A) An interpretation that relies on axiomatic systems. B) An interpretation of a first-order logic formula by assigning concrete values to variables. C) An interpretation used in software engineering. D) An interpretation based on mathematical induction.
A) To eliminate the need for formal proofs. B) To add complexity to a proof in order to make it more convincing. C) To transform a proof into a canonical form for easier analysis. D) To standardize the notation used in mathematical proofs.
A) Counting the number of logical connectives in a formula. B) Measuring the length of a mathematical proof. C) Determining the truth value of a proposition. D) The study of the resources required to prove mathematical theorems.
A) The theorems provide new techniques for proof construction. B) The theorems eliminate the need for proof complexity. C) The theorems show the limitations of formal proof systems. D) The theorems establish standard axiomatic systems.
A) Alfred Tarski. B) Gerhard Gentzen. C) Henri Poincaré. D) Alonzo Church.
A) FOR, WHILE, DO. B) IF, THEN, ELSE. C) AND, OR, NOT. D) ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY.
A) A type of logical inference. B) A correspondence between proofs and computer programs in intuitionistic logic. C) A rule for constructing mathematical proofs. D) A historical event in proof theory.
A) The principle that cuts cannot be used in formal logic. B) Every proof containing a cut can be transformed into a cut-free proof. C) The rule that cuts are necessary for valid proofs. D) The property that all proofs must eliminate cuts. |