A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Presumption
A) Sur-rebuttal Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Secondary Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law
A) admission B) judicial admission C) judicial confession D) judicial admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) they are extra judicial confession B) they are judicial admission C) they are extrajudicial admission D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are judicial confession
A) dying declaration B) res gestae C) common reputation D) declaration against interest E) res gestae
A) direct evidence B) positive evidence C) corroborative evidence D) corroborative evidence E) cumulative evidence
A) judicial confession B) judicial confession C) extra-judicial admission D) judicial admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners B) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. C) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. D) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively E) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively
A) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged B) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence C) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case D) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case E) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case
A) Presumption Juris et de Jure B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Burden of Proof D) Onus Probandi E) Presumption Juris Tantum
A) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule B) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule C) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule D) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule E) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule
A) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. B) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. C) When he is a Questioned document examiner D) When he is criminology graduate E) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity.
A) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. B) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. C) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged D) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Leading question B) Misleading question C) Leading question D) Answer E) Maliciousquestion
A) All of the above B) Preponderanceofevidence C) Preponderanceofevidence D) None of the above E) Substantial evidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun C) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites D) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime
A) Object Evidence B) Substantial Evidence C) Documentary Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) It was B who died last B) It was B who survived C) It was A who died first D) It was A who survived E) It was A who survived
A) Both died at the same time B) X died a head of W C) W died ahead of X D) X died a head of W E) X died after W
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Prima facie Evidence
A) incompetent B) irrelevant C) voidable D) unacceptable E) incompetent
A) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination B) The defense will conduct the cross-examination C) The defense will conduct the direct examination D) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination E) The defense will conduct the direct examination
A) testimonial evidence B) documentary evidence C) object evidence D) oral evidence E) documentary evidence
A) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence B) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence E) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation
A) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest B) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule C) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication
A) Negative Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Corroborative Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay D) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias E) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation
A) Testimonial Evidence B) Implied Admission C) Express Admission D) Express Admission E) Secondary Evidence
A) hearsay evidence rule B) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule C) marital privilege communication rule D) marital privilege disqualification rule E) marital privilege communication rule
A) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination B) Cross-examination C) Direct examination D) Direct examination
A) Material Evidence B) Material Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Relevant Evidence
A) he declarant survives B) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify C) he declarant survives D) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death E) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death
A) it is a dying declaration B) it is a dying declaration C) It is corroborative evidence D) It is hearsay E) it is circumstantial evidence
A) Estoppel by deed B) Estoppel by lashes C) Estoppel in pais D) None of the above E) Estoppel in pais
A) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case B) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case C) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict D) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped E) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm
A) Competent Evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Object evidence D) Prima Facie Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication B) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule C) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule D) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule E) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court
A) written agreements B) documents C) testimonial D) written agreements E) objects
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Positive Evidence D) Testimonial Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Manner of enforcing criminal law B) Administrative penalties C) Substantive rights of parties D) Civil actions for damages E) Ethical conduct of lawyers
A) Punish the accused immediately B) Protect only the victim C) Prolong the trial process D) Avoid police investigations E) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished
A) Decision of the judge B) Filing of a complaint or information C) Trial commencement D) Arrest of the accused E) Issuance of a subpoena
A) The judge B) The offended party or any peace officer C) The prosecutor D) The accused E) The defense lawyer
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The police investigator D) The accused E) The complainant
A) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense B) The type of evidence presented C) The place of arrest D) The nationality of the accused E) The amount of damages claimed
A) Only when he requests for it B) After conviction C) At all stages of the criminal process D) Only during arraignment E) Only during trial
A) In open court B) In private C) During preliminary investigation D) Only in the prosecutor’s office E) In the police station
A) Decided by the police B) Forbidden in criminal law C) The same as arraignment D) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense E) A negotiation between judge and witness
A) Dismiss the case B) Conduct a searching inquiry C) Issue a warrant D) Refer to mediation E) Immediately convict him
A) The mayor B) The judge C) The complainant D) The prosecutor E) The police chief
A) Punishment B) Fine C) Confession D) Guarantee for appearance in court E) Civil indemnity
