A) Presumption B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Secondary Evidence E) Sur-rebuttal Evidence
A) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law B) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant C) I will object because the testimony is hearsay D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only
A) judicial confession B) judicial admission C) extra-judicial confession D) admission E) judicial admission
A) they are extra judicial confession B) they are judicial admission C) they are judicial confession D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are extrajudicial admission
A) dying declaration B) declaration against interest C) res gestae D) common reputation E) res gestae
A) corroborative evidence B) corroborative evidence C) cumulative evidence D) positive evidence E) direct evidence
A) extra-judicial admission B) judicial admission C) extra-judicial confession D) judicial confession E) judicial confession
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively C) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. D) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners E) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively.
A) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence B) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case E) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case
A) Presumption Juris et de Jure B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Onus Probandi D) Burden of Proof E) Presumption Juris Tantum
A) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule B) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule C) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule D) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule E) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule
A) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. B) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. C) When he is criminology graduate D) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. E) When he is a Questioned document examiner
A) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. B) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. C) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged D) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. E) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay.
A) Answer B) Maliciousquestion C) Leading question D) Misleading question E) Leading question
A) Preponderanceofevidence B) Preponderanceofevidence C) None of the above D) Substantial evidence E) All of the above
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun B) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime D) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun
A) Substantial Evidence B) Object Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Documentary Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) It was A who survived B) It was A who died first C) It was B who survived D) It was A who survived E) It was B who died last
A) W died ahead of X B) X died after W C) Both died at the same time D) X died a head of W E) X died a head of W
A) Prima facie Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Conclusive Evidence
A) incompetent B) irrelevant C) incompetent D) unacceptable E) voidable
A) The defense will conduct the direct examination B) The defense will conduct the direct examination C) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination D) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination E) The defense will conduct the cross-examination
A) oral evidence B) testimonial evidence C) documentary evidence D) object evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation D) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence E) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication
A) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication B) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest C) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Corroborative Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Negative Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. D) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation E) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias
A) Testimonial Evidence B) Express Admission C) Secondary Evidence D) Express Admission E) Implied Admission
A) marital privilege disqualification rule B) marital privilege communication rule C) hearsay evidence rule D) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule E) marital privilege communication rule
A) Cross-examination B) Direct examination C) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination D) Direct examination
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Relevant Evidence C) Material Evidence D) Material Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) he declarant survives B) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death C) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify D) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death E) he declarant survives
A) it is a dying declaration B) It is hearsay C) It is corroborative evidence D) it is circumstantial evidence E) it is a dying declaration
A) Estoppel by deed B) Estoppel in pais C) None of the above D) Estoppel in pais E) Estoppel by lashes
A) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm B) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped C) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case D) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict E) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Prima Facie Evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Object evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule B) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule C) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court D) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication E) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule
A) written agreements B) testimonial C) objects D) documents E) written agreements
A) Testimonial Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Cumulative Evidence D) Positive Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Substantive rights of parties B) Ethical conduct of lawyers C) Manner of enforcing criminal law D) Civil actions for damages E) Administrative penalties
A) Punish the accused immediately B) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished C) Protect only the victim D) Prolong the trial process E) Avoid police investigations
A) Issuance of a subpoena B) Filing of a complaint or information C) Trial commencement D) Decision of the judge E) Arrest of the accused
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The accused D) The defense lawyer E) The offended party or any peace officer
A) The judge B) The police investigator C) The accused D) The complainant E) The prosecutor
A) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense B) The nationality of the accused C) The place of arrest D) The type of evidence presented E) The amount of damages claimed
A) Only during trial B) Only when he requests for it C) At all stages of the criminal process D) Only during arraignment E) After conviction
A) During preliminary investigation B) In open court C) In the police station D) In private E) Only in the prosecutor’s office
A) Forbidden in criminal law B) The same as arraignment C) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense D) A negotiation between judge and witness E) Decided by the police
A) Refer to mediation B) Immediately convict him C) Dismiss the case D) Issue a warrant E) Conduct a searching inquiry
A) The complainant B) The mayor C) The prosecutor D) The police chief E) The judge
A) Fine B) Guarantee for appearance in court C) Civil indemnity D) Confession E) Punishment
