A) C.A. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) R.A. 3815 D) Act No. 3815
A) The Revised Penal Code B) Acts C) Presidential Decrees D) Republic Acts
A) Com. Act No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) P.D. No.
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Law No.
A) Power of expropriation B) State power C) Power of eminent domain D) Police power
A) Batas Blg. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) It means that laws be lenient. B) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. C) None of these. D) It means that the law be just.
A) Positivist theory B) Classical theory C) Tradition theory D) Empirical theory
A) An occasional stay B) None of these. C) A temporary stay D) A fixed stay.
A) Cover up for a crime. B) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. C) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. D) None of these.
A) General application of laws B) Equal protection C) Bill of attainder D) Due process
A) Jurisdctional B) Territorial C) Juristic D) Traditional
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. D) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.
A) Consuls B) Consultants C) Ambassadors D) Envoys
A) Empirical theory B) Traditional theory C) Classical theory D) Positivist theory
A) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. B) Expand the law or congressional act. C) None of these. D) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act).
A) British rule B) American rule C) English rule D) French rule
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Felony D) Clumsiness
A) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. B) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) All of these are correct. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) English rule B) American rule C) Frech rule D) British rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Probable felonies C) Mala in se D) Culpable felonies
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. C) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) American rule B) European rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Lack of criminal intent B) Lack of intelligence C) Mistake of fact D) Lack of freedom
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the criminal tendency of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the prior acts of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Special crime B) Mala in se C) Mala prohibita D) Heinous crime
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. B) The act of a man defines him. C) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. D) A man is defined by his vert acts.
A) Excess of force B) Praeter intentionem C) Violent strike D) None of these.
A) Clumsiness B) Imprudence C) Lack of foresight. D) Negligence
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) None of these. B) Such defense will not exonerate X. C) Such defense will exonerate X. D) Such defense is illegal.
A) None of these. B) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. C) Murder because the intended victim was A. D) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) Omission B) Culpa C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Intent C) Motive D) Proximate cause
A) Motive B) Bias C) Prejudice D) Intent
A) Mistake in the blow B) None of these. C) Mistake in the aim D) Mistake victim
A) Legislative B) Political C) Executive D) Judicial
A) Intelligence B) All of these. C) Intent D) Freedom
A) Intent B) Omission C) Act D) Fraud |