A) R.A. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) C.A. 3815 D) Act No. 3815
A) Acts B) The Revised Penal Code C) Republic Acts D) Presidential Decrees
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Com. Act No.
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Law No.
A) Power of eminent domain B) Power of expropriation C) State power D) Police power
A) Batas Blg. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1931 B) Jan. 1, 1933 C) Jan. 1, 1930 D) Jan. 1, 1932
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) It means that the law be just. B) None of these. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Classical theory B) Empirical theory C) Tradition theory D) Positivist theory
A) A temporary stay B) A fixed stay. C) None of these. D) An occasional stay
A) None of these. B) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. C) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. D) Cover up for a crime.
A) Due process B) Equal protection C) Bill of attainder D) General application of laws
A) Territorial B) Juristic C) Jurisdctional D) Traditional
A) Punishment to spite someone. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.
A) Ambassadors B) Consultants C) Consuls D) Envoys
A) Classical theory B) Empirical theory C) Traditional theory D) Positivist theory
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. D) None of these.
A) English rule B) French rule C) British rule D) American rule
A) Felony B) Clumsiness C) Negligence D) Imprudence
A) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions were negligent. B) All of these are correct. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock.
A) American rule B) Frech rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) Culpable felonies B) Probable felonies C) Mala prohibita D) Mala in se
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. D) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction.
A) American rule B) English rule C) European rule D) British rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Lack of freedom B) Lack of intelligence C) Mistake of fact D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the criminal mind of the person. C) By the prior acts of a person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted.
A) Heinous crime B) Mala in se C) Special crime D) Mala prohibita
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. B) A man is defined by his vert acts. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) The act of a man defines him.
A) None of these. B) Praeter intentionem C) Violent strike D) Excess of force
A) Lack of foresight. B) Imprudence C) Clumsiness D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Such defense will not exonerate X. B) None of these. C) Such defense will exonerate X. D) Such defense is illegal.
A) None of these. B) Parricide because the victim was his own father. C) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. D) Murder because the intended victim was A.
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Culpa D) Omission
A) Proximate cause B) Intent C) Mens rea D) Motive
A) Intent B) Prejudice C) Bias D) Motive
A) Mistake in the aim B) None of these. C) Mistake in the blow D) Mistake victim
A) Political B) Executive C) Legislative D) Judicial
A) Intelligence B) Freedom C) All of these. D) Intent
A) Act B) Fraud C) Omission D) Intent |