A) Indignity B) Unjust vexation C) Disgrace D) Scandal
A) If the mistress is a virgin B) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling C) If the man is legally married D) If the mistress is a relative
A) Cohabit B) Marriage C) Joint household D) Live-in
A) Testimonial evidence B) Oral evidence C) Expert evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Object evidence B) Real evidence C) Relevant evidence D) Material evidence
A) Unreal evidence B) None of these C) Inadmissible evidence D) Incompetent evidence
A) All of these B) Medical science C) Forensic science D) Undeciphered writings
A) General question B) Compound question C) Leading question D) Misleading question
A) Compound question B) Leading question C) General question D) Misleading question
A) Misleading question B) Leading question C) General question D) Compound question
A) None of these B) Capacity of observation C) Capacity of recollection D) Capacity of communication
A) All of the foregoing B) Sterility of the offender C) Use of force or intimidation by the offender D) Resistance on the part of the victim
A) When it is competent B) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court C) All of the foregoing D) When it is relevant to the issue
A) Judicial admissions B) Pleadings C) Judicial notice D) Judicial confessions
A) Primary or best evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Competent evidence
A) Primary or best evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Competent evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Res Gestae rule B) Hearsay rule C) Best evidence rule D) Parol evidence rule
A) The wife is a party to the case B) The husband is a party to the case C) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other D) The spouses was legally married
A) Dying declaration B) Privilege communication C) Confidential communication D) Private communication
A) None of the above B) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon C) Existence of an attorney client relation D) Communication was made in the course of professional employment
A) A crime against him B) All of the foregoing C) A criminal case by one grandparent against another D) A criminal case by one the parent against the other
A) Compromise B) Contract C) Plea bargaining D) Stipulation
A) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor B) All of the foregoing C) Admission by agent or privies D) Admission by conspirator
A) The admission was made during the existence of the agency B) All of the foregoing C) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself D) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority
A) None of the above B) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts
A) Stoppel B) Disputable C) Presumption D) Conclusive presumption
A) None of the above B) A contradictory evidence C) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude D) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent.
A) Judicial notice B) Judicial Record C) Blotter D) Official record
A) All of the foregoing B) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established C) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven D) There is more than one circumstance
A) Non of the foregoing B) That a certain result has been produced C) Some person is criminally responsible for the act D) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act
A) Parental privilege B) Dying declaration C) Filial privilege D) Privileged conversation
A) Evidence against the accused B) Means that the accused is not the owner C) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime D) Prima facie evidence of fencing
A) Cumulative B) Relevant C) Circumstantial D) Corroborative
A) Real B) Material C) Corroborative D) Testimonial
A) Patient B) Client C) Penitent D) Secretary
A) Sick persons B) Insane persons C) Homosexuals and lesbians D) Children
A) Real evidence B) Best evidence C) Res gestae D) Secondary evidence
A) Admissibility B) Eligibility C) Competency D) Qualification
A) Intent B) Proof C) Evidence D) Motive
A) Authentic B) Original C) Duplicate D) Genuine
A) Ante mortern statement B) Dead man statute C) Parol evidence D) Mi ultimo adios
A) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness B) They understand the obligation of the oath C) They have not reached the age of discernment. D) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Proof beyond reasonable doubt C) Substantial evidence D) Ultimate fact
A) Res gestae B) Owes probandi C) Factum probans D) Factum probandum
A) Prosecution B) Defense C) Clerk of court D) Witness
A) Extra-judicial confession B) Testimony C) Confession D) Admission
A) Confession B) Admission C) Extra-judicial D) Judicial confession
A) Dying declaration B) Testimonial evidence C) Res gestae D) Hearsay
A) Pedigree B) Inheritance C) Tradition D) Heritage
A) Factum probans B) Factum probandum C) Owes probandi D) Owe probandi
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Weight of evidence C) Evidentiary fact D) Ultimate fact
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Best evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Real evidence B) Physical evidence C) Corpus delicti D) Autoptic evidence
A) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) It must be of judicial recognizance C) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved D) There is more than one circumstance
A) 1 B) 3 C) 2 D) None
A) Conclusion B) Conclusive presumptions C) Presumption D) Disputable presumption
A) Estoppel B) Res gestae C) Burden of evidence D) Burden of proff
A) Estoppel B) Burden of proof C) Res gestae D) Burden of evidence
A) Res gestae B) Estoppel C) Leading D) Misleading
A) Public document B) Official document C) Private document D) Official record
A) Proof B) Testimony C) Evidence D) Positive identification
A) Rules on Criminal Procedure B) Constitution C) Rules of Court D) Revised Penal Code
A) Evidentiary fact B) Ultimate fact C) Weight of evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Material B) Compenent C) Relevant D) Admissible
A) Relevant B) Material C) Direct D) Competent
A) Material B) Relevant C) competent D) Direct
A) Cumulative B) Circumstantial C) Corroborative D) Real
A) Corroborative B) Cumulative C) Circumstantial D) Real
A) Testimonial evidence B) Admission evidence C) Real evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Circumstantial B) Direct C) Negative D) Positive
A) Primary B) Best C) Prima facie D) Secondary
A) Best B) Secondary C) Expert D) Primary
A) Conclusive B) Best C) Primary D) Real
A) Sec 3 Bill of Rights B) Sec 17 Bill of Rights C) Sec 12 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Admission B) Judicial Notice C) Cognizance D) Judicial knowledge
A) Confusing B) Misleading C) Leading D) Res gestae
A) Relevant evidence B) Positive evidence C) Negative evidence D) Material evidence
A) Motion to postpone B) Motion to dismiss C) Plea to dismiss D) Motion to inhibit
A) All of these B) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved C) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) There is more than one circumstance
A) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the B) That a certain result has been produced. C) The accused must be the doer of the act D) Some person is criminally liable for the act.
A) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. B) Both B and C C) Testimony of the one who made the writing D) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer
A) Private Document B) Holographic document C) Genuine document D) Public Document
A) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. B) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. C) Any of the foregoing. D) A questioned document examiner.
A) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. B) Any of the foregoing C) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. D) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings.
A) Before testimony of the witness B) After the oath of taken by the witness C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) After testimony
A) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. B) After the direct examination of the witness. C) During the cross examination D) After the testimony of the witness
A) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena B) Prompt the court to accept it. C) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) d. None of these B) After it has been offered in evidence d wit C) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. D) Before it has been offered in evidence
A) Weight of evidence B) Sufficiency of evidence C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Preponderance of evidence
A) During pre-trial B) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants C) After a party's testimonial evidence D) After pre trial
A) When they relate to preliminary matters. B) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. C) By contradictory evidence D) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness.
A) A registered voter B) A feeble minded person C) A deaf-mute person D) A child of tender age
A) Any of the foregoing. B) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. C) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party. D) In case of a hostile witness.
A) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. B) In case of a hostile witness C) By contradictory evidence D) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony.
A) Extra judicial statements B) Deposition C) Testimonial evidence D) Oral testimony
A) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case B) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based C) Extensive Training and Education D) Of legal age
A) The statement must be spontaneous. B) It must exist previous to the controversy C) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. D) There must be a startling occurrence
A) Capacity of knowledge B) Capacity of recollection C) Capacity of observation D) Capacity of communication
A) Questioned document B) Genuine document C) Authentic document D) Holographic document
A) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer B) Collusion between in parties C) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd D) Alterations |