A) C.A. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) Act No. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) The Revised Penal Code C) Presidential Decrees D) Acts
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) Com. Act No.
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Law No.
A) Police power B) Power of eminent domain C) Power of expropriation D) State power
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) Batas Blg.
A) Jan. 1, 1930 B) Jan. 1, 1931 C) Jan. 1, 1933 D) Jan. 1, 1932
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) It means that the law be just. B) None of these. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Tradition theory B) Empirical theory C) Classical theory D) Positivist theory
A) An occasional stay B) None of these. C) A temporary stay D) A fixed stay.
A) Cover up for a crime. B) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. C) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. D) None of these.
A) General application of laws B) Equal protection C) Due process D) Bill of attainder
A) Jurisdctional B) Territorial C) Traditional D) Juristic
A) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. D) Punishment for someone being hated.
A) Consultants B) Consuls C) Envoys D) Ambassadors
A) Classical theory B) Empirical theory C) Traditional theory D) Positivist theory
A) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. B) None of these. C) Expand the law or congressional act. D) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act).
A) French rule B) American rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) Clumsiness B) Imprudence C) Negligence D) Felony
A) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. B) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines.
A) All of these are correct. B) No, because X and his companions were negligent. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock.
A) English rule B) British rule C) American rule D) Frech rule
A) Probable felonies B) Culpable felonies C) Mala prohibita D) Mala in se
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. D) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction.
A) English rule B) American rule C) British rule D) European rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Lack of freedom B) Lack of criminal intent C) Mistake of fact D) Lack of intelligence
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted.
A) Special crime B) Mala in se C) Mala prohibita D) Heinous crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) A man is defined by his vert acts. B) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. C) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. D) The act of a man defines him.
A) Violent strike B) Excess of force C) None of these. D) Praeter intentionem
A) Clumsiness B) Imprudence C) Lack of foresight. D) Negligence
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) None of these. C) Such defense will not exonerate X. D) Such defense is illegal.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) Parricide because the victim was his own father. D) None of these.
A) Imprudence B) Omission C) Negligence D) Culpa
A) Motive B) Intent C) Mens rea D) Proximate cause
A) Bias B) Motive C) Prejudice D) Intent
A) None of these. B) Mistake victim C) Mistake in the aim D) Mistake in the blow
A) Executive B) Political C) Legislative D) Judicial
A) All of these. B) Freedom C) Intent D) Intelligence
A) Omission B) Fraud C) Intent D) Act |