A) Scandal B) Indignity C) Disgrace D) Unjust vexation
A) If the man is legally married B) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling C) If the mistress is a virgin D) If the mistress is a relative
A) Cohabit B) Live-in C) Joint household D) Marriage
A) Expert evidence B) Oral evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Real evidence B) Material evidence C) Relevant evidence D) Object evidence
A) None of these B) Unreal evidence C) Incompetent evidence D) Inadmissible evidence
A) All of these B) Undeciphered writings C) Medical science D) Forensic science
A) Misleading question B) General question C) Compound question D) Leading question
A) Misleading question B) Leading question C) Compound question D) General question
A) Leading question B) General question C) Compound question D) Misleading question
A) Capacity of recollection B) Capacity of observation C) Capacity of communication D) None of these
A) Use of force or intimidation by the offender B) Sterility of the offender C) Resistance on the part of the victim D) All of the foregoing
A) When it is relevant to the issue B) When it is competent C) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court D) All of the foregoing
A) Pleadings B) Judicial confessions C) Judicial admissions D) Judicial notice
A) Primary or best evidence B) Competent evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Conclusive evidence B) Competent evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Res Gestae rule B) Parol evidence rule C) Hearsay rule D) Best evidence rule
A) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other B) The spouses was legally married C) The husband is a party to the case D) The wife is a party to the case
A) Confidential communication B) Private communication C) Privilege communication D) Dying declaration
A) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon B) Communication was made in the course of professional employment C) None of the above D) Existence of an attorney client relation
A) A criminal case by one grandparent against another B) All of the foregoing C) A criminal case by one the parent against the other D) A crime against him
A) Stipulation B) Compromise C) Contract D) Plea bargaining
A) Admission by conspirator B) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor C) Admission by agent or privies D) All of the foregoing
A) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority B) The admission was made during the existence of the agency C) All of the foregoing D) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself
A) None of the above B) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry C) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts D) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death
A) Presumption B) Stoppel C) Disputable D) Conclusive presumption
A) None of the above B) A contradictory evidence C) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude D) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent.
A) Official record B) Judicial Record C) Judicial notice D) Blotter
A) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven B) All of the foregoing C) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established D) There is more than one circumstance
A) Some person is criminally responsible for the act B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act C) Non of the foregoing D) That a certain result has been produced
A) Parental privilege B) Privileged conversation C) Filial privilege D) Dying declaration
A) Evidence against the accused B) Prima facie evidence of fencing C) Means that the accused is not the owner D) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime
A) Corroborative B) Cumulative C) Relevant D) Circumstantial
A) Real B) Testimonial C) Corroborative D) Material
A) Client B) Penitent C) Patient D) Secretary
A) Sick persons B) Children C) Insane persons D) Homosexuals and lesbians
A) Secondary evidence B) Real evidence C) Best evidence D) Res gestae
A) Qualification B) Competency C) Admissibility D) Eligibility
A) Intent B) Evidence C) Motive D) Proof
A) Original B) Genuine C) Authentic D) Duplicate
A) Parol evidence B) Mi ultimo adios C) Ante mortern statement D) Dead man statute
A) They have not reached the age of discernment. B) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness C) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify D) They understand the obligation of the oath
A) Substantial evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Ultimate fact
A) Res gestae B) Factum probandum C) Owes probandi D) Factum probans
A) Witness B) Defense C) Prosecution D) Clerk of court
A) Extra-judicial confession B) Admission C) Testimony D) Confession
A) Judicial confession B) Extra-judicial C) Admission D) Confession
A) Hearsay B) Res gestae C) Testimonial evidence D) Dying declaration
A) Inheritance B) Pedigree C) Tradition D) Heritage
A) Owes probandi B) Owe probandi C) Factum probandum D) Factum probans
A) Ultimate fact B) Preponderance of evidence C) Evidentiary fact D) Weight of evidence
A) Best evidence B) Weight of evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Corpus delicti B) Real evidence C) Physical evidence D) Autoptic evidence
A) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved C) It must be of judicial recognizance D) There is more than one circumstance
A) None B) 3 C) 2 D) 1
A) Presumption B) Conclusion C) Conclusive presumptions D) Disputable presumption
A) Res gestae B) Estoppel C) Burden of proff D) Burden of evidence
A) Burden of proof B) Res gestae C) Estoppel D) Burden of evidence
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Estoppel D) Misleading
A) Official record B) Private document C) Official document D) Public document
A) Evidence B) Proof C) Positive identification D) Testimony
A) Constitution B) Revised Penal Code C) Rules of Court D) Rules on Criminal Procedure
A) Evidentiary fact B) Ultimate fact C) Preponderance of evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Compenent B) Admissible C) Material D) Relevant
A) Material B) Direct C) Competent D) Relevant
A) Material B) Direct C) Relevant D) competent
A) Cumulative B) Circumstantial C) Real D) Corroborative
A) Corroborative B) Real C) Cumulative D) Circumstantial
A) Admission evidence B) Real evidence C) Documentary evidence D) Testimonial evidence
A) Direct B) Positive C) Negative D) Circumstantial
A) Primary B) Prima facie C) Secondary D) Best
A) Expert B) Secondary C) Best D) Primary
A) Best B) Conclusive C) Real D) Primary
A) Sec 3 Bill of Rights B) Sec 12 Bill of Rights C) Sec 17 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial knowledge B) Judicial Admission C) Judicial Notice D) Cognizance
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Confusing D) Misleading
A) Negative evidence B) Positive evidence C) Relevant evidence D) Material evidence
A) Motion to postpone B) Motion to dismiss C) Plea to dismiss D) Motion to inhibit
A) There is more than one circumstance B) All of these C) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved
A) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the B) Some person is criminally liable for the act. C) The accused must be the doer of the act D) That a certain result has been produced.
A) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer B) Testimony of the one who made the writing C) Both B and C D) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing.
A) Private Document B) Holographic document C) Public Document D) Genuine document
A) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. B) Any of the foregoing. C) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. D) A questioned document examiner.
A) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. B) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. C) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. D) Any of the foregoing
A) After testimony B) Before testimony of the witness C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) After the oath of taken by the witness
A) After the testimony of the witness B) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. C) After the direct examination of the witness. D) During the cross examination
A) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena B) Prompt the court to accept it. C) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) Before it has been offered in evidence B) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. C) After it has been offered in evidence d wit D) d. None of these
A) Weight of evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Sufficiency of evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) During pre-trial B) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants C) After pre trial D) After a party's testimonial evidence
A) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. B) By contradictory evidence C) When they relate to preliminary matters. D) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness.
A) A registered voter B) A deaf-mute person C) A child of tender age D) A feeble minded person
A) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. B) Any of the foregoing. C) In case of a hostile witness. D) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party.
A) By contradictory evidence B) In case of a hostile witness C) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. D) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony.
A) Testimonial evidence B) Extra judicial statements C) Deposition D) Oral testimony
A) Extensive Training and Education B) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case C) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based D) Of legal age
A) The statement must be spontaneous. B) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. C) It must exist previous to the controversy D) There must be a startling occurrence
A) Capacity of observation B) Capacity of knowledge C) Capacity of recollection D) Capacity of communication
A) Genuine document B) Authentic document C) Questioned document D) Holographic document
A) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd B) Collusion between in parties C) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer D) Alterations |