A) P.D. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) C.A. 3815 D) Act No. 3815
A) The Revised Penal Code B) Republic Acts C) Acts D) Presidential Decrees
A) Com. Act No. B) P.D. No. C) R.A. No. D) Act No.
A) Law No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) R.A. No.
A) Power of expropriation B) Power of eminent domain C) State power D) Police power
A) Batas Blg. B) R.A. No. C) Act No. D) P.D. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) None of these. B) It means that the law be just. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Positivist theory B) Classical theory C) Empirical theory D) Tradition theory
A) An occasional stay B) A fixed stay. C) None of these. D) A temporary stay
A) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. B) Cover up for a crime. C) None of these. D) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious.
A) General application of laws B) Bill of attainder C) Equal protection D) Due process
A) Juristic B) Jurisdctional C) Traditional D) Territorial
A) Punishment to spite someone. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment for someone being hated.
A) Ambassadors B) Consuls C) Consultants D) Envoys
A) Empirical theory B) Positivist theory C) Classical theory D) Traditional theory
A) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. B) Expand the law or congressional act. C) None of these. D) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act).
A) English rule B) American rule C) French rule D) British rule
A) Clumsiness B) Negligence C) Felony D) Imprudence
A) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions were negligent. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. D) All of these are correct.
A) English rule B) British rule C) Frech rule D) American rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Probable felonies C) Culpable felonies D) Mala in se
A) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. B) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. C) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. D) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines.
A) English rule B) European rule C) American rule D) British rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Lack of intelligence B) Lack of criminal intent C) Lack of freedom D) Mistake of fact
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the criminal mind of the person. C) By the prior acts of a person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. B) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Mala in se B) Special crime C) Heinous crime D) Mala prohibita
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) A man is defined by his vert acts. B) The act of a man defines him. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) Violent strike B) Praeter intentionem C) Excess of force D) None of these.
A) Lack of foresight. B) Imprudence C) Clumsiness D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Such defense is illegal. B) Such defense will not exonerate X. C) None of these. D) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) Parricide because the victim was his own father. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. D) None of these.
A) Imprudence B) Omission C) Negligence D) Culpa
A) Mens rea B) Proximate cause C) Intent D) Motive
A) Prejudice B) Bias C) Motive D) Intent
A) Mistake in the aim B) Mistake victim C) Mistake in the blow D) None of these.
A) Legislative B) Executive C) Judicial D) Political
A) Intelligence B) Intent C) All of these. D) Freedom
A) Intent B) Fraud C) Omission D) Act |