A) Presumption B) Burden of proof C) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above D) Presumption
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Sur-rebuttal Evidence C) Secondary Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is hearsay B) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only C) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant
A) judicial confession B) extra-judicial confession C) admission D) judicial admission E) judicial admission
A) they are judicial confession B) they are extrajudicial admission C) they are judicial admission D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are extra judicial confession
A) res gestae B) declaration against interest C) res gestae D) common reputation E) dying declaration
A) corroborative evidence B) cumulative evidence C) positive evidence D) direct evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) judicial admission B) extra-judicial confession C) judicial confession D) extra-judicial admission E) judicial confession
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. C) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners D) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. E) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively
A) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence B) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged E) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case
A) Presumption Juris Tantum B) Onus Probandi C) Presumption Juris et de Jure D) Burden of Proof E) Presumption Juris et de Jure
A) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule B) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule C) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule D) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule E) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule
A) When he is criminology graduate B) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. C) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. D) When he is a Questioned document examiner E) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing.
A) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged B) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. C) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. D) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. E) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature.
A) Leading question B) Leading question C) Misleading question D) Answer E) Maliciousquestion
A) All of the above B) None of the above C) Preponderanceofevidence D) Substantial evidence E) Preponderanceofevidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun D) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime
A) Object Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Substantial Evidence E) Documentary Evidence
A) It was A who died first B) It was A who survived C) It was B who survived D) It was A who survived E) It was B who died last
A) Both died at the same time B) X died a head of W C) W died ahead of X D) X died a head of W E) X died after W
A) Prima facie Evidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Prima facie Evidence
A) incompetent B) voidable C) irrelevant D) unacceptable E) incompetent
A) The defense will conduct the direct examination B) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination C) The defense will conduct the cross-examination D) The defense will conduct the direct examination E) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination
A) object evidence B) testimonial evidence C) documentary evidence D) oral evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication E) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence
A) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae B) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule C) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Corroborative Evidence D) Negative Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay D) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. E) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias
A) Secondary Evidence B) Express Admission C) Testimonial Evidence D) Express Admission E) Implied Admission
A) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule B) hearsay evidence rule C) marital privilege communication rule D) marital privilege communication rule E) marital privilege disqualification rule
A) Cross-examination B) Direct examination C) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination D) Direct examination
A) Material Evidence B) Material Evidence C) Relevant Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify B) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death C) he declarant survives D) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death E) he declarant survives
A) it is circumstantial evidence B) it is a dying declaration C) It is corroborative evidence D) It is hearsay E) it is a dying declaration
A) None of the above B) Estoppel in pais C) Estoppel by deed D) Estoppel in pais E) Estoppel by lashes
A) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm B) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict C) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped D) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case E) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case
A) Object evidence B) Competent Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Prima Facie Evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule B) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication C) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule D) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule E) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court
A) testimonial B) written agreements C) objects D) documents E) written agreements
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Positive Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Cumulative Evidence
A) Ethical conduct of lawyers B) Civil actions for damages C) Manner of enforcing criminal law D) Substantive rights of parties E) Administrative penalties
A) Punish the accused immediately B) Protect only the victim C) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished D) Avoid police investigations E) Prolong the trial process
A) Issuance of a subpoena B) Arrest of the accused C) Filing of a complaint or information D) Trial commencement E) Decision of the judge
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The offended party or any peace officer D) The defense lawyer E) The accused
A) The judge B) The accused C) The complainant D) The police investigator E) The prosecutor
A) The nationality of the accused B) The amount of damages claimed C) The place of arrest D) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense E) The type of evidence presented
A) At all stages of the criminal process B) Only during trial C) Only when he requests for it D) After conviction E) Only during arraignment
A) During preliminary investigation B) In private C) Only in the prosecutor’s office D) In the police station E) In open court
A) A negotiation between judge and witness B) The same as arraignment C) Forbidden in criminal law D) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense E) Decided by the police
A) Immediately convict him B) Conduct a searching inquiry C) Refer to mediation D) Issue a warrant E) Dismiss the case
A) The police chief B) The prosecutor C) The complainant D) The mayor E) The judge
A) Civil indemnity B) Confession C) Fine D) Guarantee for appearance in court E) Punishment
A) No postponement is allowed B) The accused cannot delay trial C) The prosecution must drop weak cases D) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay E) Trial must be finished in one day
