A) Unjust vexation B) Disgrace C) Scandal D) Indignity
A) If the man is legally married B) If the mistress is a relative C) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling D) If the mistress is a virgin
A) Cohabit B) Live-in C) Marriage D) Joint household
A) Oral evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Expert evidence
A) Object evidence B) Relevant evidence C) Material evidence D) Real evidence
A) Incompetent evidence B) None of these C) Inadmissible evidence D) Unreal evidence
A) All of these B) Medical science C) Forensic science D) Undeciphered writings
A) Misleading question B) Compound question C) Leading question D) General question
A) Misleading question B) Compound question C) Leading question D) General question
A) Leading question B) Misleading question C) Compound question D) General question
A) Capacity of observation B) Capacity of communication C) None of these D) Capacity of recollection
A) Use of force or intimidation by the offender B) Sterility of the offender C) Resistance on the part of the victim D) All of the foregoing
A) When it is relevant to the issue B) When it is competent C) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court D) All of the foregoing
A) Judicial confessions B) Judicial admissions C) Judicial notice D) Pleadings
A) Competent evidence B) Primary or best evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Competent evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Parol evidence rule B) Best evidence rule C) Res Gestae rule D) Hearsay rule
A) The husband is a party to the case B) The spouses was legally married C) The wife is a party to the case D) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other
A) Privilege communication B) Private communication C) Confidential communication D) Dying declaration
A) Communication was made in the course of professional employment B) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon C) None of the above D) Existence of an attorney client relation
A) A criminal case by one grandparent against another B) A criminal case by one the parent against the other C) All of the foregoing D) A crime against him
A) Contract B) Compromise C) Plea bargaining D) Stipulation
A) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor B) Admission by agent or privies C) Admission by conspirator D) All of the foregoing
A) The admission was made during the existence of the agency B) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority C) All of the foregoing D) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself
A) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts B) None of the above C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death
A) Disputable B) Stoppel C) Presumption D) Conclusive presumption
A) None of the above B) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude C) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent. D) A contradictory evidence
A) Judicial Record B) Official record C) Judicial notice D) Blotter
A) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven B) All of the foregoing C) There is more than one circumstance D) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established
A) That a certain result has been produced B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act C) Non of the foregoing D) Some person is criminally responsible for the act
A) Privileged conversation B) Filial privilege C) Parental privilege D) Dying declaration
A) Means that the accused is not the owner B) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime C) Evidence against the accused D) Prima facie evidence of fencing
A) Circumstantial B) Corroborative C) Cumulative D) Relevant
A) Material B) Real C) Corroborative D) Testimonial
A) Penitent B) Patient C) Secretary D) Client
A) Homosexuals and lesbians B) Insane persons C) Sick persons D) Children
A) Real evidence B) Res gestae C) Best evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Qualification B) Admissibility C) Competency D) Eligibility
A) Evidence B) Proof C) Intent D) Motive
A) Authentic B) Duplicate C) Genuine D) Original
A) Ante mortern statement B) Dead man statute C) Mi ultimo adios D) Parol evidence
A) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness B) They have not reached the age of discernment. C) They understand the obligation of the oath D) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Substantial evidence C) Ultimate fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Factum probans B) Res gestae C) Owes probandi D) Factum probandum
A) Prosecution B) Defense C) Clerk of court D) Witness
A) Testimony B) Confession C) Admission D) Extra-judicial confession
A) Judicial confession B) Confession C) Admission D) Extra-judicial
A) Res gestae B) Dying declaration C) Hearsay D) Testimonial evidence
A) Inheritance B) Heritage C) Pedigree D) Tradition
A) Factum probandum B) Factum probans C) Owes probandi D) Owe probandi
A) Weight of evidence B) Ultimate fact C) Evidentiary fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Weight of evidence B) Best evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Autoptic evidence B) Real evidence C) Physical evidence D) Corpus delicti
A) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) It must be of judicial recognizance C) There is more than one circumstance D) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved
A) None B) 3 C) 2 D) 1
A) Disputable presumption B) Conclusion C) Conclusive presumptions D) Presumption
A) Res gestae B) Burden of proff C) Estoppel D) Burden of evidence
A) Res gestae B) Burden of evidence C) Burden of proof D) Estoppel
A) Misleading B) Estoppel C) Leading D) Res gestae
A) Official document B) Official record C) Public document D) Private document
A) Testimony B) Positive identification C) Evidence D) Proof
A) Constitution B) Rules of Court C) Rules on Criminal Procedure D) Revised Penal Code
A) Ultimate fact B) Evidentiary fact C) Preponderance of evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Compenent B) Relevant C) Admissible D) Material
A) Relevant B) Competent C) Direct D) Material
A) Relevant B) Direct C) competent D) Material
A) Real B) Corroborative C) Cumulative D) Circumstantial
A) Real B) Circumstantial C) Corroborative D) Cumulative
A) Testimonial evidence B) Admission evidence C) Real evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Circumstantial B) Direct C) Negative D) Positive
A) Best B) Secondary C) Prima facie D) Primary
A) Expert B) Primary C) Best D) Secondary
A) Real B) Conclusive C) Best D) Primary
A) Sec 12 Bill of Rights B) Sec 17 Bill of Rights C) Sec 3 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Admission B) Judicial knowledge C) Cognizance D) Judicial Notice
A) Misleading B) Res gestae C) Leading D) Confusing
A) Material evidence B) Relevant evidence C) Positive evidence D) Negative evidence
A) Motion to dismiss B) Motion to inhibit C) Motion to postpone D) Plea to dismiss
A) All of these B) There is more than one circumstance C) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved
A) Some person is criminally liable for the act. B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the C) That a certain result has been produced. D) The accused must be the doer of the act
A) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. B) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer C) Both B and C D) Testimony of the one who made the writing
A) Public Document B) Genuine document C) Private Document D) Holographic document
A) Any of the foregoing. B) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. C) A questioned document examiner. D) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years.
A) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. B) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. C) Any of the foregoing D) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings.
A) Before testimony of the witness B) After the oath of taken by the witness C) After testimony D) After the oath of taken by the witness
A) After the direct examination of the witness. B) After the testimony of the witness C) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. D) During the cross examination
A) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. B) Prompt the court to accept it. C) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) After it has been offered in evidence d wit B) Before it has been offered in evidence C) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. D) d. None of these
A) Sufficiency of evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Weight of evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants B) After a party's testimonial evidence C) After pre trial D) During pre-trial
A) By contradictory evidence B) When they relate to preliminary matters. C) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. D) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness.
A) A deaf-mute person B) A feeble minded person C) A child of tender age D) A registered voter
A) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party. B) In case of a hostile witness. C) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. D) Any of the foregoing.
A) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. B) In case of a hostile witness C) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony. D) By contradictory evidence
A) Extra judicial statements B) Testimonial evidence C) Deposition D) Oral testimony
A) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based B) Of legal age C) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case D) Extensive Training and Education
A) There must be a startling occurrence B) It must exist previous to the controversy C) The statement must be spontaneous. D) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance.
A) Capacity of communication B) Capacity of recollection C) Capacity of knowledge D) Capacity of observation
A) Holographic document B) Genuine document C) Questioned document D) Authentic document
A) Alterations B) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd C) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer D) Collusion between in parties |