A) The accused cannot delay trial B) Trial must be finished in one day C) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay D) No postponement is allowed E) The prosecution must drop weak cases
A) The prosecution presents two witnesses B) There are two informations filed C) The accused appeals his case D) The accused is tried twice for the same offense E) The court changes the charge
A) The guilt of the accused B) The sentence to be imposed C) The sufficiency of evidence to file information D) The civil damages E) The jurisdiction of the court
A) The complainant’s lawyer B) The prosecutor C) The accused D) The defense E) The judge
A) Substantial evidence B) Clear and convincing evidence C) Probable cause D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt E) Preponderance of evidence
A) Appeal B) Conviction C) Execution of judgment D) Issuance of warrant of arrest E) Filing of complaint
A) Character evidence is always allowed B) Only hearsay is excluded C) Confessions can be forced D) All evidence is admissible E) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible
A) Always admissible B) Based on the witness’s own knowledge C) From an expert opinion D) Based on what another person told the witness E) Derived from physical evidence
A) The facts charged do not constitute an offense B) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so C) The accused was previously convicted of another offense D) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form E) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused
A) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea B) Dismiss the case C) Refer the case to the Supreme Court D) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability E) Immediately impose sentence
A) Pay a fine to the court B) Appear in court and testify C) Execute a written testimony D) Remain in detention E) Produce documents or objects for inspection
A) The court decides which evidence is best B) Testimonies are better than written evidence C) Secondary evidence may always be admitted D) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents E) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity
A) By credible testimony B) By clear and convincing evidence C) By a preponderance of evidence D) Beyond reasonable doubt E) By probable cause
A) Audio recordings B) Expert opinion submitted to the court C) Objects used in the commission of the crime D) Written statements or documents E) Testimony given by witnesses under oath
A) The right to bail B) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel C) The right to be free from double jeopardy D) The right to appeal E) The right to speedy disposition of cases
A) Improper venue B) Demurrer to evidence C) Double jeopardy D) Rebuttal testimony E) Lack of probable cause
A) The penalty imposed by law B) The body of the victim only C) The facts proving that a crime has been committed D) The person of the accused E) The confession of the suspect
A) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits B) Remove the need for witnesses C) Allow secret testimonies D) Avoid written evidence E) Simplify cross-examination
A) The case is transferred to another court B) The decision is void C) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed D) The decision can still be appealed E) The case is reopened automatically
A) Order of the prosecutor B) Filing of the affidavit C) Motion of the complainant D) Request of the police officer E) Finding of probable cause by the judge
A) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest B) Evidence submitted by the defense C) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure D) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness E) Evidence approved by the court
A) Bail may be posted only by the police B) Bail is a security for the release of an accused C) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case D) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint E) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC
A) Being acquitted and later convicted B) Being arrested by two police units C) Being tried twice for the same offense D) Being tried in two different courts E) Being convicted twice of different offenses
A) Civil cases involving government officials B) Election-related crimes C) Administrative cases of government employees D) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office E) All criminal cases
A) Trespassing cases B) Drug-related cases C) Libel cases D) Traffic violations E) Estafa cases
A) Dismiss the case B) Suspend the prosecutor C) Proceed with trial D) Issue a warrant of arrest E) Appoint a public attorney
A) Leading questions by any party B) Cross-examination of witnesses C) Questioning by the defense D) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness E) Questioning by the judge
A) Allowed during direct examination B) Required in re-direct examination C) Allowed during cross-examination D) Used only by expert witnesses E) Prohibited during all examinations
A) Summarize all testimonies B) Support the testimony of one’s own witness C) Present new evidence D) Introduce exhibits E) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness
A) Expert Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Circumstantial Evidence
A) secondary evidence rule B) documentary evidence rule C) parol evidence rule D) secondary evidence rule E) testimonial knowledge rule
A) dying declaration B) res inter alios acta rule C) testimonial knowledge rule D) res inter alios acta rule E) res gestae rule
A) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father B) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan C) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" D) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father E) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father
A) substantial evidence B) relevant evidence C) material evidence D) material evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) Presumption B) Conclusive presumption C) Burden of Evidence D) Presumption E) Burden of proof
A) it is considered a dying declaration L B) it is considered part of the res gestae C) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae D) it is a declaration against interest E) it is extrajudicial confession
A) cumulative evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) demonstrative evidence E) real evidence
A) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates B) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only C) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites
A) stupid B) leading C) leading D) misleading E) hearsay
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of evidence C) None of the above D) presumption E) Burden of proof
A) B'sdeath is indispensable B) The declaration must be written C) B and A must have argument and has grudges D) B's wound must be fatal E) B'sdeath is indispensable
A) Presumptions B) Burden of proof C) Burden of proof D) None of the above E) Burden of evidence
A) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Rules of Summary Procedure D) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure E) The Rule of Court Testimony
A) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court B) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court C) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court D) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court E) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court
A) SecondaryEvidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Expert Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Real Evidence
A) Best evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Primary evidence
A) Corroborative B) Admissible C) excluded by law D) excluded by law E) best evidence
A) Positive Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Cumulative Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Testimonial Evidence |