A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Presumption C) Burden of proof D) Presumption
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Secondary Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Sur-rebuttal Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only D) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law E) I will object because the testimony is hearsay
A) admission B) judicial admission C) judicial admission D) judicial confession E) extra-judicial confession
A) they are extra judicial confession B) they are extra judicial confession C) they are extrajudicial admission D) they are judicial admission E) they are judicial confession
A) common reputation B) res gestae C) res gestae D) declaration against interest E) dying declaration
A) positive evidence B) corroborative evidence C) direct evidence D) cumulative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) judicial confession B) extra-judicial admission C) judicial confession D) judicial admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners B) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively C) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. D) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively E) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively.
A) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence B) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case E) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged
A) Presumption Juris et de Jure B) Presumption Juris Tantum C) Presumption Juris et de Jure D) Onus Probandi E) Burden of Proof
A) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule B) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule C) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule D) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule E) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule
A) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. B) When he is a Questioned document examiner C) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. D) When he is criminology graduate E) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity.
A) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. B) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. C) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged D) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Maliciousquestion B) Leading question C) Misleading question D) Leading question E) Answer
A) Preponderanceofevidence B) All of the above C) Preponderanceofevidence D) None of the above E) Substantial evidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun C) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites D) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime E) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test
A) Substantial Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Documentary Evidence D) Object Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) It was A who survived B) It was B who survived C) It was A who died first D) It was A who survived E) It was B who died last
A) W died ahead of X B) X died after W C) Both died at the same time D) X died a head of W E) X died a head of W
A) Prima facie Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Prima facie Evidence
A) incompetent B) unacceptable C) incompetent D) irrelevant E) voidable
A) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination B) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination C) The defense will conduct the direct examination D) The defense will conduct the cross-examination E) The defense will conduct the direct examination
A) documentary evidence B) documentary evidence C) object evidence D) testimonial evidence E) oral evidence
A) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence B) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence E) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation
A) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule B) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule C) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest D) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication E) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae
A) Negative Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Corroborative Evidence
A) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay C) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation D) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias E) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation
A) Express Admission B) Testimonial Evidence C) Express Admission D) Secondary Evidence E) Implied Admission
A) hearsay evidence rule B) marital privilege communication rule C) marital privilege disqualification rule D) marital privilege communication rule E) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule
A) Direct examination B) Direct examination C) Cross-examination D) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Relevant Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Material Evidence E) Material Evidence
A) he declarant survives B) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death C) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death D) he declarant survives E) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify
A) it is circumstantial evidence B) It is hearsay C) it is a dying declaration D) it is a dying declaration E) It is corroborative evidence
A) Estoppel in pais B) Estoppel by lashes C) Estoppel in pais D) None of the above E) Estoppel by deed
A) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict B) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case C) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped D) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm E) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case
A) Competent Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Object evidence D) Prima Facie Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication B) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule C) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court D) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule E) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule
A) written agreements B) testimonial C) objects D) written agreements E) documents
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Positive Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Cumulative Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Administrative penalties B) Substantive rights of parties C) Civil actions for damages D) Ethical conduct of lawyers E) Manner of enforcing criminal law
A) Prolong the trial process B) Punish the accused immediately C) Protect only the victim D) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished E) Avoid police investigations
A) Filing of a complaint or information B) Issuance of a subpoena C) Trial commencement D) Arrest of the accused E) Decision of the judge
A) The judge B) The prosecutor C) The accused D) The offended party or any peace officer E) The defense lawyer
A) The complainant B) The accused C) The police investigator D) The judge E) The prosecutor
A) The nationality of the accused B) The amount of damages claimed C) The type of evidence presented D) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense E) The place of arrest
A) Only during trial B) Only during arraignment C) At all stages of the criminal process D) After conviction E) Only when he requests for it
A) During preliminary investigation B) In the police station C) Only in the prosecutor’s office D) In private E) In open court
A) The same as arraignment B) A negotiation between judge and witness C) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense D) Decided by the police E) Forbidden in criminal law
A) Refer to mediation B) Immediately convict him C) Issue a warrant D) Dismiss the case E) Conduct a searching inquiry
