A) Scandal B) Disgrace C) Indignity D) Unjust vexation
A) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling B) If the mistress is a virgin C) If the mistress is a relative D) If the man is legally married
A) Cohabit B) Joint household C) Live-in D) Marriage
A) Oral evidence B) Testimonial evidence C) Expert evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Object evidence B) Relevant evidence C) Material evidence D) Real evidence
A) Inadmissible evidence B) Unreal evidence C) Incompetent evidence D) None of these
A) Undeciphered writings B) All of these C) Forensic science D) Medical science
A) Misleading question B) Leading question C) General question D) Compound question
A) Leading question B) Compound question C) General question D) Misleading question
A) General question B) Compound question C) Leading question D) Misleading question
A) Capacity of observation B) Capacity of communication C) None of these D) Capacity of recollection
A) Sterility of the offender B) Resistance on the part of the victim C) Use of force or intimidation by the offender D) All of the foregoing
A) When it is competent B) When it is relevant to the issue C) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court D) All of the foregoing
A) Judicial notice B) Judicial admissions C) Pleadings D) Judicial confessions
A) Secondary evidence B) Competent evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Competent evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Primary or best evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Parol evidence rule B) Best evidence rule C) Res Gestae rule D) Hearsay rule
A) The spouses was legally married B) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other C) The wife is a party to the case D) The husband is a party to the case
A) Privilege communication B) Private communication C) Confidential communication D) Dying declaration
A) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon B) Communication was made in the course of professional employment C) Existence of an attorney client relation D) None of the above
A) All of the foregoing B) A criminal case by one grandparent against another C) A crime against him D) A criminal case by one the parent against the other
A) Compromise B) Contract C) Plea bargaining D) Stipulation
A) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor B) Admission by conspirator C) All of the foregoing D) Admission by agent or privies
A) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority B) The admission was made during the existence of the agency C) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself D) All of the foregoing
A) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts B) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) None of the above
A) Presumption B) Conclusive presumption C) Disputable D) Stoppel
A) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent. B) None of the above C) A contradictory evidence D) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude
A) Blotter B) Official record C) Judicial notice D) Judicial Record
A) There is more than one circumstance B) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven C) All of the foregoing D) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established
A) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act B) Non of the foregoing C) That a certain result has been produced D) Some person is criminally responsible for the act
A) Privileged conversation B) Parental privilege C) Filial privilege D) Dying declaration
A) Evidence against the accused B) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime C) Means that the accused is not the owner D) Prima facie evidence of fencing
A) Circumstantial B) Relevant C) Corroborative D) Cumulative
A) Corroborative B) Real C) Testimonial D) Material
A) Penitent B) Client C) Patient D) Secretary
A) Homosexuals and lesbians B) Sick persons C) Insane persons D) Children
A) Real evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Best evidence D) Res gestae
A) Eligibility B) Admissibility C) Competency D) Qualification
A) Proof B) Intent C) Evidence D) Motive
A) Original B) Duplicate C) Genuine D) Authentic
A) Dead man statute B) Mi ultimo adios C) Parol evidence D) Ante mortern statement
A) They have not reached the age of discernment. B) They understand the obligation of the oath C) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify D) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Ultimate fact C) Substantial evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Factum probandum B) Res gestae C) Owes probandi D) Factum probans
A) Defense B) Witness C) Prosecution D) Clerk of court
A) Confession B) Testimony C) Admission D) Extra-judicial confession
A) Extra-judicial B) Judicial confession C) Confession D) Admission
A) Dying declaration B) Hearsay C) Res gestae D) Testimonial evidence
A) Inheritance B) Heritage C) Tradition D) Pedigree
A) Owes probandi B) Factum probans C) Owe probandi D) Factum probandum
A) Ultimate fact B) Evidentiary fact C) Weight of evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Secondary evidence B) Best evidence C) Weight of evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Physical evidence B) Corpus delicti C) Real evidence D) Autoptic evidence
A) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) It must be of judicial recognizance C) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved D) There is more than one circumstance
A) 2 B) 1 C) None D) 3
A) Disputable presumption B) Presumption C) Conclusive presumptions D) Conclusion
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of proff C) Estoppel D) Res gestae
A) Burden of evidence B) Estoppel C) