A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Presumption C) Burden of proof D) Presumption
A) Sur-rebuttal Evidence B) Secondary Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only
A) judicial confession B) judicial admission C) extra-judicial confession D) judicial admission E) admission
A) they are extrajudicial admission B) they are extra judicial confession C) they are extra judicial confession D) they are judicial confession E) they are judicial admission
A) res gestae B) dying declaration C) res gestae D) declaration against interest E) common reputation
A) direct evidence B) corroborative evidence C) positive evidence D) cumulative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) extra-judicial confession B) judicial confession C) judicial admission D) judicial confession E) extra-judicial admission
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. C) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners D) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. E) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively
A) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case B) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case C) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence D) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged E) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case
A) Presumption Juris et de Jure B) Burden of Proof C) Onus Probandi D) Presumption Juris Tantum E) Presumption Juris et de Jure
A) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule B) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule C) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule D) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule E) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule
A) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. B) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. C) When he is criminology graduate D) When he is a Questioned document examiner E) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity.
A) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. B) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. C) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. D) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. E) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged
A) Leading question B) Misleading question C) Answer D) Leading question E) Maliciousquestion
A) All of the above B) Preponderanceofevidence C) None of the above D) Preponderanceofevidence E) Substantial evidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime D) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun
A) Documentary Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Object Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Substantial Evidence
A) It was B who survived B) It was A who survived C) It was A who died first D) It was A who survived E) It was B who died last
A) W died ahead of X B) X died after W C) Both died at the same time D) X died a head of W E) X died a head of W
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Prima facie Evidence E) Prima facie Evidence
A) irrelevant B) voidable C) incompetent D) unacceptable E) incompetent
A) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination B) The defense will conduct the cross-examination C) The defense will conduct the direct examination D) The defense will conduct the direct examination E) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination
A) object evidence B) documentary evidence C) oral evidence D) testimonial evidence E) documentary evidence
A) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication D) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation E) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence
A) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae B) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest C) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication
A) Direct Evidence B) Negative Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Corroborative Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. D) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias E) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation
A) Express Admission B) Express Admission C) Secondary Evidence D) Implied Admission E) Testimonial Evidence
A) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule B) marital privilege communication rule C) marital privilege disqualification rule D) marital privilege communication rule E) hearsay evidence rule
A) Direct examination B) Cross-examination C) Direct examination D) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination
A) Relevant Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Material Evidence D) Material Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death B) he declarant survives C) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death D) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify E) he declarant survives
A) It is hearsay B) it is a dying declaration C) it is circumstantial evidence D) it is a dying declaration E) It is corroborative evidence
A) Estoppel by deed B) Estoppel in pais C) Estoppel in pais D) None of the above E) Estoppel by lashes
A) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict B) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case C) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped D) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm E) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case
A) Competent Evidence B) Prima Facie Evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Object evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication B) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court C) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule D) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule E) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule
A) objects B) written agreements C) written agreements D) documents E) testimonial
A) Positive Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Testimonial Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Administrative penalties B) Manner of enforcing criminal law C) Substantive rights of parties D) Ethical conduct of lawyers E) Civil actions for damages
A) Avoid police investigations B) Protect only the victim C) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished D) Punish the accused immediately E) Prolong the trial process
A) Decision of the judge B) Issuance of a subpoena C) Trial commencement D) Arrest of the accused E) Filing of a complaint or information
A) The prosecutor B) The offended party or any peace officer C) The judge D) The defense lawyer E) The accused
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The police investigator D) The complainant E) The accused
A) The nationality of the accused B) The type of evidence presented C) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense D) The place of arrest E) The amount of damages claimed
A) After conviction B) At all stages of the criminal process C) Only during trial D) Only during arraignment E) Only when he requests for it
A) In the police station B) Only in the prosecutor’s office C) During preliminary investigation D) In private E) In open court
A) A negotiation between judge and witness B) Decided by the police C) The same as arraignment D) Forbidden in criminal law E) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense
A) Immediately convict him B) Dismiss the case C) Conduct a searching inquiry D) Issue a warrant E) Refer to mediation
A) The mayor B) The police chief C) The judge D) The complainant E) The prosecutor
A) Fine B) Civil indemnity C) Confession D) Guarantee for appearance in court E) Punishment