A) The mayor B) The judge C) The police chief D) The complainant E) The prosecutor
A) Civil indemnity B) Fine C) Punishment D) Guarantee for appearance in court E) Confession
A) The accused cannot delay trial B) Trial must be finished in one day C) No postponement is allowed D) The prosecution must drop weak cases E) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay
A) There are two informations filed B) The accused appeals his case C) The accused is tried twice for the same offense D) The court changes the charge E) The prosecution presents two witnesses
A) The guilt of the accused B) The sentence to be imposed C) The civil damages D) The jurisdiction of the court E) The sufficiency of evidence to file information
A) The accused B) The judge C) The prosecutor D) The defense E) The complainant’s lawyer
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Clear and convincing evidence C) Probable cause D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt E) Substantial evidence
A) Issuance of warrant of arrest B) Conviction C) Execution of judgment D) Filing of complaint E) Appeal
A) All evidence is admissible B) Only hearsay is excluded C) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible D) Character evidence is always allowed E) Confessions can be forced
A) Based on the witness’s own knowledge B) Always admissible C) Based on what another person told the witness D) Derived from physical evidence E) From an expert opinion
A) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so B) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form C) The facts charged do not constitute an offense D) The accused was previously convicted of another offense E) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused
A) Immediately impose sentence B) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea C) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability D) Refer the case to the Supreme Court E) Dismiss the case
A) Produce documents or objects for inspection B) Appear in court and testify C) Execute a written testimony D) Pay a fine to the court E) Remain in detention
A) The court decides which evidence is best B) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents C) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity D) Secondary evidence may always be admitted E) Testimonies are better than written evidence
A) By clear and convincing evidence B) By probable cause C) By a preponderance of evidence D) By credible testimony E) Beyond reasonable doubt
A) Testimony given by witnesses under oath B) Audio recordings C) Objects used in the commission of the crime D) Expert opinion submitted to the court E) Written statements or documents
A) The right to speedy disposition of cases B) The right to appeal C) The right to bail D) The right to be free from double jeopardy E) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel
A) Demurrer to evidence B) Lack of probable cause C) Improper venue D) Rebuttal testimony E) Double jeopardy
A) The confession of the suspect B) The penalty imposed by law C) The person of the accused D) The body of the victim only E) The facts proving that a crime has been committed
A) Simplify cross-examination B) Allow secret testimonies C) Remove the need for witnesses D) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits E) Avoid written evidence
A) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed B) The decision is void C) The decision can still be appealed D) The case is reopened automatically E) The case is transferred to another court
A) Finding of probable cause by the judge B) Order of the prosecutor C) Motion of the complainant D) Filing of the affidavit E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence submitted by the defense B) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure C) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness D) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest E) Evidence approved by the court
A) Bail is a security for the release of an accused B) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC C) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case D) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint E) Bail may be posted only by the police
A) Being tried in two different courts B) Being acquitted and later convicted C) Being arrested by two police units D) Being convicted twice of different offenses E) Being tried twice for the same offense
A) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office B) Election-related crimes C) Civil cases involving government officials D) Administrative cases of government employees E) All criminal cases
A) Trespassing cases B) Libel cases C) Traffic violations D) Drug-related cases E) Estafa cases
A) Suspend the prosecutor B) Dismiss the case C) Appoint a public attorney D) Proceed with trial E) Issue a warrant of arrest
A) Leading questions by any party B) Questioning by the judge C) Cross-examination of witnesses D) Questioning by the defense E) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness
A) Prohibited during all examinations B) Allowed during direct examination C) Used only by expert witnesses D) Required in re-direct examination E) Allowed during cross-examination
A) Present new evidence B) Introduce exhibits C) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness D) Support the testimony of one’s own witness E) Summarize all testimonies
A) Direct Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) Circumstantial Evidence
A) secondary evidence rule B) secondary evidence rule C) documentary evidence rule D) testimonial knowledge rule E) parol evidence rule
A) res inter alios acta rule B) res gestae rule C) testimonial knowledge rule D) res inter alios acta rule E) dying declaration
A) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan B) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father E) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown"
A) material evidence B) material evidence C) relevant evidence D) corroborative evidence E) substantial evidence
A) Conclusive presumption B) Presumption C) Presumption D) Burden of proof E) Burden of Evidence
A) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae B) it is a declaration against interest C) it is considered a dying declaration L D) it is considered part of the res gestae E) it is extrajudicial confession
A) demonstrative evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) real evidence D) cumulative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates D) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only
A) misleading B) hearsay C) leading D) leading E) stupid
A) None of the above B) presumption C) Burden of evidence D) Burden of evidence E) Burden of proof
A) B'sdeath is indispensable B) The declaration must be written C) B and A must have argument and has grudges D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) B's wound must be fatal
A) Presumptions B) None of the above C) Burden of proof D) Burden of proof E) Burden of evidence
A) The Rules of Summary Procedure B) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule C) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure D) The Rules of Summary Procedure E) The Rule of Court Testimony
A) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court B) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court C) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court D) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court E) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Expert Evidence D) SecondaryEvidence E) Real Evidence
A) Primary evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Conclusive evidence E) Best evidence
A) Admissible B) excluded by law C) Corroborative D) excluded by law E) best evidence
A) Cumulative Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Positive Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence |