A) Internal staff members B) Government regulators C) Human resource managers D) Unions and AIRC
A) The Howard government B) The Hawke government C) The Fraser government D) The Keating government
A) Private business sector B) Government administration C) Public manufacturing sector D) Healthcare sector
A) Strengthening union influence B) Removing all HRM policies C) Mandating state arbitration D) Weakening the AIRC
A) National trade disputes B) External corporate mergers C) Allegations of harassment D) International policy disagreements
A) They are always cheaper than litigation B) Parties have an ongoing relationship in a closed system C) They completely ignore hierarchical structures D) They are mandated by the AIRC
A) Involvement of the government B) Hierarchy and job security C) Lack of legal documentation D) External union interference
A) Professional development mediation B) Party-directed mediation C) Policy-directed management D) Peer-driven management
A) Corporate branding disputes B) Government regulatory compliance C) Deep-seated interpersonal conflict D) Salary negotiations
A) Signing a legal contract B) Terminating the employees C) Arbitrating the dispute D) Listening to each party separately
A) Legal advice for both parties B) Financial compensation audits C) Coaching and role plays D) Cross-examination of witnesses
A) Avoiding direct conversation at all costs B) Assigning blame to one specific party C) Forcing a settlement through intimidation D) Learning how to converse directly with an adversary
A) Neutral personnel assessment B) National policy agreement C) Non-partisan appraisal D) Negotiated performance appraisal
A) Removes the need for supervisor feedback B) Replaces all management authority C) Focuses exclusively on financial bonuses D) Preserves hierarchical power while encouraging dialogue
A) The rise of the individual B) Increased government funding for unions C) Mandatory arbitration laws D) The success of the AIRC
A) It is not possible to determine the time difference. B) It takes the exact same amount of time. C) It takes significantly less time. D) It takes significantly more time.
A) They are sent to the attorneys. B) They are published in a public report. C) They are filed with the court. D) They are often destroyed.
A) The high cost of the mediator. B) Threatened criminal acts. C) Disagreements over property value. D) Failure to reach an agreement.
A) The court clerk. B) The judge or jury. C) The mediator. D) The parties involved.
A) No, they are merely suggestions. B) Only if a lawyer signs them. C) Yes, they are fully enforceable. D) Only if the judge was present.
A) An advocate for the party with the strongest case. B) A neutral facilitator. C) A legal advisor for both sides. D) A judge making a final ruling.
A) Reality-testing B) Litigation C) Arbitration D) Judgment
A) Internuncius B) Philantropus C) Conciliator D) Proxenetas
A) The Anglo-Saxon Code B) Justinian's Digest C) The Epistle to the Philippians D) The Singapore Convention
A) Determined by an external authority B) Prohibited for private individuals C) Mandatory by court order in every case D) Typically voluntary
A) Saint Paul B) Justinian C) Epaphroditus D) Augustus
A) The Kushites B) Modern Anglo-Saxon C) Roman D) Ancient Greek
A) Legal prosecution B) Judicial sentencing C) Legislative drafting D) Dispute prevention
A) Business-to-employee (B2E) B) Business-to-investor (B2I) C) Business-to-government (B2G) D) Business-to-public (B2P)
A) Mediation B) Conciliation C) Litigation D) Arbitration
A) Individual bargaining B) A collectivist approach C) Decentralized systems D) Enterprise level resolution
A) With the supreme court B) At the state level only C) At the enterprise level D) With the Commonwealth parliament
A) Union Power amendments B) Conciliation and Arbitration amendments C) Collective Bargaining amendments D) WorkChoices amendments
A) Increased polarization B) Reduced control for disputants C) Higher litigation fees D) Cost saving
A) Increased polarization B) Reduced polarization C) Polarization remains neutral D) It eliminates political parties
A) Trained volunteer mediators B) Government-appointed judges C) Police department negotiators D) Paid litigation attorneys
A) Mid 1980s B) Late 1990s C) Early 1970s D) Early 1950s
A) California B) Florida C) New York D) Texas
A) The Mediation Reform Act 1990 B) The Australian Judicial Code C) Family Law Act 1975 D) The Community Justice Statute
A) Local community boards B) Attorney-General's Department C) Private legal firms D) Supreme Court of Australia
A) Restorative practices B) Legal prosecution C) Punitive measures D) Mandatory arbitration
A) Public prosecution B) Formal litigation C) Judicial sentencing D) Community accountability
A) School Harmony Project B) Student Conflict Resolution Initiative C) Peer Peace Makers D) Peace Pals
A) 10 years B) 1 year C) 5 years D) 6 months
A) 60% B) 20% C) 40% D) 10%
A) A diverse, suburban elementary school B) A rural technical college C) A private boarding school D) An urban high school
A) 825 B) 450 C) 250 D) 1000
A) A bilateral contract B) A binding arbitration award C) A legislative act D) A court order
