A) An interpretation based on mathematical induction. B) An interpretation used in software engineering. C) An interpretation of a first-order logic formula by assigning concrete values to variables. D) An interpretation that relies on axiomatic systems.
A) To add complexity to a proof in order to make it more convincing. B) To transform a proof into a canonical form for easier analysis. C) To eliminate the need for formal proofs. D) To standardize the notation used in mathematical proofs.
A) The study of the resources required to prove mathematical theorems. B) Determining the truth value of a proposition. C) Measuring the length of a mathematical proof. D) Counting the number of logical connectives in a formula.
A) The theorems eliminate the need for proof complexity. B) The theorems provide new techniques for proof construction. C) The theorems show the limitations of formal proof systems. D) The theorems establish standard axiomatic systems.
A) Gerhard Gentzen. B) Alonzo Church. C) Henri Poincaré. D) Alfred Tarski.
A) IF, THEN, ELSE. B) ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY. C) AND, OR, NOT. D) FOR, WHILE, DO.
A) A type of logical inference. B) A correspondence between proofs and computer programs in intuitionistic logic. C) A historical event in proof theory. D) A rule for constructing mathematical proofs.
A) Every proof containing a cut can be transformed into a cut-free proof. B) The principle that cuts cannot be used in formal logic. C) The rule that cuts are necessary for valid proofs. D) The property that all proofs must eliminate cuts. |