A) Trial must be finished in one day B) No postponement is allowed C) The accused cannot delay trial D) The prosecution must drop weak cases E) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay
A) There are two informations filed B) The accused is tried twice for the same offense C) The court changes the charge D) The prosecution presents two witnesses E) The accused appeals his case
A) The sufficiency of evidence to file information B) The guilt of the accused C) The jurisdiction of the court D) The sentence to be imposed E) The civil damages
A) The accused B) The defense C) The complainant’s lawyer D) The prosecutor E) The judge
A) Substantial evidence B) Clear and convincing evidence C) Preponderance of evidence D) Probable cause E) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) Execution of judgment B) Filing of complaint C) Conviction D) Appeal E) Issuance of warrant of arrest
A) All evidence is admissible B) Confessions can be forced C) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible D) Character evidence is always allowed E) Only hearsay is excluded
A) From an expert opinion B) Based on the witness’s own knowledge C) Always admissible D) Derived from physical evidence E) Based on what another person told the witness
A) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form B) The facts charged do not constitute an offense C) The accused was previously convicted of another offense D) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused E) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so
A) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability B) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea C) Refer the case to the Supreme Court D) Immediately impose sentence E) Dismiss the case
A) Execute a written testimony B) Remain in detention C) Pay a fine to the court D) Produce documents or objects for inspection E) Appear in court and testify
A) The court decides which evidence is best B) Testimonies are better than written evidence C) Secondary evidence may always be admitted D) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity E) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents
A) By credible testimony B) By a preponderance of evidence C) Beyond reasonable doubt D) By probable cause E) By clear and convincing evidence
A) Audio recordings B) Testimony given by witnesses under oath C) Expert opinion submitted to the court D) Written statements or documents E) Objects used in the commission of the crime
A) The right to be free from double jeopardy B) The right to appeal C) The right to speedy disposition of cases D) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel E) The right to bail
A) Improper venue B) Demurrer to evidence C) Rebuttal testimony D) Lack of probable cause E) Double jeopardy
A) The person of the accused B) The facts proving that a crime has been committed C) The confession of the suspect D) The penalty imposed by law E) The body of the victim only
A) Allow secret testimonies B) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits C) Remove the need for witnesses D) Simplify cross-examination E) Avoid written evidence
A) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed B) The decision is void C) The case is reopened automatically D) The case is transferred to another court E) The decision can still be appealed
A) Order of the prosecutor B) Motion of the complainant C) Finding of probable cause by the judge D) Filing of the affidavit E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest B) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness C) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure D) Evidence submitted by the defense E) Evidence approved by the court
A) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC B) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case C) Bail may be posted only by the police D) Bail is a security for the release of an accused E) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint
A) Being tried in two different courts B) Being acquitted and later convicted C) Being convicted twice of different offenses D) Being arrested by two police units E) Being tried twice for the same offense
A) All criminal cases B) Election-related crimes C) Administrative cases of government employees D) Civil cases involving government officials E) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office
A) Traffic violations B) Libel cases C) Trespassing cases D) Drug-related cases E) Estafa cases
A) Dismiss the case B) Appoint a public attorney C) Suspend the prosecutor D) Issue a warrant of arrest E) Proceed with trial
A) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness B) Questioning by the defense C) Leading questions by any party D) Cross-examination of witnesses E) Questioning by the judge
A) Allowed during direct examination B) Allowed during cross-examination C) Required in re-direct examination D) Prohibited during all examinations E) Used only by expert witnesses
A) Present new evidence B) Introduce exhibits C) Support the testimony of one’s own witness D) Summarize all testimonies E) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness
A) Direct Evidence B) Expert Evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Circumstantial Evidence
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) documentary evidence rule C) parol evidence rule D) secondary evidence rule E) secondary evidence rule
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) dying declaration C) res inter alios acta rule D) res inter alios acta rule E) res gestae rule
A) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father B) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan C) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father D) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" E) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father
A) relevant evidence B) corroborative evidence C) substantial evidence D) material evidence E) material evidence
A) Burden of Evidence B) Presumption C) Presumption D) Conclusive presumption E) Burden of proof
A) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae B) it is a declaration against interest C) it is considered part of the res gestae D) it is considered a dying declaration L E) it is extrajudicial confession
A) real evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) cumulative evidence D) demonstrative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates D) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only
A) stupid B) leading C) leading D) hearsay E) misleading
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of proof C) None of the above D) Burden of evidence E) presumption
A) B's wound must be fatal B) B and A must have argument and has grudges C) B'sdeath is indispensable D) The declaration must be written E) B'sdeath is indispensable
A) None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Burden of proof D) Presumptions E) Burden of evidence
A) The Rules of Summary Procedure B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule D) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure E) The Rule of Court Testimony
A) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court B) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court C) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court D) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court E) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court
A) Conclusive Evidence B) SecondaryEvidence C) Real Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) Conclusive evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Best evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Primary evidence
A) best evidence B) excluded by law C) Admissible D) Corroborative E) excluded by law
A) Cumulative Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Positive Evidence |