A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Presumption
A) Secondary Evidence B) Sur-rebuttal Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is hearsay B) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only C) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant
A) admission B) judicial admission C) judicial confession D) judicial admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) they are extrajudicial admission B) they are extra judicial confession C) they are judicial confession D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are judicial admission
A) common reputation B) dying declaration C) res gestae D) declaration against interest E) res gestae
A) direct evidence B) positive evidence C) cumulative evidence D) corroborative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) extra-judicial admission B) extra-judicial confession C) judicial confession D) judicial confession E) judicial admission
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. C) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. D) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively E) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners
A) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged B) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case E) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case
A) Onus Probandi B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Burden of Proof D) Presumption Juris et de Jure E) Presumption Juris Tantum
A) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule B) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule C) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule D) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule E) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule
A) When he is a Questioned document examiner B) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. C) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. D) When he is criminology graduate E) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity.
A) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged B) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. C) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. D) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Maliciousquestion B) Answer C) Misleading question D) Leading question E) Leading question
A) All of the above B) Substantial evidence C) None of the above D) Preponderanceofevidence E) Preponderanceofevidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime D) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun
A) Substantial Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Object Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Documentary Evidence
A) It was B who died last B) It was A who survived C) It was A who died first D) It was A who survived E) It was B who survived
A) W died ahead of X B) X died after W C) X died a head of W D) Both died at the same time E) X died a head of W
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Prima facie Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) incompetent B) unacceptable C) irrelevant D) incompetent E) voidable
A) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination B) The defense will conduct the direct examination C) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination D) The defense will conduct the cross-examination E) The defense will conduct the direct examination
A) documentary evidence B) testimonial evidence C) documentary evidence D) oral evidence E) object evidence
A) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation D) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence E) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence
A) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule B) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication C) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest D) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae E) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule
A) Negative Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Corroborative Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay B) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. D) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation E) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias
A) Testimonial Evidence B) Secondary Evidence C) Express Admission D) Implied Admission E) Express Admission
A) marital privilege disqualification rule B) marital privilege communication rule C) marital privilege communication rule D) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule E) hearsay evidence rule
A) Direct examination B) Cross-examination C) Direct examination D) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination
A) Material Evidence B) Material Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Relevant Evidence
A) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death B) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death C) he declarant survives D) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify E) he declarant survives
A) it is circumstantial evidence B) it is a dying declaration C) it is a dying declaration D) It is hearsay E) It is corroborative evidence
A) Estoppel in pais B) Estoppel in pais C) Estoppel by lashes D) Estoppel by deed E) None of the above
A) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict B) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm C) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case D) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped E) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Prima Facie Evidence D) Competent Evidence E) Object evidence
A) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule B) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court C) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication D) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule E) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule
A) written agreements B) testimonial C) written agreements D) objects E) documents
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Positive Evidence D) Testimonial Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Civil actions for damages B) Substantive rights of parties C) Ethical conduct of lawyers D) Administrative penalties E) Manner of enforcing criminal law
A) Protect only the victim B) Avoid police investigations C) Punish the accused immediately D) Prolong the trial process E) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished
A) Filing of a complaint or information B) Issuance of a subpoena C) Decision of the judge D) Arrest of the accused E) Trial commencement
A) The prosecutor B) The offended party or any peace officer C) The defense lawyer D) The judge E) The accused
A) The complainant B) The police investigator C) The prosecutor D) The judge E) The accused
A) The nationality of the accused B) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense C) The place of arrest D) The amount of damages claimed E) The type of evidence presented
A) At all stages of the criminal process B) After conviction C) Only when he requests for it D) Only during trial E) Only during arraignment
A) Only in the prosecutor’s office B) In open court C) During preliminary investigation D) In private E) In the police station
A) Forbidden in criminal law B) The same as arraignment C) A negotiation between judge and witness D) Decided by the police E) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense
A) Conduct a searching inquiry B) Refer to mediation C) Immediately convict him D) Issue a warrant E) Dismiss the case
A) The prosecutor B) The police chief C) The complainant D) The judge E) The mayor
A) Fine B) Civil indemnity C) Confession D) Punishment E) Guarantee for appearance in court
