A) A phenomenon where individuals are less likely to offer help in an emergency situation when other people are present. B) A behavior that encourages individuals to intervene in group settings. C) A study that shows people are more likely to help when alone. D) An instinctual response to assist in any emergency situation.
A) 1982. B) 1975. C) 1968. D) 1990.
A) Heightened sense of personal responsibility. B) Strong individualistic values. C) Diffusion of responsibility. D) Rapid decision-making skills.
A) People feel more personal responsibility to respond when others are present. B) People respond more efficiently in groups rather than alone. C) People feel less personal responsibility to respond when others are present. D) People selectively assign responsibility to others in emergency situations.
A) Assessing the risks involved. B) Taking direct action to help. C) Deciding whether to intervene. D) Being aware of an emergency situation.
A) It delays emergency response time. B) It only affects individual response time. C) It has no effect on emergency response time. D) It speeds up emergency response time.
A) Rely on social norms to guide behavior. B) Take personal responsibility and intervene. C) Assume someone else will help and walk away. D) Avoid getting involved in emergency situations.
A) Encouraging people to solely rely on group decision-making. B) Educating individuals about the phenomenon and its consequences. C) Promoting an individualistic attitude in group settings. D) Ignoring the presence of others in emergency situations.
A) Ninety percent B) Seventy percent C) Forty percent D) Fifty percent
A) All types of emergencies B) Dangerous emergencies C) Non-dangerous emergencies D) Non-emergency situations
A) 30% B) Over 90% C) 50% D) 70%
A) Social identity B) Social facilitation C) Social influence D) Social comparison
A) Indirect intervention B) Passive intervention C) Direct intervention D) Detour intervention
A) Non-dangerous situations B) Non-emergency situations C) Dangerous situations D) All situations
A) Low consequence B) Environmental familiarity C) Group cohesiveness D) High ambiguity
A) Increases likelihood B) Causes confusion C) Decreases likelihood D) Has no effect
A) Has no effect B) Increases urgency C) Encourages helping behavior D) May inhibit helping behavior
A) Two member high cohesive group B) Two member low cohesive group C) Four member low cohesive group D) Four member high cohesive group
A) If the person was wearing a neutral shirt B) If the person was wearing a disliked football jersey C) If the person was wearing a liked football jersey D) If the person was wearing a plain shirt
A) Can encourage helping B) Always inhibits helping C) Causes confusion D) Has no effect
A) Social identity theory B) Social comparison theory C) Cognitive dissonance theory D) Self-categorization theory
A) Group size predicted helping B) Social identification predicted helping C) Empathy predicted helping D) Empathy no longer predicted helping
A) 2010 B) 2011 C) 2008 D) 2009
A) What Would You Do? The Series B) The Bystander Effect: Live C) Bystander Intervention: Reality Check D) Primetime: What Would You Do?
A) 500 B) 400 C) 300 D) 100
A) 36.38 seconds B) 45.00 seconds C) 60.00 seconds D) 51.53 seconds
A) 51.53 seconds B) 45.00 seconds C) 60.00 seconds D) 36.38 seconds
A) James Harmen B) John Harmen C) Jake Smith D) Jake Harmen
A) Susan Harmen B) Suzy Harmen C) Sally Harmen D) Suzanne Harmen
A) 2012 B) 2005 C) 2010 D) 2007
A) Acting B) Feeling empathy C) Noticing that something is wrong D) Interpreting a need for help
A) Social status scanning B) Empathic anger C) Pluralistic ignorance D) Moral deliberation
A) Interpreting B) Feeling empathy C) Acting D) Noticing
A) Condensing motives for action B) Feeling empathy C) Noticing that something is wrong D) Interpreting a need for help
A) Peer pressure B) Gender stereotypes C) Compliance with rules D) Fear of punishment
A) Reasonable doubt B) Mitigating factors C) Extenuating circumstances D) Justifiable reasons
A) Cultural isolation B) Individualism C) Collective consciousness D) Personal accountability
A) The Green Dot program B) The Red Flag program C) The Blue Light program D) The InterAct Sexual Assault Prevention program
A) Conformity B) Social facilitation C) Deindividuation D) Group polarization
A) October 24, 2009 B) December 25, 1964 C) May 30, 2011 D) March 13, 1964
A) The police were not called at all B) The story had been exaggerated by the media C) There were more than 38 eyewitnesses D) The attacker was immediately caught
A) Swimming B) Standing neck deep in water C) Sailing D) Fishing
A) Hypothermia B) Dehydration C) Drowning D) Heart attack
A) A firefighter B) A Coast Guard member C) A good samaritan D) A police officer
A) Broken bones B) Loss of hearing C) Scars from cigarette burns on her back D) Amnesia
A) Nearly 40 minutes B) 50 minutes C) 30 minutes D) 20 minutes
A) 15 minutes B) 10 minutes C) 3 minutes D) 5 minutes |