A) A behavior that encourages individuals to intervene in group settings. B) An instinctual response to assist in any emergency situation. C) A phenomenon where individuals are less likely to offer help in an emergency situation when other people are present. D) A study that shows people are more likely to help when alone.
A) 1975. B) 1990. C) 1968. D) 1982.
A) Rapid decision-making skills. B) Diffusion of responsibility. C) Heightened sense of personal responsibility. D) Strong individualistic values.
A) People respond more efficiently in groups rather than alone. B) People feel more personal responsibility to respond when others are present. C) People selectively assign responsibility to others in emergency situations. D) People feel less personal responsibility to respond when others are present.
A) Being aware of an emergency situation. B) Assessing the risks involved. C) Deciding whether to intervene. D) Taking direct action to help.
A) It only affects individual response time. B) It has no effect on emergency response time. C) It delays emergency response time. D) It speeds up emergency response time.
A) Rely on social norms to guide behavior. B) Assume someone else will help and walk away. C) Take personal responsibility and intervene. D) Avoid getting involved in emergency situations.
A) Educating individuals about the phenomenon and its consequences. B) Encouraging people to solely rely on group decision-making. C) Promoting an individualistic attitude in group settings. D) Ignoring the presence of others in emergency situations.
A) Ninety percent B) Seventy percent C) Fifty percent D) Forty percent
A) Non-emergency situations B) Dangerous emergencies C) Non-dangerous emergencies D) All types of emergencies
A) 70% B) Over 90% C) 50% D) 30%
A) Social comparison B) Social influence C) Social identity D) Social facilitation
A) Passive intervention B) Detour intervention C) Direct intervention D) Indirect intervention
A) All situations B) Non-dangerous situations C) Dangerous situations D) Non-emergency situations
A) Low consequence B) High ambiguity C) Group cohesiveness D) Environmental familiarity
A) Causes confusion B) Decreases likelihood C) Has no effect D) Increases likelihood
A) May inhibit helping behavior B) Increases urgency C) Encourages helping behavior D) Has no effect
A) Two member high cohesive group B) Four member high cohesive group C) Two member low cohesive group D) Four member low cohesive group
A) Condensing motives for action B) Interpreting a need for help C) Feeling empathy D) Noticing that something is wrong
A) A Coast Guard member B) A good samaritan C) A firefighter D) A police officer
A) May 30, 2011 B) October 24, 2009 C) March 13, 1964 D) December 25, 1964
A) Conformity B) Deindividuation C) Social facilitation D) Group polarization
A) Suzanne Harmen B) Sally Harmen C) Susan Harmen D) Suzy Harmen
A) 45.00 seconds B) 36.38 seconds C) 51.53 seconds D) 60.00 seconds
A) If the person was wearing a plain shirt B) If the person was wearing a liked football jersey C) If the person was wearing a disliked football jersey D) If the person was wearing a neutral shirt
A) 2009 B) 2010 C) 2008 D) 2011
A) Has no effect B) Causes confusion C) Always inhibits helping D) Can encourage helping
A) The Blue Light program B) The Red Flag program C) The Green Dot program D) The InterAct Sexual Assault Prevention program
A) James Harmen B) Jake Smith C) Jake Harmen D) John Harmen
A) Group size predicted helping B) Empathy no longer predicted helping C) Social identification predicted helping D) Empathy predicted helping
A) Amnesia B) Loss of hearing C) Scars from cigarette burns on her back D) Broken bones
A) Empathic anger B) Pluralistic ignorance C) Moral deliberation D) Social status scanning
A) Swimming B) Standing neck deep in water C) Fishing D) Sailing
A) Compliance with rules B) Gender stereotypes C) Fear of punishment D) Peer pressure
A) Cultural isolation B) Collective consciousness C) Individualism D) Personal accountability
A) The story had been exaggerated by the media B) The police were not called at all C) The attacker was immediately caught D) There were more than 38 eyewitnesses
A) 2005 B) 2012 C) 2007 D) 2010
A) 60.00 seconds B) 51.53 seconds C) 36.38 seconds D) 45.00 seconds
A) 5 minutes B) 3 minutes C) 10 minutes D) 15 minutes
A) Social comparison theory B) Social identity theory C) Self-categorization theory D) Cognitive dissonance theory
A) 30 minutes B) Nearly 40 minutes C) 50 minutes D) 20 minutes
A) Interpreting B) Noticing C) Feeling empathy D) Acting
A) Mitigating factors B) Reasonable doubt C) Justifiable reasons D) Extenuating circumstances
A) Feeling empathy B) Noticing that something is wrong C) Acting D) Interpreting a need for help
A) 100 B) 500 C) 400 D) 300
A) Primetime: What Would You Do? B) Bystander Intervention: Reality Check C) What Would You Do? The Series D) The Bystander Effect: Live
A) Dehydration B) Hypothermia C) Drowning D) Heart attack |