A) Unjust vexation B) Disgrace C) Scandal D) Indignity
A) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling B) If the man is legally married C) If the mistress is a relative D) If the mistress is a virgin
A) Joint household B) Live-in C) Cohabit D) Marriage
A) Expert evidence B) Oral evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Object evidence B) Material evidence C) Real evidence D) Relevant evidence
A) Unreal evidence B) Incompetent evidence C) None of these D) Inadmissible evidence
A) All of these B) Undeciphered writings C) Forensic science D) Medical science
A) Compound question B) Leading question C) Misleading question D) General question
A) General question B) Compound question C) Leading question D) Misleading question
A) Compound question B) Misleading question C) Leading question D) General question
A) Capacity of recollection B) Capacity of observation C) None of these D) Capacity of communication
A) Use of force or intimidation by the offender B) Resistance on the part of the victim C) All of the foregoing D) Sterility of the offender
A) When it is competent B) When it is relevant to the issue C) All of the foregoing D) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court
A) Judicial admissions B) Pleadings C) Judicial notice D) Judicial confessions
A) Conclusive evidence B) Competent evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Primary or best evidence
A) Primary or best evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Competent evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Hearsay rule B) Res Gestae rule C) Best evidence rule D) Parol evidence rule
A) The wife is a party to the case B) The spouses was legally married C) The husband is a party to the case D) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other
A) Privilege communication B) Private communication C) Dying declaration D) Confidential communication
A) Existence of an attorney client relation B) None of the above C) Communication was made in the course of professional employment D) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon
A) A criminal case by one grandparent against another B) A crime against him C) A criminal case by one the parent against the other D) All of the foregoing
A) Contract B) Compromise C) Stipulation D) Plea bargaining
A) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor B) Admission by agent or privies C) All of the foregoing D) Admission by conspirator
A) The admission was made during the existence of the agency B) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority C) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself D) All of the foregoing
A) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts B) None of the above C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death
A) Presumption B) Disputable C) Stoppel D) Conclusive presumption
A) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude B) None of the above C) A contradictory evidence D) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent.
A) Official record B) Judicial notice C) Blotter D) Judicial Record
A) All of the foregoing B) There is more than one circumstance C) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established D) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven
A) Some person is criminally responsible for the act B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act C) That a certain result has been produced D) Non of the foregoing
A) Parental privilege B) Filial privilege C) Privileged conversation D) Dying declaration
A) Evidence against the accused B) Means that the accused is not the owner C) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime D) Prima facie evidence of fencing
A) Corroborative B) Circumstantial C) Relevant D) Cumulative
A) Corroborative B) Material C) Real D) Testimonial
A) Penitent B) Patient C) Client D) Secretary
A) Insane persons B) Children C) Sick persons D) Homosexuals and lesbians
A) Best evidence B) Res gestae C) Secondary evidence D) Real evidence
A) Eligibility B) Competency C) Admissibility D) Qualification
A) Evidence B) Proof C) Intent D) Motive
A) Genuine B) Authentic C) Original D) Duplicate
A) Parol evidence B) Ante mortern statement C) Mi ultimo adios D) Dead man statute
A) They understand the obligation of the oath B) They have not reached the age of discernment. C) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify D) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Preponderance of evidence C) Substantial evidence D) Ultimate fact
A) Factum probans B) Res gestae C) Factum probandum D) Owes probandi
A) Prosecution B) Clerk of court C) Defense D) Witness
A) Confession B) Admission C) Extra-judicial confession D) Testimony
A) Confession B) Extra-judicial C) Admission D) Judicial confession
A) Res gestae B) Testimonial evidence C) Dying declaration D) Hearsay
A) Heritage B) Inheritance C) Tradition D) Pedigree
A) Owes probandi B) Factum probandum C) Owe probandi D) Factum probans
A) Evidentiary fact B) Ultimate fact C) Preponderance of evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Best evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Corpus delicti B) Physical evidence C) Autoptic evidence D) Real evidence
A) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) It must be of judicial recognizance C) There is more than one circumstance D) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved
A) 3 B) 1 C) 2 D) None
A) Conclusion B) Conclusive presumptions C) Presumption D) Disputable presumption
A) Burden of proff B) Estoppel C) Burden of evidence D) Res gestae
A) Burden of proof B) Burden of evidence C) Estoppel D) Res gestae
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Misleading D) Estoppel
A) Official document B) Private document C) Official record D) Public document
A) Evidence B) Proof C) Testimony D) Positive identification
A) Rules of Court B) Constitution C) Revised Penal Code D) Rules on Criminal Procedure
A) Evidentiary fact B) Weight of evidence C) Preponderance of evidence D) Ultimate fact
A) Material B) Relevant C) Compenent D) Admissible
A) Relevant B) Material C) Competent D) Direct
A) competent B) Material C) Direct D) Relevant
A) Circumstantial B) Corroborative C) Real D) Cumulative
A) Cumulative B) Real C) Circumstantial D) Corroborative
A) Real evidence B) Admission evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Negative B) Circumstantial C) Direct D) Positive
A) Secondary B) Prima facie C) Best D) Primary
A) Primary B) Best C) Secondary D) Expert
A) Conclusive B) Real C) Primary D) Best
A) Sec 17 Bill of Rights B) Sec 12 Bill of Rights C) Sec 3 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Notice B) Judicial knowledge C) Judicial Admission D) Cognizance
A) Res gestae B) Confusing C) Misleading D) Leading
A) Material evidence B) Positive evidence C) Relevant evidence D) Negative evidence
A) Motion to postpone B) Plea to dismiss C) Motion to inhibit D) Motion to dismiss
A) All of these B) There is more than one circumstance C) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved D) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
A) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the B) The accused must be the doer of the act C) Some person is criminally liable for the act. D) That a certain result has been produced.
A) Both B and C B) Testimony of the one who made the writing C) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer D) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing.
A) Genuine document B) Holographic document C) Public Document D) Private Document
A) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. B) Any of the foregoing. C) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. D) A questioned document examiner.
A) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. B) Any of the foregoing C) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. D) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings.
A) After the oath of taken by the witness B) Before testimony of the witness C) After testimony D) After the oath of taken by the witness
A) During the cross examination B) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. C) After the testimony of the witness D) After the direct examination of the witness.
A) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena B) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. C) Prompt the court to accept it. D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) d. None of these B) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. C) Before it has been offered in evidence D) After it has been offered in evidence d wit
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Preponderance of evidence C) Weight of evidence D) Sufficiency of evidence
A) After pre trial B) During pre-trial C) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants D) After a party's testimonial evidence
A) By contradictory evidence B) When they relate to preliminary matters. C) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. D) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness.
A) A feeble minded person B) A child of tender age C) A deaf-mute person D) A registered voter
A) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. B) In case of a hostile witness. C) Any of the foregoing. D) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party.
A) In case of a hostile witness B) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony. C) By contradictory evidence D) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad.
A) Oral testimony B) Testimonial evidence C) Deposition D) Extra judicial statements
A) Of legal age B) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based C) Extensive Training and Education D) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case
A) The statement must be spontaneous. B) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. C) There must be a startling occurrence D) It must exist previous to the controversy
A) Capacity of communication B) Capacity of recollection C) Capacity of knowledge D) Capacity of observation
A) Authentic document B) Genuine document C) Questioned document D) Holographic document
A) Alterations B) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer C) Collusion between in parties D) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd |