A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Presumption C) Burden of proof D) Presumption
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Secondary Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Sur-rebuttal Evidence
A) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will object because the testimony is hearsay D) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only E) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant
A) judicial admission B) extra-judicial confession C) judicial confession D) admission E) judicial admission
A) they are judicial admission B) they are judicial confession C) they are extra judicial confession D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are extrajudicial admission
A) res gestae B) dying declaration C) res gestae D) common reputation E) declaration against interest
A) positive evidence B) direct evidence C) corroborative evidence D) cumulative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) extra-judicial confession B) judicial admission C) judicial confession D) extra-judicial admission E) judicial confession
A) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners B) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. C) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. D) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively E) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively
A) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence B) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case E) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged
A) Burden of Proof B) Onus Probandi C) Presumption Juris et de Jure D) Presumption Juris Tantum E) Presumption Juris et de Jure
A) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule B) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule C) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule D) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule E) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule
A) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. B) When he is criminology graduate C) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. D) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. E) When he is a Questioned document examiner
A) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged B) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. C) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. D) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Answer B) Misleading question C) Maliciousquestion D) Leading question E) Leading question
A) Preponderanceofevidence B) None of the above C) All of the above D) Preponderanceofevidence E) Substantial evidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun B) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test C) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites D) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun
A) Documentary Evidence B) Object Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Substantial Evidence
A) It was B who died last B) It was A who survived C) It was B who survived D) It was A who survived E) It was A who died first
A) Both died at the same time B) X died a head of W C) X died a head of W D) W died ahead of X E) X died after W
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Prima facie Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) voidable B) unacceptable C) incompetent D) incompetent E) irrelevant
A) The defense will conduct the cross-examination B) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination C) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination D) The defense will conduct the direct examination E) The defense will conduct the direct examination
A) object evidence B) documentary evidence C) documentary evidence D) testimonial evidence E) oral evidence
A) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence E) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication
A) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication B) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule C) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae
A) Direct Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Corroborative Evidence D) Negative Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. C) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias D) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation E) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay
A) Secondary Evidence B) Express Admission C) Express Admission D) Implied Admission E) Testimonial Evidence
A) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule B) hearsay evidence rule C) marital privilege disqualification rule D) marital privilege communication rule E) marital privilege communication rule
A) Direct examination B) Cross-examination C) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination D) Direct examination
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Material Evidence C) Material Evidence D) Relevant Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) he declarant survives B) he declarant survives C) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify D) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death E) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death
A) it is a dying declaration B) it is circumstantial evidence C) It is hearsay D) it is a dying declaration E) It is corroborative evidence
A) None of the above B) Estoppel in pais C) Estoppel by deed D) Estoppel in pais E) Estoppel by lashes
A) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm B) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case C) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict D) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case E) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Prima Facie Evidence C) Object evidence D) Competent Evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court B) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule C) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule D) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule E) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication
A) testimonial B) documents C) written agreements D) written agreements E) objects
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Cumulative Evidence E) Positive Evidence
A) Substantive rights of parties B) Manner of enforcing criminal law C) Civil actions for damages D) Administrative penalties E) Ethical conduct of lawyers
A) Punish the accused immediately B) Prolong the trial process C) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished D) Protect only the victim E) Avoid police investigations
A) Issuance of a subpoena B) Filing of a complaint or information C) Arrest of the accused D) Trial commencement E) Decision of the judge
A) The accused B) The offended party or any peace officer C) The defense lawyer D) The judge E) The prosecutor
A) The accused B) The police investigator C) The judge D) The prosecutor E) The complainant
A) The nationality of the accused B) The type of evidence presented C) The place of arrest D) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense E) The amount of damages claimed
A) Only when he requests for it B) At all stages of the criminal process C) Only during arraignment D) After conviction E) Only during trial
A) In open court B) During preliminary investigation C) Only in the prosecutor’s office D) In the police station E) In private
A) The same as arraignment B) Decided by the police C) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense D) A negotiation between judge and witness E) Forbidden in criminal law
A) Conduct a searching inquiry B) Dismiss the case C) Immediately convict him D) Refer to mediation E) Issue a warrant
A) The mayor B) The police chief C) The judge D) The complainant E) The prosecutor
A) Guarantee for appearance in court B) Confession C) Civil indemnity D) Punishment E) Fine
A) Trial must be finished in one day B) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay C) The prosecution must drop weak cases D) No postponement is allowed E) The accused cannot delay trial
A) The court changes the charge B) The accused appeals his case C) The prosecution presents two witnesses D) There are two informations filed E) The accused is tried twice for the same offense
A) The sufficiency of evidence to file information B) The sentence to be imposed C) The jurisdiction of the court D) The civil damages E) The guilt of the accused
A) The judge B) The complainant’s lawyer C) The accused D) The defense E) The prosecutor
A) Clear and convincing evidence B) Substantial evidence C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Preponderance of evidence E) Probable cause
A) Issuance of warrant of arrest B) Conviction C) Filing of complaint D) Execution of judgment E) Appeal
A) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible B) Character evidence is always allowed C) All evidence is admissible D) Only hearsay is excluded E) Confessions can be forced
A) Derived from physical evidence B) From an expert opinion C) Based on what another person told the witness D) Always admissible E) Based on the witness’s own knowledge
A) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form B) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so C) The accused was previously convicted of another offense D) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused E) The facts charged do not constitute an offense
A) Refer the case to the Supreme Court B) Dismiss the case C) Immediately impose sentence D) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability E) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea
A) Remain in detention B) Produce documents or objects for inspection C) Execute a written testimony D) Appear in court and testify E) Pay a fine to the court
A) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents B) The court decides which evidence is best C) Secondary evidence may always be admitted D) Testimonies are better than written evidence E) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity
A) By probable cause B) By clear and convincing evidence C) By a preponderance of evidence D) Beyond reasonable doubt E) By credible testimony
A) Audio recordings B) Testimony given by witnesses under oath C) Expert opinion submitted to the court D) Objects used in the commission of the crime E) Written statements or documents
A) The right to speedy disposition of cases B) The right to be free from double jeopardy C) The right to appeal D) The right to bail E) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel
A) Demurrer to evidence B) Improper venue C) Lack of probable cause D) Double jeopardy E) Rebuttal testimony
A) The confession of the suspect B) The body of the victim only C) The penalty imposed by law D) The facts proving that a crime has been committed E) The person of the accused
A) Simplify cross-examination B) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits C) Avoid written evidence D) Allow secret testimonies E) Remove the need for witnesses
A) The case is transferred to another court B) The decision can still be appealed C) The decision is void D) The case is reopened automatically E) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed
A) Motion of the complainant B) Finding of probable cause by the judge C) Order of the prosecutor D) Filing of the affidavit E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence approved by the court B) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure C) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest D) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness E) Evidence submitted by the defense
A) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC B) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case C) Bail may be posted only by the police D) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint E) Bail is a security for the release of an accused
A) Being convicted twice of different offenses B) Being acquitted and later convicted C) Being tried twice for the same offense D) Being arrested by two police units E) Being tried in two different courts
A) Administrative cases of government employees B) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office C) Election-related crimes D) Civil cases involving government officials E) All criminal cases
A) Traffic violations B) Trespassing cases C) Libel cases D) Drug-related cases E) Estafa cases
A) Proceed with trial B) Dismiss the case C) Suspend the prosecutor D) Appoint a public attorney E) Issue a warrant of arrest
A) Cross-examination of witnesses B) Leading questions by any party C) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness D) Questioning by the defense E) Questioning by the judge
A) Prohibited during all examinations B) Required in re-direct examination C) Used only by expert witnesses D) Allowed during direct examination E) Allowed during cross-examination
A) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness B) Introduce exhibits C) Summarize all testimonies D) Support the testimony of one’s own witness E) Present new evidence
A) Expert Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Competent Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) secondary evidence rule B) parol evidence rule C) documentary evidence rule D) secondary evidence rule E) testimonial knowledge rule
A) dying declaration B) res inter alios acta rule C) testimonial knowledge rule D) res gestae rule E) res inter alios acta rule
A) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" B) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father C) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan D) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father E) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father
A) corroborative evidence B) relevant evidence C) material evidence D) material evidence E) substantial evidence
A) Presumption B) Presumption C) Burden of proof D) Burden of Evidence E) Conclusive presumption
A) it is considered part of the res gestae B) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae C) it is extrajudicial confession D) it is considered a dying declaration L E) it is a declaration against interest
A) real evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) cumulative evidence D) corroborative evidence E) demonstrative evidence
A) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only D) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates E) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites
A) stupid B) hearsay C) leading D) leading E) misleading
A) None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Burden of evidence D) presumption E) Burden of evidence
A) B and A must have argument and has grudges B) B'sdeath is indispensable C) The declaration must be written D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) B's wound must be fatal
A) Burden of proof B) Presumptions C) None of the above D) Burden of evidence E) Burden of proof
A) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Rules of Summary Procedure D) The Rule of Court Testimony E) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule
A) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court B) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court C) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court D) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court E) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court
A) Real Evidence B) SecondaryEvidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) Conclusive evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Best evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Primary evidence
A) Corroborative B) best evidence C) excluded by law D) excluded by law E) Admissible
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Testimonial Evidence E) Positive Evidence |