A) An interpretation used in software engineering. B) An interpretation based on mathematical induction. C) An interpretation of a first-order logic formula by assigning concrete values to variables. D) An interpretation that relies on axiomatic systems.
A) To transform a proof into a canonical form for easier analysis. B) To add complexity to a proof in order to make it more convincing. C) To eliminate the need for formal proofs. D) To standardize the notation used in mathematical proofs.
A) Counting the number of logical connectives in a formula. B) The study of the resources required to prove mathematical theorems. C) Measuring the length of a mathematical proof. D) Determining the truth value of a proposition.
A) Every proof containing a cut can be transformed into a cut-free proof. B) The principle that cuts cannot be used in formal logic. C) The rule that cuts are necessary for valid proofs. D) The property that all proofs must eliminate cuts.
A) A type of logical inference. B) A historical event in proof theory. C) A correspondence between proofs and computer programs in intuitionistic logic. D) A rule for constructing mathematical proofs.
A) AND, OR, NOT. B) IF, THEN, ELSE. C) FOR, WHILE, DO. D) ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY.
A) Alonzo Church. B) Gerhard Gentzen. C) Henri Poincaré. D) Alfred Tarski.
A) The theorems show the limitations of formal proof systems. B) The theorems provide new techniques for proof construction. C) The theorems establish standard axiomatic systems. D) The theorems eliminate the need for proof complexity. |