A) 1998 B) 2002 C) 2005 D) 1994
A) Joseph Kruskal B) Thomas Schelling C) L.S. Shapley D) Sergiu Hart
A) Erwin Plein Nemmers Prize in Economics B) Harvey Prize C) Israel Prize D) EMET Prize
A) 1983 B) 2002 C) 1974 D) 1994
A) Harvey Prize B) Nobel Prize C) Yakir Yerushalayim D) Israel Prize
A) 1994 B) 1983 C) 2005 D) 1974
A) Values of Non-Atomic Games B) Lectures on Game Theory C) The Coefficients in an Allocation Problem D) Repeated Games with Incomplete Information
A) The Logic of Backward Induction B) Handbook of Game Theory C) Collected Papers D) Values of Non-Atomic Games
A) The Coefficients in an Allocation Problem B) Repeated Games with Incomplete Information C) Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications D) Values of Non-Atomic Games
A) 2000 B) 1989 C) 1995 D) 1992
A) Acceptable Points in Games of Perfect Information B) Asphericity of alternating knots C) Collected Papers D) The Logic of Backward Induction
A) M. Maschler B) Y. Tauman C) S. Zamir D) I. Arieli
A) Economics B) Political Science C) Physics D) Mathematics
A) US$1.3 million B) US$1.0 million C) US$500,000 D) US$2.0 million
A) Princeton University Press B) MIT Press C) Westview Press D) Elsevier
A) Game Theory and Strategy B) War and Peace C) Rationality and Conflict D) The Future of Israel
A) It should be resolved through pacifism alone B) It should be accepted as inevitable C) It should be ignored D) It should be scientifically studied
A) Emotional responses B) The now over the later C) Short-term gains D) The later over the now
A) Meretz B) Professors for a Strong Israel C) Peace Now D) The Labor Party
A) He was neutral B) He supported it C) He opposed it D) He refused to comment
A) Nash Equilibrium B) Blackmailer Paradox C) Prisoner's Dilemma D) Stag Hunt
A) It was widely celebrated B) It was criticized C) It was praised for his political views D) It was ignored
A) Conservative Jews B) Reform Jews C) Satmar Jews D) Karaite Jews
A) If it remains strictly secular B) If it gives up all disputed land C) If it forms an alliance with Europe D) If it has a religious basis
A) Likud B) Shas C) Ahi D) Kadima
A) Esther Schlesinger B) Esther Aumann C) Batya Cohn D) Sarah Sacks
A) Batya Cohn B) Esther Schlesinger C) Oliver Sacks D) Sarah Aumann
A) Yitzhak Levy B) Shlomo Aumann C) Oliver Sacks D) Effi Eitam
A) 1935 B) 1940 C) 1925 D) 1930
A) Frankfurt am Main, Germany B) Boston, USA C) New York City, USA D) Jerusalem, Israel
A) David Schmeidler B) Lloyd Shapley C) Thomas Schelling D) George Whitehead, Jr.
A) Bayesian rationality B) Correlated equilibrium C) Asphericity D) Common knowledge
A) Talmudic division theory B) Aumann-Shapley value C) Nash equilibrium theorem D) Aumann's agreement theorem
A) George Whitehead, Jr. B) Lloyd Shapley C) David Schmeidler D) Thomas Schelling
A) Schelling B) Whitehead C) Maschler D) Shapley
A) Lloyd Shapley B) George Whitehead, Jr. C) Thomas Schelling D) Sergiu Hart
A) One year B) Two days C) Two weeks D) One month
A) University of California, Berkeley B) Hebrew University of Jerusalem C) Stony Brook University D) Stanford University
A) Sergiu B) David C) Shlomo D) Abraham
A) The Biblical Code Cipher. B) The Sinai Statistical Analysis. C) The Genesis Prediction Study. D) The Great Rabbis Experiment.
A) Science Magazine. B) Nature. C) The New York Times. D) Statistical Science.
A) The Witztum-Rips-Rosenberg paper. B) The Dror Bar-Natan findings. C) A summary of his own personal research. D) A study by H.J. Gans.
A) 1992. B) 1996. C) 1988. D) 2000.
A) H.J. Gans. B) Yoav Rosenberg. C) Eliyahu Rips. D) Doron Witztum.
A) Both tests confirmed the existence of the code. B) Both tests failed to confirm the code. C) One test succeeded and one test failed. D) The committee could not reach a consensus.
A) The results were inconclusive about the existence, but confirmed the non-existence. B) Yes, definitively. C) Only partially. D) No. |