A) Empirical theory B) Positivist theory C) Traditional theory D) Classical theory
A) Mala prohibita crimes B) Crimes under special laws C) Mala in se crimes D) Felonies under the Revised Penal Code
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by law C) Acts and omissions defined as crimes D) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) Proximate cause B) Motive C) Mens rea D) Intent
A) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime. B) Yes, x is still liable for the death of Y because X was irked. C) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime. D) Yes, X is liable for the death of X even if he had no intention of inflicting upon him a more serious harm because a person is liable or a felony even if the wrongful act be different from that intended.
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. D) None of these.
A) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Such defense will not exonerate X. B) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) Taxes B) Bills C) Exactions D) Tax
A) (Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating B) Yes aggravating without warrant C) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) None of the above. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. C) All of these are correct.
A) Romance B) Motive C) Intent D) Intention
A) 'An act of a man is his very own act.' B) 'An act done by me against my will is not my act" C) 'An act of a man cannot be ascribed to another man.' D) None of these.
A) By the criminal tendency of a person. B) By the prior acts of a person. C) By the overt acts of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) French rule B) British rule C) American rule D) English rule
A) Mens rea B) Motive C) Criminal design D) Intent
A) People power B) Power of expropriation C) Presidential Power D) Police power
A) Com. Act No. B) P.D. No. C) BatasBlg.
A) Com. Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) Batas Blg.
A) Batas Blg. B) P.D. No. C) Com. Act No. D) Act No.
A) R.A. 3815 B) Batas Blg. 3815 C) P.D. No. 3815 D) Act No. 3815
A) Law No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) R.A. No.
A) All of these. B) X may raise mistake of fact as a defense. C) X may raise intense fear as a defense. D) X may raise lack of intent as a defense.
A) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. B) None of these.
A) Intent B) Imprudence
A) Impossible crime B) Murder C) Homicide D) Manslaughter
A) Positivist theory B) Classical theory C) Empirical theory D) Tradition theory
A) Traditional B) Territorial C) Jurisdctional D) Juristic
A) X will be liable for an impossible crime and will be punished for his criminal propensity. B) X will have no criminal liability because he cannot be a theft of his own wallet. C) X will be liable for his ill motive. D) X will be for pickpocketing because he has criminal tendency.
A) None of these. B) It means that the law be just. C) It means that laws be lenient. D) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly.
A) Those provided for by the Revised PenalCode B) Mala in se crimes C) Mala prohibita crimes D) Special penal laws
A) Error in identify B) Mistake of target C) Error in personae D) Mistake of fact
A) Yes, because X was aiming at a different person. B) Yes, because there is criminal intent to kill. C) Yes, because a person committing a felony is liable for any result therefrom. D) Yes, because a felony is always a felony.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1933 C) Jan. 1, 1930 D) Jan. 1, 1931
A) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. B) X may not be liable because his wife may not file a case anymore. C) None of these. D) X is not liable because it is against public policy to charge a husband.
A) None of these. B) Excess of force C) Violent strike D) Praeter intentionem
A) Mala in se B) Probable felonies C) Mala prohibita D) Culpable felonies
A) English rule B) American rule C) British rule D) European rule
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. D) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.
A) None of these. B) Power of eminent domain C) Power of Expropriation D) Power of taxation
A) Lack of foresight B) Freedom C) Intelligence D) Intent
A) Criminal design B) Mens rea C) Motive D) Intent
A) American rule B) German rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) Mala probihita B) Mala in se C) Culpable felonies |