A) The accused cannot delay trial B) The prosecution must drop weak cases C) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay D) No postponement is allowed E) Trial must be finished in one day
A) The prosecution presents two witnesses B) The accused is tried twice for the same offense C) The accused appeals his case D) There are two informations filed E) The court changes the charge
A) The jurisdiction of the court B) The guilt of the accused C) The civil damages D) The sufficiency of evidence to file information E) The sentence to be imposed
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The defense D) The accused E) The complainant’s lawyer
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Preponderance of evidence C) Probable cause D) Clear and convincing evidence E) Substantial evidence
A) Appeal B) Execution of judgment C) Filing of complaint D) Conviction E) Issuance of warrant of arrest
A) Only hearsay is excluded B) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible C) Confessions can be forced D) All evidence is admissible E) Character evidence is always allowed
A) Based on what another person told the witness B) Based on the witness’s own knowledge C) Derived from physical evidence D) Always admissible E) From an expert opinion
A) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so B) The accused was previously convicted of another offense C) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused D) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form E) The facts charged do not constitute an offense
A) Dismiss the case B) Immediately impose sentence C) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability D) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea E) Refer the case to the Supreme Court
A) Produce documents or objects for inspection B) Appear in court and testify C) Remain in detention D) Execute a written testimony E) Pay a fine to the court
A) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents B) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity C) Testimonies are better than written evidence D) Secondary evidence may always be admitted E) The court decides which evidence is best
A) By clear and convincing evidence B) Beyond reasonable doubt C) By a preponderance of evidence D) By probable cause E) By credible testimony
A) Audio recordings B) Testimony given by witnesses under oath C) Expert opinion submitted to the court D) Objects used in the commission of the crime E) Written statements or documents
A) The right to appeal B) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel C) The right to bail D) The right to be free from double jeopardy E) The right to speedy disposition of cases
A) Improper venue B) Lack of probable cause C) Double jeopardy D) Rebuttal testimony E) Demurrer to evidence
A) The body of the victim only B) The person of the accused C) The penalty imposed by law D) The confession of the suspect E) The facts proving that a crime has been committed
A) Simplify cross-examination B) Allow secret testimonies C) Avoid written evidence D) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits E) Remove the need for witnesses
A) The decision can still be appealed B) The case is reopened automatically C) The case is transferred to another court D) The decision is void E) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed
A) Filing of the affidavit B) Motion of the complainant C) Finding of probable cause by the judge D) Request of the police officer E) Order of the prosecutor
A) Evidence approved by the court B) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest C) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness D) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure E) Evidence submitted by the defense
A) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint B) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC C) Bail may be posted only by the police D) Bail is a security for the release of an accused E) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case
A) Being tried in two different courts B) Being acquitted and later convicted C) Being tried twice for the same offense D) Being arrested by two police units E) Being convicted twice of different offenses
A) Administrative cases of government employees B) All criminal cases C) Civil cases involving government officials D) Election-related crimes E) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office
A) Libel cases B) Traffic violations C) Estafa cases D) Trespassing cases E) Drug-related cases
A) Proceed with trial B) Dismiss the case C) Suspend the prosecutor D) Appoint a public attorney E) Issue a warrant of arrest
A) Cross-examination of witnesses B) Leading questions by any party C) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness D) Questioning by the defense E) Questioning by the judge
A) Allowed during direct examination B) Allowed during cross-examination C) Prohibited during all examinations D) Used only by expert witnesses E) Required in re-direct examination
A) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness B) Summarize all testimonies C) Present new evidence D) Introduce exhibits E) Support the testimony of one’s own witness
A) Expert Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Competent Evidence E) Circumstantial Evidence
A) documentary evidence rule B) secondary evidence rule C) parol evidence rule D) secondary evidence rule E) testimonial knowledge rule
A) res gestae rule B) testimonial knowledge rule C) dying declaration D) res inter alios acta rule E) res inter alios acta rule
A) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan B) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father E) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown"
A) corroborative evidence B) substantial evidence C) relevant evidence D) material evidence E) material evidence
A) Presumption B) Burden of Evidence C) Burden of proof D) Conclusive presumption E) Presumption
A) it is extrajudicial confession B) it is considered a dying declaration L C) it is considered part of the res gestae D) it is a declaration against interest E) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae
A) real evidence B) cumulative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) demonstrative evidence E) demonstrative evidence
A) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only D) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates
A) stupid B) hearsay C) leading D) leading E) misleading
A) Burden of proof B) presumption C) None of the above D) Burden of evidence E) Burden of evidence
A) The declaration must be written B) B's wound must be fatal C) B'sdeath is indispensable D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) B and A must have argument and has grudges
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of proof C) Burden of proof D) None of the above E) Presumptions
A) The Rules of Summary Procedure B) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure C) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule D) The Rules of Summary Procedure E) The Rule of Court Testimony
A) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court B) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court C) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court D) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court E) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court
A) Conclusive Evidence B) SecondaryEvidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) Real Evidence
A) Primary evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Best evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Conclusive evidence
A) Corroborative B) Admissible C) excluded by law D) best evidence E) excluded by law
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Positive Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence |