A) An interpretation used in software engineering. B) An interpretation that relies on axiomatic systems. C) An interpretation based on mathematical induction. D) An interpretation of a first-order logic formula by assigning concrete values to variables.
A) To eliminate the need for formal proofs. B) To standardize the notation used in mathematical proofs. C) To transform a proof into a canonical form for easier analysis. D) To add complexity to a proof in order to make it more convincing.
A) Determining the truth value of a proposition. B) Measuring the length of a mathematical proof. C) Counting the number of logical connectives in a formula. D) The study of the resources required to prove mathematical theorems.
A) The theorems eliminate the need for proof complexity. B) The theorems establish standard axiomatic systems. C) The theorems show the limitations of formal proof systems. D) The theorems provide new techniques for proof construction.
A) Alfred Tarski. B) Henri Poincaré. C) Gerhard Gentzen. D) Alonzo Church.
A) IF, THEN, ELSE. B) AND, OR, NOT. C) ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY. D) FOR, WHILE, DO.
A) A historical event in proof theory. B) A type of logical inference. C) A rule for constructing mathematical proofs. D) A correspondence between proofs and computer programs in intuitionistic logic.
A) The property that all proofs must eliminate cuts. B) Every proof containing a cut can be transformed into a cut-free proof. C) The rule that cuts are necessary for valid proofs. D) The principle that cuts cannot be used in formal logic. |