A) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses B) A) To summarize the article C) C) To write a personal opinion about the article D) D) To translate the article into simpler language E) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses
A) C) Rewriting the article B) B) Analyzing the author's argument C) A) Summarizing the article D) C) Rewriting the article E) D) Discussing the article's relevance to the field
A) D) The author’s credentials B) A) The length of the article C) B) The structure and organization of the article D) B) The structure and organization of the article E) C) The number of references
A) A) Is the author famous? B) D) How long is the article? C) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant? D) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant? E) B) Does the article include personal anecdotes?
A) B) Lack of peer review B) B) Lack of peer review C) A) Clear introduction D) C) Excessive use of charts and graphs E) D) Ambiguous conclusion
A) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow B) A) The article lacks structure C) C) The introduction is lengthy D) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow E) D) The article is overly complex
A) D) A critique only includes the author's opinion B) C) A critique doesn’t discuss strengths C) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it D) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it E) B) A critique is shorter than a summary
A) C) Noting whether the article is too long B) D) All of the above C) B) Discussing whether the writing is engaging and clear D) A) Identifying spelling and grammar errors E) D) All of the above
A) B) If the conclusion agrees with the introduction B) C) The length of the conclusion C) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions D) D) The number of sources in the conclusion E) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions
A) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives B) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives C) A) They should always be ignored D) B) They help strengthen the article’s main argument E) D) They are irrelevant and unnecessary in a critique |