A) Act No. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) P.D. 3815 D) C.A. 3815
A) Presidential Decrees B) Acts C) The Revised Penal Code D) Republic Acts
A) Com. Act No. B) R.A. No. C) P.D. No. D) Act No.
A) P.D. No. B) Law No. C) R.A. No. D) Act No.
A) Power of expropriation B) Power of eminent domain C) State power D) Police power
A) Act No. B) Batas Blg. C) P.D. No. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1933 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1932
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) None of these. B) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. C) It means that laws be lenient. D) It means that the law be just.
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Empirical theory D) Tradition theory
A) A temporary stay B) An occasional stay C) A fixed stay. D) None of these.
A) None of these. B) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. C) Cover up for a crime. D) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime.
A) General application of laws B) Bill of attainder C) Due process D) Equal protection
A) Territorial B) Juristic C) Jurisdctional D) Traditional
A) Punishment to spite someone. B) Punishment for someone being hated. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages.
A) Consultants B) Envoys C) Ambassadors D) Consuls
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Traditional theory D) Empirical theory
A) None of these. B) Expand the law or congressional act. C) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) American rule B) British rule C) English rule D) French rule
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Felony D) Clumsiness
A) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines.
A) All of these are correct. B) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) English rule B) British rule C) Frech rule D) American rule
A) Mala in se B) Culpable felonies C) Probable felonies D) Mala prohibita
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) European rule B) American rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of criminal intent C) Lack of freedom D) Lack of intelligence
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the prior acts of a person. C) By the criminal tendency of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Mala prohibita B) Mala in se C) Heinous crime D) Special crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) A man is defined by his vert acts. B) The act of a man defines him. C) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. D) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts.
A) Violent strike B) Praeter intentionem C) Excess of force D) None of these.
A) Negligence B) Lack of foresight. C) Imprudence D) Clumsiness
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Such defense will not exonerate X. B) Such defense is illegal. C) None of these. D) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) None of these. B) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. C) Murder because the intended victim was A. D) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) Culpa B) Negligence C) Imprudence D) Omission
A) Intent B) Mens rea C) Proximate cause D) Motive
A) Bias B) Motive C) Intent D) Prejudice
A) Mistake in the blow B) None of these. C) Mistake victim D) Mistake in the aim
A) Executive B) Legislative C) Political D) Judicial
A) Intelligence B) Freedom C) All of these. D) Intent
A) Fraud B) Omission C) Act D) Intent |