A) Act No. 3815 B) C.A. 3815 C) R.A. 3815 D) P.D. 3815
A) Presidential Decrees B) Republic Acts C) Acts D) The Revised Penal Code
A) P.D. No. B) Com. Act No. C) R.A. No. D) Act No.
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Law No. D) Act No.
A) Power of expropriation B) State power C) Police power D) Power of eminent domain
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No. C) Act No. D) Batas Blg.
A) Jan. 1, 1933 B) Jan. 1, 1932 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1930
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. B) It means that laws be lenient. C) It means that the law be just. D) None of these.
A) Tradition theory B) Classical theory C) Empirical theory D) Positivist theory
A) A temporary stay B) None of these. C) A fixed stay. D) An occasional stay
A) None of these. B) Cover up for a crime. C) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. D) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime.
A) Due process B) Bill of attainder C) Equal protection D) General application of laws
A) Territorial B) Jurisdctional C) Traditional D) Juristic
A) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.
A) Consuls B) Envoys C) Ambassadors D) Consultants
A) Positivist theory B) Traditional theory C) Empirical theory D) Classical theory
A) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). B) Expand the law or congressional act. C) None of these. D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) British rule B) American rule C) English rule D) French rule
A) Clumsiness B) Felony C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. C) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines.
A) All of these are correct. B) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. C) No, because X and his companions were negligent. D) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target.
A) British rule B) Frech rule C) American rule D) English rule
A) Culpable felonies B) Mala prohibita C) Mala in se D) Probable felonies
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. D) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction.
A) English rule B) British rule C) European rule D) American rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of freedom C) Lack of intelligence D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the criminal mind of the person. C) By the criminal tendency of a person. D) By the prior acts of a person.
A) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. B) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Mala in se B) Mala prohibita C) Special crime D) Heinous crime
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) The act of a man defines him. B) A man is defined by his vert acts. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) Violent strike B) None of these. C) Praeter intentionem D) Excess of force
A) Clumsiness B) Negligence C) Imprudence D) Lack of foresight.
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense will not exonerate X. C) None of these. D) Such defense is illegal.
A) None of these. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. D) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) Imprudence B) Omission C) Negligence D) Culpa
A) Mens rea B) Intent C) Proximate cause D) Motive
A) Bias B) Prejudice C) Motive D) Intent
A) Mistake victim B) Mistake in the aim C) Mistake in the blow D) None of these.
A) Legislative B) Political C) Judicial D) Executive
A) All of these. B) Freedom C) Intent D) Intelligence
A) Act B) Intent C) Omission D) Fraud |