A) Unjust vexation B) Scandal C) Disgrace D) Indignity
A) If the mistress is a virgin B) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling C) If the mistress is a relative D) If the man is legally married
A) Live-in B) Cohabit C) Marriage D) Joint household
A) Oral evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Expert evidence
A) Object evidence B) Material evidence C) Relevant evidence D) Real evidence
A) Unreal evidence B) Inadmissible evidence C) None of these D) Incompetent evidence
A) Undeciphered writings B) Medical science C) All of these D) Forensic science
A) Leading question B) Compound question C) General question D) Misleading question
A) Leading question B) Compound question C) General question D) Misleading question
A) Leading question B) General question C) Misleading question D) Compound question
A) None of these B) Capacity of recollection C) Capacity of observation D) Capacity of communication
A) Use of force or intimidation by the offender B) All of the foregoing C) Sterility of the offender D) Resistance on the part of the victim
A) When it is relevant to the issue B) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court C) When it is competent D) All of the foregoing
A) Judicial confessions B) Judicial admissions C) Judicial notice D) Pleadings
A) Competent evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Secondary evidence B) Competent evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Res Gestae rule B) Parol evidence rule C) Hearsay rule D) Best evidence rule
A) The spouses was legally married B) The wife is a party to the case C) The husband is a party to the case D) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other
A) Private communication B) Privilege communication C) Confidential communication D) Dying declaration
A) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon B) Existence of an attorney client relation C) None of the above D) Communication was made in the course of professional employment
A) A criminal case by one grandparent against another B) All of the foregoing C) A crime against him D) A criminal case by one the parent against the other
A) Plea bargaining B) Stipulation C) Compromise D) Contract
A) All of the foregoing B) Admission by conspirator C) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor D) Admission by agent or privies
A) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself B) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority C) The admission was made during the existence of the agency D) All of the foregoing
A) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry B) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death C) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts D) None of the above
A) Conclusive presumption B) Disputable C) Stoppel D) Presumption
A) A contradictory evidence B) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent. C) None of the above D) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude
A) Judicial notice B) Blotter C) Official record D) Judicial Record
A) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven B) There is more than one circumstance C) All of the foregoing D) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established
A) Non of the foregoing B) Some person is criminally responsible for the act C) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act D) That a certain result has been produced
A) Filial privilege B) Dying declaration C) Privileged conversation D) Parental privilege
A) Evidence against the accused B) Means that the accused is not the owner C) Prima facie evidence of fencing D) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime
A) Cumulative B) Relevant C) Corroborative D) Circumstantial
A) Real B) Corroborative C) Material D) Testimonial
A) Client B) Secretary C) Patient D) Penitent
A) Children B) Homosexuals and lesbians C) Insane persons D) Sick persons
A) Secondary evidence B) Best evidence C) Res gestae D) Real evidence
A) Competency B) Admissibility C) Qualification D) Eligibility
A) Evidence B) Proof C) Motive D) Intent
A) Genuine B) Authentic C) Duplicate D) Original
A) Ante mortern statement B) Dead man statute C) Mi ultimo adios D) Parol evidence
A) They understand the obligation of the oath B) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify C) They have not reached the age of discernment. D) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness
A) Ultimate fact B) Proof beyond reasonable doubt C) Preponderance of evidence D) Substantial evidence
A) Factum probans B) Owes probandi C) Factum probandum D) Res gestae
A) Clerk of court B) Witness C) Defense D) Prosecution
A) Extra-judicial confession B) Confession C) Testimony D) Admission
A) Extra-judicial B) Admission C) Confession D) Judicial confession
A) Dying declaration B) Hearsay C) Testimonial evidence D) Res gestae
A) Inheritance B) Heritage C) Pedigree D) Tradition
A) Owe probandi B) Owes probandi C) Factum probandum D) Factum probans
A) Evidentiary fact B) Ultimate fact C) Preponderance of evidence D) Weight of evidence
A) Weight of evidence B) Best evidence C) Preponderance of evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Corpus delicti B) Real evidence C) Physical evidence D) Autoptic evidence
A) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved B) It must be of judicial recognizance C) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) There is more than one circumstance
A) 1 B) 3 C) None D) 2
A) Conclusion B) Presumption C) Conclusive presumptions D) Disputable presumption
A) Res gestae B) Burden of proff C) Burden of evidence D) Estoppel
A) Burden of proof B) Burden of evidence C) Estoppel D) Res gestae
A) Estoppel B) Misleading C) Leading D) Res gestae
A) Private document B) Official record C) Public document D) Official document
A) Testimony B) Positive identification C) Proof D) Evidence
A) Constitution B) Rules of Court C) Revised Penal Code D) Rules on Criminal Procedure
A) Weight of evidence B) Evidentiary fact C) Ultimate fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Relevant B) Admissible C) Compenent D) Material
A) Direct B) Material C) Competent D) Relevant
A) Material B) competent C) Relevant D) Direct
A) Cumulative B) Corroborative C) Circumstantial D) Real
A) Real B) Cumulative C) Corroborative D) Circumstantial
A) Documentary evidence B) Testimonial evidence C) Admission evidence D) Real evidence
A) Positive B) Circumstantial C) Direct D) Negative
A) Primary B) Best C) Prima facie D) Secondary
A) Primary B) Expert C) Best D) Secondary
A) Primary B) Real C) Best D) Conclusive
A) Sec 12 Bill of Rights B) Sec 3 Bill of Rights C) Sec 17 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Admission B) Judicial knowledge C) Judicial Notice D) Cognizance
A) Res gestae B) Misleading C) Leading D) Confusing
A) Negative evidence B) Material evidence C) Positive evidence D) Relevant evidence
A) Plea to dismiss B) Motion to dismiss C) Motion to postpone D) Motion to inhibit
A) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved B) There is more than one circumstance C) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) All of these
A) Some person is criminally liable for the act. B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the C) The accused must be the doer of the act D) That a certain result has been produced.
A) Both B and C B) Testimony of the one who made the writing C) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. D) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer
A) Private Document B) Genuine document C) Public Document D) Holographic document
A) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. B) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. C) A questioned document examiner. D) Any of the foregoing.
A) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. B) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. C) Any of the foregoing D) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings.
A) Before testimony of the witness B) After testimony C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) After the oath of taken by the witness
A) After the direct examination of the witness. B) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. C) During the cross examination D) After the testimony of the witness
A) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena B) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. C) Prompt the court to accept it. D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) Before it has been offered in evidence B) d. None of these C) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. D) After it has been offered in evidence d wit
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Weight of evidence C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Sufficiency of evidence
A) During pre-trial B) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants C) After pre trial D) After a party's testimonial evidence
A) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. B) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. C) By contradictory evidence D) When they relate to preliminary matters.
A) A child of tender age B) A feeble minded person C) A registered voter D) A deaf-mute person
A) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. B) Any of the foregoing. C) In case of a hostile witness. D) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party.
A) In case of a hostile witness B) By contradictory evidence C) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony. D) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad.
A) Deposition B) Testimonial evidence C) Extra judicial statements D) Oral testimony
A) Of legal age B) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based C) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case D) Extensive Training and Education
A) There must be a startling occurrence B) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. C) The statement must be spontaneous. D) It must exist previous to the controversy
A) Capacity of communication B) Capacity of observation C) Capacity of knowledge D) Capacity of recollection
A) Genuine document B) Questioned document C) Authentic document D) Holographic document
A) Alterations B) Collusion between in parties C) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd D) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer |