A) Act No. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) P.D. 3815 D) C.A. 3815
A) Acts B) The Revised Penal Code C) Republic Acts D) Presidential Decrees
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) Com. Act No.
A) P.D. No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) Law No.
A) Police power B) State power C) Power of expropriation D) Power of eminent domain
A) Act No. B) Batas Blg. C) R.A. No. D) P.D. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1931 C) Jan. 1, 1930 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) None of these. B) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. C) It means that the law be just. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Empirical theory D) Tradition theory
A) None of these. B) An occasional stay C) A temporary stay D) A fixed stay.
A) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. B) None of these. C) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. D) Cover up for a crime.
A) Due process B) Bill of attainder C) General application of laws D) Equal protection
A) Territorial B) Juristic C) Jurisdctional D) Traditional
A) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.
A) Envoys B) Consultants C) Consuls D) Ambassadors
A) Traditional theory B) Positivist theory C) Empirical theory D) Classical theory
A) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). B) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. C) None of these. D) Expand the law or congressional act.
A) British rule B) French rule C) American rule D) English rule
A) Felony B) Imprudence C) Clumsiness D) Negligence
A) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) All of these are correct. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) English rule B) American rule C) British rule D) Frech rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Probable felonies C) Culpable felonies D) Mala in se
A) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. B) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. C) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) European rule B) British rule C) English rule D) American rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of criminal intent C) Lack of freedom D) Lack of intelligence
A) By the criminal tendency of a person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the prior acts of a person.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. C) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. D) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind.
A) Special crime B) Mala prohibita C) Heinous crime D) Mala in se
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) The act of a man defines him. B) A man is defined by his vert acts. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) Violent strike B) Praeter intentionem C) None of these. D) Excess of force
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Lack of foresight. D) Clumsiness
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense is illegal. C) Such defense will not exonerate X. D) None of these.
A) None of these. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) Parricide because the victim was his own father. D) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances.
A) Omission B) Negligence C) Culpa D) Imprudence
A) Mens rea B) Proximate cause C) Motive D) Intent
A) Prejudice B) Bias C) Motive D) Intent
A) Mistake in the blow B) None of these. C) Mistake in the aim D) Mistake victim
A) Executive B) Political C) Judicial D) Legislative
A) Intelligence B) All of these. C) Freedom D) Intent
A) Intent B) Act C) Fraud D) Omission |