A) Criminal law B) Family law C) Ship-brokering D) Constitutional law
A) Providing legal advice B) Practicing commerce C) Writing academic papers D) Using public transport
A) Identifying issues B) Facilitating communication C) Offering prescriptive advice D) Managing the interaction
A) The media coverage of the dispute B) The background of the lawyers C) The political affiliation of the parties D) Non-verbal messages
A) Only in civil cases B) Only in criminal cases C) Yes, strictly D) No
A) A legal clerk B) A private mediation client C) A local neighborhood watch D) A board
A) Police officers B) Real estate agents C) Accountants D) Journalists
A) Considered a suggestion rather than a contract B) Void and unenforceable C) The same status as any other agreement D) Legally binding regardless of contract law
A) Politicians B) Private investigators C) Social workers D) Jury consultants
A) Public recognition B) Legal immunity C) Payment D) A promotion
A) United States B) Australia C) Germany D) United Kingdom
A) Approximately 200 hours B) Approximately 800 hours C) Approximately 1000 hours D) Approximately 500 hours
A) 25 hours B) 50 hours C) 100 hours D) 200 hours
A) The Georgetown Code B) AMDRAS C) The Mediate BC Society Code D) The European Commission Standards
A) The local mayor's office B) Professional organizations C) The federal police D) Individual mediators without oversight
A) One B) Three C) Ten D) Five
A) The European Commission B) The Ontario Association of Family Mediators C) The Georgetown Ethics Commission D) Mediate BC Society
A) A government agency B) A non-profit society C) A for-profit corporation D) A private law firm
A) Arbitration. B) Prozessbegleitung (facilitation). C) Litigation. D) Judgment.
A) 1 January 2012. B) 21 June 2016. C) 1 September 2017. D) 1 January 2008.
A) BAFM. B) UN Mediation Council. C) NMAS. D) AMDRAS.
A) The government chooses the mediator randomly. B) The program director generally assigns them. C) The parties involved must select the mediator by lottery. D) The parties are not allowed to use a mediator.
A) The registrar contacts a nominating entity. B) The mediation process is immediately terminated. C) The parties must flip a coin to decide. D) The court assigns a judge to act as a mediator.
A) The local police department. B) The Bar Association. C) The international trade commission. D) The municipal tax office.
A) Formal mechanisms were clearly defined by law. B) Parties could appeal through the Supreme Court. C) The process was managed by an online voting system. D) Formal mechanisms had not been established.
A) Technical coding skills. B) Legal authority. C) Strictness. D) Empathy.
A) The absence of written contracts B) Professional insurance C) Government immunity D) Proper training
A) Quite uncommon B) Extremely frequent C) Standard procedure in all disputes D) Prohibited by international law
A) Intentional malice B) A signed waiver C) Actual causation D) Financial insolvency of the mediator
A) Negligence B) Breach of contract C) Misrepresentation D) Conflict of interest
A) Savills v The Institute B) Tapoohi v Lewenberg C) The UK Mediation Case of 2006 D) The Estate Settlement Dispute
A) Criminal fines B) Punitive C) Compensatory D) Arbitration awards
A) Through a recorded video submission B) By sending a proxy without lawyers C) By mail correspondence D) Via telephone
A) Liability insurance B) Legal protections for confidentiality C) Access to office space D) Professional training
A) Bar association membership B) Court-mandated salary caps C) Liability insurance D) Mandatory arbitration
A) Blended B) Evaluative C) Purely facilitative D) Transformative
A) An attorney present for each side B) Government certification C) Written consent from participants D) A court order
A) The legal outcome B) The trial schedule C) The parties' financial assets D) The process
A) Setting the agenda B) Financial outcomes C) Communication D) Evaluating evidence
A) The problem itself B) The mediator C) The person involved D) The legal system
A) Civil matters B) International treaty negotiations C) Criminal homicide cases D) High-stakes constitutional disputes
A) The decline of the legal profession B) The invention of the internet C) A major change in international law D) The global pandemic
A) Reaching the fastest conclusion B) Neutrality at all costs C) Protecting their party's interest D) Adhering to strict court rules
A) Public record keeping B) Informality C) Rigid structure D) Mandatory legal representation
A) Detailed analysis of the past B) Future goals C) The patterns of childhood beliefs D) The origins of past behaviors
A) Supportiveness B) Neutrality C) Intention to influence D) Advocacy
A) Jury selection B) Binding legal precedents C) Formal court procedures D) Market interships
A) The court B) The arbiter C) A jury D) The parties involved
A) The opposing parties B) The arbitrators C) The courts D) The mediators
A) The mediator B) The judge C) The opposing party D) The court clerk
A) Strict adherence to legal rules B) Non-adversarialism C) Punitive sentencing D) Adjudication by a judge
A) Mandatory jury involvement. B) Reliance on punitive measures. C) Imposed legal settlements. D) Client-directed solutions. |