) Testimony given by witnesses under oath D) Objects used in the commission of the crime E) Written statements or documents
A) The right to appeal B) The right to bail C) The right to be free from double jeopardy D) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel E) The right to speedy disposition of cases
A) Demurrer to evidence B) Lack of probable cause C) Improper venue D) Double jeopardy E) Rebuttal testimony
A) The person of the accused B) The penalty imposed by law C) The facts proving that a crime has been committed D) The body of the victim only E) The confession of the suspect
A) Avoid written evidence B) Remove the need for witnesses C) Simplify cross-examination D) Allow secret testimonies E) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits
A) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed B) The case is reopened automatically C) The decision can still be appealed D) The decision is void E) The case is transferred to another court
A) Motion of the complainant B) Finding of probable cause by the judge C) Order of the prosecutor D) Filing of the affidavit E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest B) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure C) Evidence approved by the court D) Evidence submitted by the defense E) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness
A) Bail is a security for the release of an accused B) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC C) Bail may be posted only by the police D) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case E) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint
A) Being tried twice for the same offense B) Being arrested by two police units C) Being tried in two different courts D) Being convicted twice of different offenses E) Being acquitted and later convicted
A) All criminal cases B) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office C) Civil cases involving government officials D) Election-related crimes E) Administrative cases of government employees
A) Traffic violations B) Libel cases C) Estafa cases D) Drug-related cases E) Trespassing cases
A) Appoint a public attorney B) Proceed with trial C) Dismiss the case D) Suspend the prosecutor E) Issue a warrant of arrest
A) Leading questions by any party B) Questioning by the defense C) Cross-examination of witnesses D) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness E) Questioning by the judge
A) Used only by expert witnesses B) Required in re-direct examination C) Allowed during direct examination D) Allowed during cross-examination E) Prohibited during all examinations
A) Support the testimony of one’s own witness B) Summarize all testimonies C) Present new evidence D) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness E) Introduce exhibits
A) Direct Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) Circumstantial Evidence
A) parol evidence rule B) secondary evidence rule C) testimonial knowledge rule D) documentary evidence rule E) secondary evidence rule
A) res gestae rule B) res inter alios acta rule C) testimonial knowledge rule D) dying declaration E) res inter alios acta rule
A) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" B) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father E) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan
A) material evidence B) material evidence C) relevant evidence D) substantial evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) Burden of proof B) Burden of Evidence C) Presumption D) Presumption E) Conclusive presumption
A) it is extrajudicial confession B) it is considered a dying declaration L C) it is a declaration against interest D) it is considered part of the res gestae E) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae
A) cumulative evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) real evidence E) demonstrative evidence
A) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates D) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only E) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites
A) leading B) hearsay C) stupid D) misleading E) leading
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of evidence C) Burden of proof D) presumption E) None of the above
A) B and A must have argument and has grudges B) B'sdeath is indispensable C) The declaration must be written D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) B's wound must be fatal
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of proof C) Burden of proof D) Presumptions E) None of the above
A) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure B) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule C) The Rules of Summary Procedure D) The Rules of Summary Procedure E) The Rule of Court Testimony
A) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court B) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court C) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court D) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court E) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court
A) Real Evidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) SecondaryEvidence
A) Best evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Primary evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Conclusive evidence
A) excluded by law B) excluded by law C) best evidence D) Admissible E) Corroborative
A) Cumulative Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Positive Evidence E) Testimonial Evidence |