A) A lane for parking bicycles. B) A lane for scooters. C) A lane for jogging. D) A designated lane on the road for cyclists.
A) A bike rental shop. B) A bike-sharing program. C) A low-traffic street that prioritizes bicycle traffic. D) A type of bike race.
A) Bicycle clothing. B) Bike accessories like helmets and locks. C) The network of facilities that support biking such as paths, lanes, and racks. D) The sound of bike bells.
A) A bike lane separated from the road by physical barriers. B) A circular path for biking practices. C) A track for cycling races. D) A track for motor racing.
A) They are cheaper to build than regular bike lanes. B) They are narrower than regular bike lanes. C) They do not have any traffic signals. D) They physically separate cyclists from motor vehicle traffic.
A) It prevents people from biking. B) It provides secure locations to park bicycles at destinations. C) It increases pollution. D) It encourages speeding on bicycles.
A) To signal for emergency bike repairs. B) To alert pedestrians. C) To communicate between cyclists. D) To give cyclists their own signals at intersections.
A) To provide parking and secure storage for bicycles. B) To repair bicycles. C) To organize bike races. D) To sell bicycles.
A) An area at the front of an intersection designated for cyclists to wait for the light to change. B) A box to store bicycles. C) A competition for bikers. D) A box filled with bike accessories.
A) Montreal, Canada B) New York, USA C) San Francisco, USA D) Ottawa, Canada
A) The Tekenen voor de fiets design manual B) MUTCD C) Sustrans Design Manual D) AASHTO Guide to Bikeway Facilities
A) Bikeway B) Greenway C) Segregated cycling facility D) Shared use path
A) Advisory bike lane B) Cycle track C) Sharrow D) Bike lane
A) Buffered bike lane B) Cycle track C) Contraflow bike lane D) Sharrow
A) Shared use path B) Buffered bike lane C) Bicycle boulevard D) Cycle track
A) Segregated cycling facility B) Shared use path C) Bikeway D) Greenway
A) Multi-use path B) Shared-use footway C) Bikeway D) Segregated cycling facility
A) Bogota B) Copenhagen C) New York City D) Amsterdam
A) 50%+ B) 30% C) 70% D) 20%
A) Road diets have no effect on crash frequencies. B) Crash frequencies increased significantly. C) Crash frequencies were 6% lower after installation. D) They result in a significant increase in crash severity.
A) 13.4 million Danish kroner B) 20 million Danish kroner C) 8 million euros D) 10 million euros
A) Adding more stop signs for cyclists B) Building overpasses only for cars C) Removing bike lanes D) Junction treatment
A) Thameslink B) GWR (Great Western Railway) C) Eurostar D) CrossCountry
A) 28%. B) 50%. C) 75%. D) 10%.
A) Germany B) France C) Netherlands D) Denmark
A) 25% B) 30% C) 44% D) 17%
A) Netherlands B) Germany C) Denmark D) Japan
A) 10% B) 60% C) 20% D) Around 40%
A) 2004 B) 2012 C) 2020 D) 2017
A) A 2021 review B) A 2019 study C) A 2023 EU report D) A case-control study in 2021
A) Limited to city centers only B) Subscription basis C) Only available to residents D) Free use without subscription
A) 100 km B) 50 km C) 120 km D) 84 km
A) Berlin B) Madrid C) Paris D) London
A) Rest areas with seating B) Bike repair shops C) Water fountains D) Service stations with air pumps
A) Rotterdam B) Delft C) Groningen D) Amsterdam
A) Gothenburg B) Stockholm C) Malmo D) Uppsala
A) Netherlands B) Germany C) New Zealand D) United States
A) Cycle tracks B) Advisory Shoulders C) Bike boulevards D) Shared lane markings
A) Albertslund Path B) C99 C) Breda-Etten-Leur Route D) RijnWaalpad
A) France. B) Germany. C) The Netherlands. D) Canada.
A) 17.5 km B) 10 km C) 25 km D) 30 km
A) 50% B) 10% C) 36% D) 25%
A) Copenhagen S-tog B) Eurostar C) Rheinbahn in Düsseldorf D) Munich S-Bahn |