A) Empirical theory B) Positivist theory C) Classical theory D) Traditional theory
A) Mala prohibita crimes B) Felonies under the Revised Penal Code C) Crimes under special laws D) Mala in se crimes
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code C) Acts and omissions defined as crimes D) Acts and omissions punishable by law
A) Mens rea B) Motive C) Proximate cause D) Intent
A) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime. B) Yes, x is still liable for the death of Y because X was irked. C) Yes, X is liable for the death of X even if he had no intention of inflicting upon him a more serious harm because a person is liable or a felony even if the wrongful act be different from that intended. D) Yes, X is still liable because killing is a crime.
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. C) None of these. D) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act).
A) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. B) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Tax B) Taxes C) Exactions D) Bills
A) Yes aggravating without warrant B) Parricide because the victim was his own father. C) (Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct. C) None of the above.
A) Intention B) Romance C) Intent D) Motive
A) None of these. B) 'An act done by me against my will is not my act" C) 'An act of a man cannot be ascribed to another man.' D) 'An act of a man is his very own act.'
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the criminal tendency of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the overt acts of a person.
A) British rule B) English rule C) American rule D) French rule
A) Criminal design B) Mens rea C) Motive D) Intent
A) Power of expropriation B) People power C) Presidential Power D) Police power
A) BatasBlg. B) Com. Act No. C) P.D. No.
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Batas Blg. D) Com. Act No.
A) Act No. B) Com. Act No. C) Batas Blg. D) P.D. No.
A) Act No. 3815 B) P.D. No. 3815 C) Batas Blg. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Law No. B) R.A. No. C) P.D. No. D) Act No.
A) X may raise mistake of fact as a defense. B) All of these. C) X may raise intense fear as a defense. D) X may raise lack of intent as a defense.
A) None of these. B) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism.
A) Intent B) Imprudence
A) Impossible crime B) Murder C) Manslaughter D) Homicide
A) Empirical theory B) Classical theory C) Tradition theory D) Positivist theory
A) Jurisdctional B) Traditional C) Territorial D) Juristic
A) X will have no criminal liability because he cannot be a theft of his own wallet. B) X will be liable for his ill motive. C) X will be for pickpocketing because he has criminal tendency. D) X will be liable for an impossible crime and will be punished for his criminal propensity.
A) It means that the law be just. B) None of these. C) It means that laws be lenient. D) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly.
A) Those provided for by the Revised PenalCode B) Mala prohibita crimes C) Special penal laws D) Mala in se crimes
A) Error in personae B) Mistake of fact C) Mistake of target D) Error in identify
A) Yes, because a felony is always a felony. B) Yes, because there is criminal intent to kill. C) Yes, because X was aiming at a different person. D) Yes, because a person committing a felony is liable for any result therefrom.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1933 D) Jan. 1, 1931
A) X may not be convicted of parricide because there was lack of intelligence since X was in a state of somnambulism. B) X may not be liable because his wife may not file a case anymore. C) None of these. D) X is not liable because it is against public policy to charge a husband.
A) Praeter intentionem B) Violent strike C) None of these. D) Excess of force
A) Mala in se B) Mala prohibita C) Probable felonies D) Culpable felonies
A) American rule B) European rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these. C) Power of eminent domain D) Power of Expropriation
A) Lack of foresight B) Intent C) Freedom D) Intelligence
A) Intent B) Criminal design C) Mens rea D) Motive
A) British rule B) English rule C) American rule D) German rule
A) Mala probihita B) Culpable felonies C) Mala in se |