A) A phenomenon where individuals are less likely to offer help in an emergency situation when other people are present. B) An instinctual response to assist in any emergency situation. C) A behavior that encourages individuals to intervene in group settings. D) A study that shows people are more likely to help when alone.
A) 1968. B) 1990. C) 1982. D) 1975.
A) Diffusion of responsibility. B) Heightened sense of personal responsibility. C) Strong individualistic values. D) Rapid decision-making skills.
A) People feel more personal responsibility to respond when others are present. B) People feel less personal responsibility to respond when others are present. C) People selectively assign responsibility to others in emergency situations. D) People respond more efficiently in groups rather than alone.
A) Being aware of an emergency situation. B) Taking direct action to help. C) Assessing the risks involved. D) Deciding whether to intervene.
A) It speeds up emergency response time. B) It has no effect on emergency response time. C) It delays emergency response time. D) It only affects individual response time.
A) Take personal responsibility and intervene. B) Assume someone else will help and walk away. C) Avoid getting involved in emergency situations. D) Rely on social norms to guide behavior.
A) Ignoring the presence of others in emergency situations. B) Educating individuals about the phenomenon and its consequences. C) Encouraging people to solely rely on group decision-making. D) Promoting an individualistic attitude in group settings.
A) Seventy percent B) Forty percent C) Ninety percent D) Fifty percent
A) All types of emergencies B) Non-dangerous emergencies C) Dangerous emergencies D) Non-emergency situations
A) 30% B) 50% C) 70% D) Over 90%
A) Social comparison B) Social facilitation C) Social identity D) Social influence
A) Indirect intervention B) Detour intervention C) Passive intervention D) Direct intervention
A) All situations B) Non-dangerous situations C) Dangerous situations D) Non-emergency situations
A) Low consequence B) Group cohesiveness C) High ambiguity D) Environmental familiarity
A) Has no effect B) Decreases likelihood C) Causes confusion D) Increases likelihood
A) Has no effect B) May inhibit helping behavior C) Encourages helping behavior D) Increases urgency
A) Two member low cohesive group B) Two member high cohesive group C) Four member high cohesive group D) Four member low cohesive group
A) Feeling empathy B) Interpreting a need for help C) Noticing that something is wrong D) Condensing motives for action
A) A Coast Guard member B) A good samaritan C) A police officer D) A firefighter
A) December 25, 1964 B) October 24, 2009 C) May 30, 2011 D) March 13, 1964
A) Conformity B) Social facilitation C) Deindividuation D) Group polarization
A) Suzy Harmen B) Susan Harmen C) Sally Harmen D) Suzanne Harmen
A) 36.38 seconds B) 45.00 seconds C) 51.53 seconds D) 60.00 seconds
A) If the person was wearing a plain shirt B) If the person was wearing a disliked football jersey C) If the person was wearing a liked football jersey D) If the person was wearing a neutral shirt
A) 2011 B) 2010 C) 2009 D) 2008
A) Always inhibits helping B) Has no effect C) Can encourage helping D) Causes confusion
A) The InterAct Sexual Assault Prevention program B) The Green Dot program C) The Blue Light program D) The Red Flag program
A) Jake Smith B) John Harmen C) Jake Harmen D) James Harmen
A) Group size predicted helping B) Social identification predicted helping C) Empathy predicted helping D) Empathy no longer predicted helping
A) Amnesia B) Loss of hearing C) Scars from cigarette burns on her back D) Broken bones
A) Pluralistic ignorance B) Moral deliberation C) Social status scanning D) Empathic anger
A) Swimming B) Fishing C) Standing neck deep in water D) Sailing
A) Fear of punishment B) Compliance with rules C) Gender stereotypes D) Peer pressure
A) Collective consciousness B) Personal accountability C) Individualism D) Cultural isolation
A) The story had been exaggerated by the media B) The attacker was immediately caught C) The police were not called at all D) There were more than 38 eyewitnesses
A) 2012 B) 2005 C) 2010 D) 2007
A) 60.00 seconds B) 45.00 seconds C) 51.53 seconds D) 36.38 seconds
A) 3 minutes B) 15 minutes C) 5 minutes D) 10 minutes
A) Social identity theory B) Social comparison theory C) Self-categorization theory D) Cognitive dissonance theory
A) 20 minutes B) 50 minutes C) 30 minutes D) Nearly 40 minutes
A) Feeling empathy B) Interpreting C) Acting D) Noticing
A) Mitigating factors B) Justifiable reasons C) Reasonable doubt D) Extenuating circumstances
A) Noticing that something is wrong B) Acting C) Feeling empathy D) Interpreting a need for help
A) 100 B) 500 C) 400 D) 300
A) The Bystander Effect: Live B) What Would You Do? The Series C) Bystander Intervention: Reality Check D) Primetime: What Would You Do?
A) Dehydration B) Heart attack C) Drowning D) Hypothermia |