A) Indignity B) Unjust vexation C) Disgrace D) Scandal
A) If the mistress is a relative B) If the man is legally married C) If the mistress is a virgin D) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling
A) Cohabit B) Marriage C) Joint household D) Live-in
A) Expert evidence B) Testimonial evidence C) Oral evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Material evidence B) Relevant evidence C) Object evidence D) Real evidence
A) Inadmissible evidence B) Unreal evidence C) None of these D) Incompetent evidence
A) All of these B) Undeciphered writings C) Forensic science D) Medical science
A) Compound question B) Misleading question C) Leading question D) General question
A) General question B) Misleading question C) Compound question D) Leading question
A) Compound question B) Misleading question C) General question D) Leading question
A) Capacity of observation B) Capacity of recollection C) Capacity of communication D) None of these
A) Sterility of the offender B) All of the foregoing C) Use of force or intimidation by the offender D) Resistance on the part of the victim
A) When it is competent B) When it is relevant to the issue C) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court D) All of the foregoing
A) Pleadings B) Judicial notice C) Judicial confessions D) Judicial admissions
A) Secondary evidence B) Primary or best evidence C) Competent evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Competent evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Res Gestae rule B) Hearsay rule C) Parol evidence rule D) Best evidence rule
A) The husband is a party to the case B) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other C) The spouses was legally married D) The wife is a party to the case
A) Dying declaration B) Confidential communication C) Private communication D) Privilege communication
A) None of the above B) Existence of an attorney client relation C) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon D) Communication was made in the course of professional employment
A) A crime against him B) A criminal case by one grandparent against another C) All of the foregoing D) A criminal case by one the parent against the other
A) Stipulation B) Contract C) Compromise D) Plea bargaining
A) Admission by agent or privies B) Admission by conspirator C) All of the foregoing D) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor
A) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself B) The admission was made during the existence of the agency C) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority D) All of the foregoing
A) None of the above B) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts
A) Disputable B) Conclusive presumption C) Stoppel D) Presumption
A) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude B) A contradictory evidence C) None of the above D) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent.
A) Blotter B) Judicial Record C) Official record D) Judicial notice
A) All of the foregoing B) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven C) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established D) There is more than one circumstance
A) Some person is criminally responsible for the act B) Non of the foregoing C) That a certain result has been produced D) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act
A) Privileged conversation B) Parental privilege C) Dying declaration D) Filial privilege
A) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime B) Evidence against the accused C) Means that the accused is not the owner D) Prima facie evidence of fencing
A) Circumstantial B) Corroborative C) Cumulative D) Relevant
A) Material B) Real C) Testimonial D) Corroborative
A) Penitent B) Client C) Secretary D) Patient
A) Children B) Homosexuals and lesbians C) Insane persons D) Sick persons
A) Secondary evidence B) Res gestae C) Best evidence D) Real evidence
A) Qualification B) Admissibility C) Eligibility D) Competency
A) Proof B) Evidence C) Motive D) Intent
A) Genuine B) Duplicate C) Original D) Authentic
A) Mi ultimo adios B) Ante mortern statement C) Dead man statute D) Parol evidence
A) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify B) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness C) They have not reached the age of discernment. D) They understand the obligation of the oath
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Ultimate fact C) Preponderance of evidence D) Substantial evidence
A) Owes probandi B) Factum probans C) Res gestae D) Factum probandum
A) Defense B) Clerk of court C) Witness D) Prosecution
A) Confession B) Extra-judicial confession C) Testimony D) Admission
A) Confession B) Admission C) Judicial confession D) Extra-judicial
A) Dying declaration B) Hearsay C) Testimonial evidence D) Res gestae
A) Pedigree B) Inheritance C) Tradition D) Heritage
A) Factum probandum B) Factum probans C) Owes probandi D) Owe probandi
A) Weight of evidence B) Evidentiary fact C) Preponderance of evidence D) Ultimate fact
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Best evidence C) Secondary evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Autoptic evidence B) Real evidence C) Physical evidence D) Corpus delicti
A) There is more than one circumstance B) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved C) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) It must be of judicial recognizance
A) 2 B) 3 C) None D) 1
A) Conclusive presumptions B) Disputable presumption C) Presumption D) Conclusion
A) Res gestae B) Estoppel C) Burden of evidence D) Burden of proff
A) Res gestae B) Burden of evidence C) Estoppel D) Burden of proof
A) Res gestae B) Leading C) Estoppel D) Misleading
A) Private document B) Official record C) Official document D) Public document
A) Positive identification B) Testimony C) Proof D) Evidence
A) Rules of Court B) Revised Penal Code C) Constitution D) Rules on Criminal Procedure
A) Ultimate fact B) Evidentiary fact C) Preponderance of evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Relevant B) Compenent C) Admissible D) Material
A) Direct B) Relevant C) Material D) Competent
A) Relevant B) competent C) Material D) Direct
A) Real B) Corroborative C) Cumulative D) Circumstantial
A) Corroborative B) Real C) Circumstantial D) Cumulative
A) Admission evidence B) Testimonial evidence C) Documentary evidence D) Real evidence
A) Circumstantial B) Positive C) Negative D) Direct
A) Primary B) Best C) Prima facie D) Secondary
A) Best B) Secondary C) Primary D) Expert
A) Conclusive B) Primary C) Best D) Real
A) Sec 12 Bill of Rights B) Sec 3 Bill of Rights C) Sec 17 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Admission B) Judicial knowledge C) Cognizance D) Judicial Notice
A) Leading B) Misleading C) Res gestae D) Confusing
A) Relevant evidence B) Material evidence C) Negative evidence D) Positive evidence
A) Plea to dismiss B) Motion to postpone C) Motion to dismiss D) Motion to inhibit
A) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) There is more than one circumstance C) All of these D) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved
A) That a certain result has been produced. B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the C) Some person is criminally liable for the act. D) The accused must be the doer of the act
A) Testimony of the one who made the writing B) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. C) Both B and C D) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer
A) Private Document B) Holographic document C) Genuine document D) Public Document
A) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. B) Any of the foregoing. C) A questioned document examiner. D) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years.
A) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. B) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. C) Any of the foregoing D) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings.
A) After the oath of taken by the witness B) Before testimony of the witness C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) After testimony
A) During the cross examination B) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. C) After the testimony of the witness D) After the direct examination of the witness.
A) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record B) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena C) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. D) Prompt the court to accept it.
A) d. None of these B) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. C) After it has been offered in evidence d wit D) Before it has been offered in evidence
A) Weight of evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Sufficiency of evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants B) After a party's testimonial evidence C) After pre trial D) During pre-trial
A) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. B) When they relate to preliminary matters. C) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. D) By contradictory evidence
A) A child of tender age B) A deaf-mute person C) A registered voter D) A feeble minded person
A) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party. B) In case of a hostile witness. C) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. D) Any of the foregoing.
A) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony. B) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. C) In case of a hostile witness D) By contradictory evidence
A) Oral testimony B) Deposition C) Testimonial evidence D) Extra judicial statements
A) Extensive Training and Education B) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case C) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based D) Of legal age
A) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. B) It must exist previous to the controversy C) There must be a startling occurrence D) The statement must be spontaneous.
A) Capacity of knowledge B) Capacity of observation C) Capacity of communication D) Capacity of recollection
A) Questioned document B) Genuine document C) Authentic document D) Holographic document
A) Collusion between in parties B) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer C) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd D) Alterations |