A) The accused cannot delay trial B) No postponement is allowed C) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay D) The prosecution must drop weak cases E) Trial must be finished in one day
A) The prosecution presents two witnesses B) The court changes the charge C) The accused appeals his case D) The accused is tried twice for the same offense E) There are two informations filed
A) The civil damages B) The jurisdiction of the court C) The guilt of the accused D) The sentence to be imposed E) The sufficiency of evidence to file information
A) The judge B) The defense C) The complainant’s lawyer D) The prosecutor E) The accused
A) Substantial evidence B) Probable cause C) Clear and convincing evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt E) Preponderance of evidence
A) Filing of complaint B) Appeal C) Issuance of warrant of arrest D) Conviction E) Execution of judgment
A) Only hearsay is excluded B) Confessions can be forced C) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible D) Character evidence is always allowed E) All evidence is admissible
A) Based on what another person told the witness B) Always admissible C) From an expert opinion D) Derived from physical evidence E) Based on the witness’s own knowledge
A) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form B) The facts charged do not constitute an offense C) The accused was previously convicted of another offense D) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so E) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused
A) Immediately impose sentence B) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea C) Refer the case to the Supreme Court D) Dismiss the case E) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability
A) Produce documents or objects for inspection B) Execute a written testimony C) Appear in court and testify D) Pay a fine to the court E) Remain in detention
A) Secondary evidence may always be admitted B) Testimonies are better than written evidence C) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity D) The court decides which evidence is best E) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents
A) By clear and convincing evidence B) By probable cause C) Beyond reasonable doubt D) By a preponderance of evidence E) By credible testimony
A) Written statements or documents B) Testimony given by witnesses under oath C) Audio recordings D) Objects used in the commission of the crime E) Expert opinion submitted to the court
A) The right to speedy disposition of cases B) The right to bail C) The right to appeal D) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel E) The right to be free from double jeopardy
A) Improper venue B) Rebuttal testimony C) Double jeopardy D) Demurrer to evidence E) Lack of probable cause
A) The facts proving that a crime has been committed B) The person of the accused C) The penalty imposed by law D) The body of the victim only E) The confession of the suspect
A) Remove the need for witnesses B) Simplify cross-examination C) Allow secret testimonies D) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits E) Avoid written evidence
A) The case is reopened automatically B) The decision can still be appealed C) The decision is void D) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed E) The case is transferred to another court
A) Motion of the complainant B) Order of the prosecutor C) Filing of the affidavit D) Finding of probable cause by the judge E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure B) Evidence approved by the court C) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest D) Evidence submitted by the defense E) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness
A) Bail may be posted only by the police B) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case C) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC D) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint E) Bail is a security for the release of an accused
A) Being convicted twice of different offenses B) Being tried in two different courts C) Being acquitted and later convicted D) Being tried twice for the same offense E) Being arrested by two police units
A) Civil cases involving government officials B) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office C) Election-related crimes D) Administrative cases of government employees E) All criminal cases
A) Drug-related cases B) Estafa cases C) Libel cases D) Traffic violations E) Trespassing cases
A) Suspend the prosecutor B) Proceed with trial C) Appoint a public attorney D) Dismiss the case E) Issue a warrant of arrest
A) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness B) Questioning by the defense C) Questioning by the judge D) Leading questions by any party E) Cross-examination of witnesses
A) Allowed during direct examination B) Prohibited during all examinations C) Required in re-direct examination D) Used only by expert witnesses E) Allowed during cross-examination
A) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness B) Introduce exhibits C) Present new evidence D) Summarize all testimonies E) Support the testimony of one’s own witness
A) Direct Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Expert Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) secondary evidence rule C) secondary evidence rule D) parol evidence rule E) documentary evidence rule
A) res gestae rule B) dying declaration C) res inter alios acta rule D) testimonial knowledge rule E) res inter alios acta rule
A) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father B) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" E) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan
A) material evidence B) substantial evidence C) relevant evidence D) material evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) Burden of Evidence B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Conclusive presumption E) Presumption
A) it is a declaration against interest B) it is considered a dying declaration L C) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae D) it is extrajudicial confession E) it is considered part of the res gestae
A) real evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) demonstrative evidence E) cumulative evidence
A) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates E) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only
A) hearsay B) misleading C) leading D) leading E) stupid
A) Burden of proof B) presumption C) None of the above D) Burden of evidence E) Burden of evidence
A) B and A must have argument and has grudges B) B's wound must be fatal C) B'sdeath is indispensable D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) The declaration must be written
A) Presumptions B) None of the above C) Burden of evidence D) Burden of proof E) Burden of proof
A) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure B) The Rule of Court Testimony C) The Rules of Summary Procedure D) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule E) The Rules of Summary Procedure
A) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court B) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court C) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court D) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court E) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court
A) Conclusive Evidence B) SecondaryEvidence C) Real Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) Primary evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Best evidence D) Conclusive evidence E) Secondary evidence
A) Corroborative B) excluded by law C) excluded by law D) Admissible E) best evidence
A) Positive Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Cumulative Evidence E) Testimonial Evidence |