A) Disgrace B) Scandal C) Indignity D) Unjust vexation
A) If the mistress is a virgin B) If the mistress is a relative C) If the man is legally married D) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling
A) Live-in B) Cohabit C) Joint household D) Marriage
A) Testimonial evidence B) Oral evidence C) Expert evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Relevant evidence B) Real evidence C) Material evidence D) Object evidence
A) Incompetent evidence B) None of these C) Unreal evidence D) Inadmissible evidence
A) Undeciphered writings B) Forensic science C) All of these D) Medical science
A) Compound question B) Misleading question C) Leading question D) General question
A) Leading question B) Compound question C) Misleading question D) General question
A) Compound question B) Leading question C) General question D) Misleading question
A) Capacity of observation B) Capacity of recollection C) Capacity of communication D) None of these
A) Use of force or intimidation by the offender B) Sterility of the offender C) All of the foregoing D) Resistance on the part of the victim
A) All of the foregoing B) When it is competent C) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court D) When it is relevant to the issue
A) Judicial confessions B) Pleadings C) Judicial notice D) Judicial admissions
A) Primary or best evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Competent evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Competent evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Res Gestae rule B) Best evidence rule C) Hearsay rule D) Parol evidence rule
A) The spouses was legally married B) The husband is a party to the case C) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other D) The wife is a party to the case
A) Privilege communication B) Dying declaration C) Confidential communication D) Private communication
A) None of the above B) Communication was made in the course of professional employment C) Existence of an attorney client relation D) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon
A) A criminal case by one the parent against the other B) A criminal case by one grandparent against another C) A crime against him D) All of the foregoing
A) Contract B) Compromise C) Stipulation D) Plea bargaining
A) All of the foregoing B) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor C) Admission by agent or privies D) Admission by conspirator
A) All of the foregoing B) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself C) The admission was made during the existence of the agency D) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority
A) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts B) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) None of the above
A) Presumption B) Disputable C) Stoppel D) Conclusive presumption
A) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude B) A contradictory evidence C) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent. D) None of the above
A) Judicial notice B) Official record C) Blotter D) Judicial Record
A) All of the foregoing B) There is more than one circumstance C) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven D) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established
A) Some person is criminally responsible for the act B) Non of the foregoing C) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act D) That a certain result has been produced
A) Parental privilege B) Dying declaration C) Privileged conversation D) Filial privilege
A) Prima facie evidence of fencing B) Means that the accused is not the owner C) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime D) Evidence against the accused
A) Circumstantial B) Relevant C) Corroborative D) Cumulative
A) Material B) Real C) Corroborative D) Testimonial
A) Secretary B) Patient C) Client D) Penitent
A) Homosexuals and lesbians B) Insane persons C) Children D) Sick persons
A) Real evidence B) Best evidence C) Res gestae D) Secondary evidence
A) Qualification B) Competency C) Eligibility D) Admissibility
A) Evidence B) Intent C) Proof D) Motive
A) Duplicate B) Original C) Authentic D) Genuine
A) Dead man statute B) Ante mortern statement C) Parol evidence D) Mi ultimo adios
A) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify B) They understand the obligation of the oath C) They have not reached the age of discernment. D) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness
A) Ultimate fact B) Substantial evidence C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Factum probandum B) Res gestae C) Owes probandi D) Factum probans
A) Witness B) Prosecution C) Defense D) Clerk of court
A) Confession B) Testimony C) Admission D) Extra-judicial confession
A) Extra-judicial B) Confession C) Admission D) Judicial confession
A) Dying declaration B) Testimonial evidence C) Hearsay D) Res gestae
A) Tradition B) Pedigree C) Inheritance D) Heritage
A) Factum probans B) Factum probandum C) Owe probandi D) Owes probandi
A) Ultimate fact B) Evidentiary fact C) Weight of evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Secondary evidence B) Best evidence C) Preponderance of evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Autoptic evidence B) Real evidence C) Physical evidence D) Corpus delicti
A) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) There is more than one circumstance C) It must be of judicial recognizance D) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved
A) 2 B) None C) 1 D) 3
A) Conclusion B) Disputable presumption C) Presumption D) Conclusive presumptions
A) Res gestae B) Burden of evidence C) Estoppel D) Burden of proff
A) Burden of proof B) Res gestae C) Estoppel D) Burden of evidence
A) Estoppel B) Leading C) Misleading D) Res gestae
A) Official document B) Private document C) Official record D) Public document
A) Evidence B) Positive identification C) Proof D) Testimony
A) Rules of Court B) Constitution C) Revised Penal Code D) Rules on Criminal Procedure
A) Evidentiary fact B) Weight of evidence C) Ultimate fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Admissible B) Material C) Compenent D) Relevant
A) Relevant B) Direct C) Competent D) Material
A) Direct B) competent C) Material D) Relevant
A) Real B) Cumulative C) Corroborative D) Circumstantial
A) Corroborative B) Cumulative C) Real D) Circumstantial
A) Documentary evidence B) Admission evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Real evidence
A) Positive B) Circumstantial C) Negative D) Direct
A) Primary B) Secondary C) Prima facie D) Best
A) Expert B) Secondary C) Primary D) Best
A) Primary B) Conclusive C) Best D) Real
A) Sec 12 Bill of Rights B) Sec 17 Bill of Rights C) Sec 3 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Admission B) Judicial Notice C) Judicial knowledge D) Cognizance
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Misleading D) Confusing
A) Negative evidence B) Positive evidence C) Material evidence D) Relevant evidence
A) Motion to dismiss B) Motion to postpone C) Plea to dismiss D) Motion to inhibit
A) There is more than one circumstance B) All of these C) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved D) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
A) The accused must be the doer of the act B) Some person is criminally liable for the act. C) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the D) That a certain result has been produced.
A) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer B) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. C) Both B and C D) Testimony of the one who made the writing
A) Holographic document B) Public Document C) Private Document D) Genuine document
A) A questioned document examiner. B) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. C) Any of the foregoing. D) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years.
A) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. B) Any of the foregoing C) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. D) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings.
A) After the oath of taken by the witness B) Before testimony of the witness C) After testimony D) After the oath of taken by the witness
A) During the cross examination B) After the testimony of the witness C) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. D) After the direct examination of the witness.
A) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. B) Prompt the court to accept it. C) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) d. None of these B) After it has been offered in evidence d wit C) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. D) Before it has been offered in evidence
A) Weight of evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Sufficiency of evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants B) During pre-trial C) After a party's testimonial evidence D) After pre trial
A) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. B) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. C) When they relate to preliminary matters. D) By contradictory evidence
A) A deaf-mute person B) A child of tender age C) A registered voter D) A feeble minded person
A) In case of a hostile witness. B) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party. C) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. D) Any of the foregoing.
A) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. B) In case of a hostile witness C) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony. D) By contradictory evidence
A) Extra judicial statements B) Testimonial evidence C) Oral testimony D) Deposition
A) Extensive Training and Education B) Of legal age C) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case D) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based
A) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. B) It must exist previous to the controversy C) The statement must be spontaneous. D) There must be a startling occurrence
A) Capacity of recollection B) Capacity of observation C) Capacity of knowledge D) Capacity of communication
A) Holographic document B) Questioned document C) Authentic document D) Genuine document
A) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd B) Alterations C) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer D) Collusion between in parties |