A) R.A. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) Act No. 3815 D) C.A. 3815
A) The Revised Penal Code B) Presidential Decrees C) Acts D) Republic Acts
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) Com. Act No. D) P.D. No.
A) P.D. No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) Law No.
A) State power B) Power of expropriation C) Police power D) Power of eminent domain
A) Act No. B) R.A. No. C) Batas Blg. D) P.D. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1931 B) Jan. 1, 1933 C) Jan. 1, 1930 D) Jan. 1, 1932
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) It means that the law be just. B) None of these. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Empirical theory D) Tradition theory
A) None of these. B) A temporary stay C) An occasional stay D) A fixed stay.
A) None of these. B) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. C) Cover up for a crime. D) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious.
A) General application of laws B) Bill of attainder C) Due process D) Equal protection
A) Jurisdctional B) Territorial C) Traditional D) Juristic
A) Punishment to spite someone. B) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. C) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. D) Punishment for someone being hated.
A) Envoys B) Consuls C) Ambassadors D) Consultants
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Empirical theory D) Traditional theory
A) None of these. B) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. C) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). D) Expand the law or congressional act.
A) American rule B) French rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) Felony B) Negligence C) Imprudence D) Clumsiness
A) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines.
A) All of these are correct. B) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) American rule B) Frech rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) Culpable felonies B) Probable felonies C) Mala in se D) Mala prohibita
A) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. D) Yes, because criminal law is territorial.
A) English rule B) European rule C) British rule D) American rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Lack of intelligence B) Lack of criminal intent C) Lack of freedom D) Mistake of fact
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the prior acts of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. D) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind.
A) Mala in se B) Mala prohibita C) Special crime D) Heinous crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. B) A man is defined by his vert acts. C) The act of a man defines him. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) Excess of force B) Praeter intentionem C) None of these. D) Violent strike
A) Lack of foresight. B) Clumsiness C) Negligence D) Imprudence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense will not exonerate X. B) None of these. C) Such defense is illegal. D) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) None of these. B) Parricide because the victim was his own father. C) Murder because the intended victim was A. D) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances.
A) Negligence B) Omission C) Imprudence D) Culpa
A) Proximate cause B) Mens rea C) Motive D) Intent
A) Intent B) Motive C) Prejudice D) Bias
A) Mistake in the blow B) Mistake victim C) None of these. D) Mistake in the aim
A) Legislative B) Political C) Judicial D) Executive
A) All of these. B) Freedom C) Intent D) Intelligence
A) Fraud B) Act C) Omission D) Intent |