A) Indignity B) Scandal C) Disgrace D) Unjust vexation
A) If the man is legally married B) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling C) If the mistress is a relative D) If the mistress is a virgin
A) Joint household B) Cohabit C) Marriage D) Live-in
A) Expert evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Oral evidence
A) Real evidence B) Relevant evidence C) Material evidence D) Object evidence
A) Incompetent evidence B) Unreal evidence C) None of these D) Inadmissible evidence
A) Forensic science B) All of these C) Undeciphered writings D) Medical science
A) Compound question B) Misleading question C) Leading question D) General question
A) Compound question B) General question C) Leading question D) Misleading question
A) General question B) Misleading question C) Leading question D) Compound question
A) None of these B) Capacity of recollection C) Capacity of observation D) Capacity of communication
A) Resistance on the part of the victim B) Sterility of the offender C) Use of force or intimidation by the offender D) All of the foregoing
A) When it is competent B) When it is relevant to the issue C) All of the foregoing D) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court
A) Judicial notice B) Judicial admissions C) Pleadings D) Judicial confessions
A) Secondary evidence B) Primary or best evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Competent evidence
A) Secondary evidence B) Competent evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Primary or best evidence
A) Best evidence rule B) Parol evidence rule C) Res Gestae rule D) Hearsay rule
A) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other B) The spouses was legally married C) The husband is a party to the case D) The wife is a party to the case
A) Confidential communication B) Private communication C) Privilege communication D) Dying declaration
A) Communication was made in the course of professional employment B) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon C) None of the above D) Existence of an attorney client relation
A) A criminal case by one the parent against the other B) All of the foregoing C) A crime against him D) A criminal case by one grandparent against another
A) Contract B) Compromise C) Plea bargaining D) Stipulation
A) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor B) Admission by conspirator C) Admission by agent or privies D) All of the foregoing
A) All of the foregoing B) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority C) The admission was made during the existence of the agency D) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself
A) None of the above B) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death C) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts D) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry
A) Presumption B) Conclusive presumption C) Disputable D) Stoppel
A) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent. B) A contradictory evidence C) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude D) None of the above
A) Official record B) Blotter C) Judicial Record D) Judicial notice
A) There is more than one circumstance B) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established C) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven D) All of the foregoing
A) Some person is criminally responsible for the act B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act C) Non of the foregoing D) That a certain result has been produced
A) Privileged conversation B) Parental privilege C) Dying declaration D) Filial privilege
A) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime B) Evidence against the accused C) Means that the accused is not the owner D) Prima facie evidence of fencing
A) Cumulative B) Relevant C) Corroborative D) Circumstantial
A) Material B) Real C) Testimonial D) Corroborative
A) Client B) Secretary C) Patient D) Penitent
A) Sick persons B) Children C) Homosexuals and lesbians D) Insane persons
A) Best evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Res gestae D) Real evidence
A) Admissibility B) Qualification C) Competency D) Eligibility
A) Evidence B) Motive C) Proof D) Intent
A) Original B) Genuine C) Authentic D) Duplicate
A) Ante mortern statement B) Dead man statute C) Mi ultimo adios D) Parol evidence
A) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness B) They have not reached the age of discernment. C) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify D) They understand the obligation of the oath
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Ultimate fact C) Substantial evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) Res gestae B) Factum probandum C) Owes probandi D) Factum probans
A) Defense B) Prosecution C) Clerk of court D) Witness
A) Extra-judicial confession B) Confession C) Admission D) Testimony
A) Admission B) Extra-judicial C) Confession D) Judicial confession
A) Res gestae B) Dying declaration C) Hearsay D) Testimonial evidence
A) Tradition B) Pedigree C) Inheritance D) Heritage
A) Owes probandi B) Factum probans C) Owe probandi D) Factum probandum
A) Weight of evidence B) Evidentiary fact C) Ultimate fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Best evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Weight of evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Autoptic evidence B) Corpus delicti C) Physical evidence D) Real evidence
A) There is more than one circumstance B) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved C) It must be of judicial recognizance D) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
A) 2 B) 3 C) 1 D) None
A) Disputable presumption B) Presumption C) Conclusion D) Conclusive presumptions
A) Res gestae B) Burden of evidence C) Burden of proff D) Estoppel
A) Burden of proof B) Estoppel C) Res gestae D) Burden of evidence
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Estoppel D) Misleading
A) Official record B) Private document C) Official document D) Public document
A) Evidence B) Proof C) Positive identification D) Testimony
A) Constitution B) Rules of Court C) Rules on Criminal Procedure D) Revised Penal Code
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Evidentiary fact C) Ultimate fact D) Weight of evidence
A) Admissible B) Material C) Relevant D) Compenent
A) Competent B) Material C) Relevant D) Direct
A) Material B) Relevant C) competent D) Direct
A) Corroborative B) Cumulative C) Real D) Circumstantial
A) Circumstantial B) Cumulative C) Corroborative D) Real
A) Testimonial evidence B) Real evidence C) Admission evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Positive B) Direct C) Negative D) Circumstantial
A) Secondary B) Primary C) Prima facie D) Best
A) Expert B) Primary C) Secondary D) Best
A) Primary B) Real C) Conclusive D) Best
A) Sec 3 Bill of Rights B) Sec 12 Bill of Rights C) Sec 17 Bill of Rights
A) Cognizance B) Judicial Notice C) Judicial Admission D) Judicial knowledge
A) Misleading B) Leading C) Res gestae D) Confusing
A) Material evidence B) Relevant evidence C) Positive evidence D) Negative evidence
A) Motion to inhibit B) Motion to postpone C) Motion to dismiss D) Plea to dismiss
A) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) All of these C) There is more than one circumstance D) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved
A) That a certain result has been produced. B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the C) The accused must be the doer of the act D) Some person is criminally liable for the act.
A) Testimony of the one who made the writing B) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. C) Both B and C D) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer
A) Private Document B) Holographic document C) Public Document D) Genuine document
A) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. B) Any of the foregoing. C) A questioned document examiner. D) Secretary of the accused for 20 years.
A) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. B) Any of the foregoing C) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. D) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings.
A) After the oath of taken by the witness B) Before testimony of the witness C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) After testimony
A) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. B) After the testimony of the witness C) During the cross examination D) After the direct examination of the witness.
A) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena B) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. C) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record D) Prompt the court to accept it.
A) After it has been offered in evidence d wit B) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. C) d. None of these D) Before it has been offered in evidence
A) Weight of evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Sufficiency of evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) After a party's testimonial evidence B) During pre-trial C) After pre trial D) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants
A) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. B) When they relate to preliminary matters. C) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. D) By contradictory evidence
A) A feeble minded person B) A registered voter C) A deaf-mute person D) A child of tender age
A) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. B) In case of a hostile witness. C) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party. D) Any of the foregoing.
A) In case of a hostile witness B) By contradictory evidence C) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. D) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony.
A) Extra judicial statements B) Testimonial evidence C) Oral testimony D) Deposition
A) Of legal age B) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based C) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case D) Extensive Training and Education
A) There must be a startling occurrence B) It must exist previous to the controversy C) The statement must be spontaneous. D) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance.
A) Capacity of observation B) Capacity of knowledge C) Capacity of communication D) Capacity of recollection
A) Questioned document B) Holographic document C) Authentic document D) Genuine document
A) Collusion between in parties B) Alterations C) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer D) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd |