A) R.A. 3815 B) C.A. 3815 C) Act No. 3815 D) P.D. 3815
A) Acts B) The Revised Penal Code C) Republic Acts D) Presidential Decrees
A) R.A. No. B) Com. Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Act No.
A) Act No. B) R.A. No. C) Law No. D) P.D. No.
A) Power of expropriation B) Police power C) Power of eminent domain D) State power
A) P.D. No. B) Batas Blg. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1933 B) Jan. 1, 1931 C) Jan. 1, 1930 D) Jan. 1, 1932
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) It means that laws be lenient. B) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. C) It means that the law be just. D) None of these.
A) Positivist theory B) Tradition theory C) Classical theory D) Empirical theory
A) A fixed stay. B) None of these. C) A temporary stay D) An occasional stay
A) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. B) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. C) Cover up for a crime. D) None of these.
A) Due process B) Equal protection C) Bill of attainder D) General application of laws
A) Traditional B) Juristic C) Territorial D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment to spite someone. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment for someone being hated.
A) Ambassadors B) Consuls C) Envoys D) Consultants
A) Classical theory B) Traditional theory C) Empirical theory D) Positivist theory
A) None of these. B) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. C) Expand the law or congressional act. D) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act).
A) British rule B) American rule C) French rule D) English rule
A) Negligence B) Imprudence C) Clumsiness D) Felony
A) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines.
A) All of these are correct. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) No, because X and his companions were negligent. D) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock.
A) British rule B) Frech rule C) English rule D) American rule
A) Mala in se B) Probable felonies C) Culpable felonies D) Mala prohibita
A) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. B) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. C) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. D) Yes, because criminal law is territorial.
A) European rule B) English rule C) British rule D) American rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of intelligence C) Lack of criminal intent D) Lack of freedom
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the criminal tendency of a person. C) By the prior acts of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind.
A) Mala in se B) Special crime C) Heinous crime D) Mala prohibita
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) A man is defined by his vert acts. B) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. C) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. D) The act of a man defines him.
A) Violent strike B) None of these. C) Praeter intentionem D) Excess of force
A) Clumsiness B) Lack of foresight. C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense is illegal. C) None of these. D) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) None of these. B) Parricide because the victim was his own father. C) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. D) Murder because the intended victim was A.
A) Culpa B) Omission C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Motive C) Intent D) Proximate cause
A) Intent B) Prejudice C) Motive D) Bias
A) Mistake victim B) Mistake in the blow C) None of these. D) Mistake in the aim
A) Executive B) Judicial C) Legislative D) Political
A) All of these. B) Freedom C) Intent D) Intelligence
A) Fraud B) Intent C) Act D) Omission |