A) An interpretation that relies on axiomatic systems. B) An interpretation based on mathematical induction. C) An interpretation of a first-order logic formula by assigning concrete values to variables. D) An interpretation used in software engineering.
A) To transform a proof into a canonical form for easier analysis. B) To eliminate the need for formal proofs. C) To add complexity to a proof in order to make it more convincing. D) To standardize the notation used in mathematical proofs.
A) Determining the truth value of a proposition. B) Counting the number of logical connectives in a formula. C) Measuring the length of a mathematical proof. D) The study of the resources required to prove mathematical theorems.
A) The theorems provide new techniques for proof construction. B) The theorems eliminate the need for proof complexity. C) The theorems establish standard axiomatic systems. D) The theorems show the limitations of formal proof systems.
A) Alonzo Church. B) Alfred Tarski. C) Gerhard Gentzen. D) Henri Poincaré.
A) ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY. B) AND, OR, NOT. C) FOR, WHILE, DO. D) IF, THEN, ELSE.
A) A historical event in proof theory. B) A type of logical inference. C) A correspondence between proofs and computer programs in intuitionistic logic. D) A rule for constructing mathematical proofs.
A) The principle that cuts cannot be used in formal logic. B) The rule that cuts are necessary for valid proofs. C) Every proof containing a cut can be transformed into a cut-free proof. D) The property that all proofs must eliminate cuts. |