A) The prosecution presents two witnesses B) The accused appeals his case C) There are two informations filed D) The accused is tried twice for the same offense E) The court changes the charge
A) The jurisdiction of the court B) The guilt of the accused C) The sufficiency of evidence to file information D) The civil damages E) The sentence to be imposed
A) The complainant’s lawyer B) The accused C) The prosecutor D) The defense E) The judge
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Probable cause C) Substantial evidence D) Preponderance of evidence E) Clear and convincing evidence
A) Execution of judgment B) Conviction C) Issuance of warrant of arrest D) Appeal E) Filing of complaint
A) Only hearsay is excluded B) All evidence is admissible C) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible D) Character evidence is always allowed E) Confessions can be forced
A) From an expert opinion B) Derived from physical evidence C) Based on the witness’s own knowledge D) Based on what another person told the witness E) Always admissible
A) The facts charged do not constitute an offense B) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused C) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form D) The accused was previously convicted of another offense E) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so
A) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability B) Dismiss the case C) Refer the case to the Supreme Court D) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea E) Immediately impose sentence
A) Produce documents or objects for inspection B) Execute a written testimony C) Remain in detention D) Appear in court and testify E) Pay a fine to the court
A) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity B) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents C) Secondary evidence may always be admitted D) The court decides which evidence is best E) Testimonies are better than written evidence
A) By clear and convincing evidence B) By a preponderance of evidence C) By credible testimony D) Beyond reasonable doubt E) By probable cause
A) Audio recordings B) Written statements or documents C) Objects used in the commission of the crime D) Testimony given by witnesses under oath E) Expert opinion submitted to the court
A) The right to speedy disposition of cases B) The right to be free from double jeopardy C) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel D) The right to appeal E) The right to bail
A) Rebuttal testimony B) Demurrer to evidence C) Double jeopardy D) Improper venue E) Lack of probable cause
A) The facts proving that a crime has been committed B) The body of the victim only C) The penalty imposed by law D) The person of the accused E) The confession of the suspect
A) Allow secret testimonies B) Simplify cross-examination C) Remove the need for witnesses D) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits E) Avoid written evidence
A) The case is transferred to another court B) The case is reopened automatically C) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed D) The decision can still be appealed E) The decision is void
A) Filing of the affidavit B) Motion of the complainant C) Request of the police officer D) Finding of probable cause by the judge E) Order of the prosecutor
A) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest B) Evidence submitted by the defense C) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness D) Evidence approved by the court E) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure
A) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint B) Bail may be posted only by the police C) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC D) Bail is a security for the release of an accused E) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case
A) Being tried twice for the same offense B) Being convicted twice of different offenses C) Being acquitted and later convicted D) Being arrested by two police units E) Being tried in two different courts
A) Election-related crimes B) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office C) Administrative cases of government employees D) All criminal cases E) Civil cases involving government officials
A) Estafa cases B) Traffic violations C) Trespassing cases D) Drug-related cases E) Libel cases
A) Issue a warrant of arrest B) Appoint a public attorney C) Dismiss the case D) Suspend the prosecutor E) Proceed with trial
A) Questioning by the judge B) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness C) Cross-examination of witnesses D) Leading questions by any party E) Questioning by the defense
A) Prohibited during all examinations B) Allowed during cross-examination C) Used only by expert witnesses D) Allowed during direct examination E) Required in re-direct examination
A) Introduce exhibits B) Summarize all testimonies C) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness D) Support the testimony of one’s own witness E) Present new evidence
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) secondary evidence rule C) documentary evidence rule D) secondary evidence rule E) parol evidence rule
A) dying declaration B) testimonial knowledge rule C) res inter alios acta rule D) res gestae rule E) res inter alios acta rule
A) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father B) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father C) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father D) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan E) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown"
A) corroborative evidence B) relevant evidence C) material evidence D) substantial evidence E) material evidence
A) Presumption B) Burden of Evidence C) Presumption D) Conclusive presumption E) Burden of proof
A) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae B) it is a declaration against interest C) it is considered a dying declaration L D) it is considered part of the res gestae E) it is extrajudicial confession
A) cumulative evidence B) real evidence C) demonstrative evidence D) corroborative evidence E) demonstrative evidence
A) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates B) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only C) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites
A) misleading B) stupid C) leading D) leading E) hearsay
A) presumption B) Burden of evidence C) None of the above D) Burden of evidence E) Burden of proof
A) B and A must have argument and has grudges B) B'sdeath is indispensable C) B's wound must be fatal D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) The declaration must be written
A) Burden of proof B) None of the above C) Burden of evidence D) Presumptions E) Burden of proof
A) The Rules of Summary Procedure B) The Rule of Court Testimony C) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure D) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule E) The Rules of Summary Procedure
A) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court B) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court C) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court D) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court E) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court
A) SecondaryEvidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) Real Evidence
A) Conclusive evidence B) Primary evidence C) Best evidence D) Conclusive evidence E) Secondary evidence
A) Corroborative B) excluded by law C) best evidence D) Admissible E) excluded by law
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Positive Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Testimonial Evidence |