A) C.A. 3815 B) Act No. 3815 C) P.D. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) The Revised Penal Code B) Presidential Decrees C) Acts D) Republic Acts
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Com. Act No. D) Act No.
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No. C) Law No. D) Act No.
A) Power of expropriation B) State power C) Power of eminent domain D) Police power
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Batas Blg. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1931 B) Jan. 1, 1933 C) Jan. 1, 1932 D) Jan. 1, 1930
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) It means that laws be lenient. B) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. C) It means that the law be just. D) None of these.
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Tradition theory D) Empirical theory
A) An occasional stay B) A temporary stay C) A fixed stay. D) None of these.
A) Cover up for a crime. B) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. C) None of these. D) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious.
A) Due process B) Equal protection C) Bill of attainder D) General application of laws
A) Territorial B) Jurisdctional C) Traditional D) Juristic
A) Punishment to spite someone. B) Punishment for someone being hated. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages.
A) Envoys B) Consuls C) Ambassadors D) Consultants
A) Traditional theory B) Empirical theory C) Classical theory D) Positivist theory
A) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). B) Expand the law or congressional act. C) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. D) None of these.
A) American rule B) English rule C) British rule D) French rule
A) Clumsiness B) Felony C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. B) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) All of these are correct. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) English rule B) Frech rule C) British rule D) American rule
A) Mala in se B) Mala prohibita C) Culpable felonies D) Probable felonies
A) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. B) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. C) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) British rule B) American rule C) European rule D) English rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of intelligence C) Lack of freedom D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the criminal tendency of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the overt acts of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. B) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Special crime B) Mala prohibita C) Heinous crime D) Mala in se
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. B) The act of a man defines him. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) A man is defined by his vert acts.
A) Excess of force B) Praeter intentionem C) None of these. D) Violent strike
A) Lack of foresight. B) Imprudence C) Clumsiness D) Negligence
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) None of these. B) Such defense will exonerate X. C) Such defense will not exonerate X. D) Such defense is illegal.
A) Parricide because the victim was his own father. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) None of these. D) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances.
A) Culpa B) Omission C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) Intent B) Mens rea C) Proximate cause D) Motive
A) Bias B) Prejudice C) Motive D) Intent
A) None of these. B) Mistake in the blow C) Mistake victim D) Mistake in the aim
A) Legislative B) Executive C) Judicial D) Political
A) All of these. B) Intelligence C) Intent D) Freedom
A) Act B) Fraud C) Intent D) Omission |