A) Unjust vexation B) Indignity C) Scandal D) Disgrace
A) If the mistress is a virgin B) If the man is legally married C) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling D) If the mistress is a relative
A) Cohabit B) Live-in C) Marriage D) Joint household
A) Expert evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Oral evidence
A) Real evidence B) Material evidence C) Object evidence D) Relevant evidence
A) Incompetent evidence B) Unreal evidence C) Inadmissible evidence D) None of these
A) Forensic science B) Undeciphered writings C) All of these D) Medical science
A) Misleading question B) Compound question C) Leading question D) General question
A) General question B) Leading question C) Compound question D) Misleading question
A) General question B) Misleading question C) Leading question D) Compound question
A) Capacity of communication B) None of these C) Capacity of recollection D) Capacity of observation
A) Use of force or intimidation by the offender B) Sterility of the offender C) Resistance on the part of the victim D) All of the foregoing
A) When it is competent B) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court C) All of the foregoing D) When it is relevant to the issue
A) Judicial confessions B) Judicial admissions C) Judicial notice D) Pleadings
A) Primary or best evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Competent evidence
A) Primary or best evidence B) Competent evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Best evidence rule B) Res Gestae rule C) Hearsay rule D) Parol evidence rule
A) The wife is a party to the case B) The husband is a party to the case C) The spouses was legally married D) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other
A) Confidential communication B) Dying declaration C) Privilege communication D) Private communication
A) None of the above B) Existence of an attorney client relation C) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon D) Communication was made in the course of professional employment
A) A crime against him B) A criminal case by one the parent against the other C) All of the foregoing D) A criminal case by one grandparent against another
A) Contract B) Compromise C) Plea bargaining D) Stipulation
A) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor B) All of the foregoing C) Admission by conspirator D) Admission by agent or privies
A) The admission was made during the existence of the agency B) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority C) All of the foregoing D) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself
A) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts B) None of the above C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death
A) Disputable B) Presumption C) Conclusive presumption D) Stoppel
A) A contradictory evidence B) None of the above C) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude D) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent.
A) Official record B) Judicial notice C) Judicial Record D) Blotter
A) There is more than one circumstance B) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established C) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven D) All of the foregoing
A) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act B) Some person is criminally responsible for the act C) Non of the foregoing D) That a certain result has been produced
A) Filial privilege B) Parental privilege C) Dying declaration D) Privileged conversation
A) Evidence against the accused B) Means that the accused is not the owner C) Prima facie evidence of fencing D) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime
A) Circumstantial B) Cumulative C) Corroborative D) Relevant
A) Corroborative B) Testimonial C) Real D) Material
A) Penitent B) Client C) Secretary D) Patient
A) Homosexuals and lesbians B) Children C) Insane persons D) Sick persons
A) Res gestae B) Best evidence C) Real evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Admissibility B) Competency C) Eligibility D) Qualification
A) Intent B) Proof C) Evidence D) Motive
A) Authentic B) Original C) Duplicate D) Genuine
A) Mi ultimo adios B) Dead man statute C) Ante mortern statement D) Parol evidence
A) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness B) They understand the obligation of the oath C) They have not reached the age of discernment. D) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify
A) Ultimate fact B) Proof beyond reasonable doubt C) Substantial evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Owes probandi B) Factum probans C) Res gestae D) Factum probandum
A) Clerk of court B) Defense C) Witness D) Prosecution
A) Admission B) Extra-judicial confession C) Testimony D) Confession
A) Extra-judicial B) Confession C) Admission D) Judicial confession
A) Res gestae B) Hearsay C) Testimonial evidence D) Dying declaration
A) Pedigree B) Heritage C) Tradition D) Inheritance
A) Factum probandum B) Owe probandi C) Owes probandi D) Factum probans
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Weight of evidence C) Evidentiary fact D) Ultimate fact
A) Weight of evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Best evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Physical evidence B) Real evidence C) Corpus delicti D) Autoptic evidence
A) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved B) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. C) There is more than one circumstance D) It must be of judicial recognizance
A) 2 B) None C) 3 D) 1
A) Presumption B) Conclusion C) Disputable presumption D) Conclusive presumptions
A) Res gestae B) Estoppel C) Burden of proff D) Burden of evidence
A) Res gestae B) Estoppel C) Burden of evidence D) Burden of proof
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Estoppel D) Misleading
A) Public document B) Official record C) Private document D) Official document
A) Testimony B) Positive identification C) Proof D) Evidence
A) Revised Penal Code B) Rules of Court C) Constitution D) Rules on Criminal Procedure
A) Ultimate fact B) Preponderance of evidence C) Evidentiary fact D) Weight of evidence
A) Admissible B) Compenent C) Relevant D) Material
A) Direct B) Competent C) Relevant D) Material
A) competent B) Direct C) Relevant D) Material
A) Corroborative B) Circumstantial C) Real D) Cumulative
A) Cumulative B) Circumstantial C) Corroborative D) Real
A) Testimonial evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Admission evidence D) Real evidence
A) Positive B) Circumstantial C) Negative D) Direct
A) Secondary B) Prima facie C) Primary D) Best
A) Expert B) Best C) Secondary D) Primary
A) Primary B) Conclusive C) Real D) Best
A) Sec 12 Bill of Rights B) Sec 17 Bill of Rights C) Sec 3 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Notice B) Judicial knowledge C) Judicial Admission D) Cognizance
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Confusing D) Misleading
A) Relevant evidence B) Negative evidence C) Positive evidence D) Material evidence
A) Plea to dismiss B) Motion to postpone C) Motion to dismiss D) Motion to inhibit
A) All of these B) There is more than one circumstance C) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved D) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
A) That a certain result has been produced. B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the C) The accused must be the doer of the act D) Some person is criminally liable for the act.
A) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer B) Testimony of the one who made the writing C) Both B and C D) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing.
A) Genuine document B) Holographic document C) Private Document D) Public Document
A) Any of the foregoing. B) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. C) A questioned document examiner. D) Secretary of the accused for 20 years.
A) Any of the foregoing B) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. C) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. D) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings.
A) After the oath of taken by the witness B) After the oath of taken by the witness C) After testimony D) Before testimony of the witness
A) During the cross examination B) After the direct examination of the witness. C) After the testimony of the witness D) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent.
A) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record B) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. C) Prompt the court to accept it. D) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena
A) d. None of these B) Before it has been offered in evidence C) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. D) After it has been offered in evidence d wit
A) Sufficiency of evidence B) Proof beyond reasonable doubt C) Preponderance of evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) After a party's testimonial evidence B) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants C) After pre trial D) During pre-trial
A) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. B) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. C) When they relate to preliminary matters. D) By contradictory evidence
A) A feeble minded person B) A deaf-mute person C) A child of tender age D) A registered voter
A) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party. B) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. C) In case of a hostile witness. D) Any of the foregoing.
A) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony. B) By contradictory evidence C) In case of a hostile witness D) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad.
A) Testimonial evidence B) Oral testimony C) Extra judicial statements D) Deposition
A) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based B) Extensive Training and Education C) Of legal age D) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case
A) The statement must be spontaneous. B) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. C) There must be a startling occurrence D) It must exist previous to the controversy
A) Capacity of knowledge B) Capacity of communication C) Capacity of observation D) Capacity of recollection
A) Authentic document B) Questioned document C) Holographic document D) Genuine document
A) Collusion between in parties B) Alterations C) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd D) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer |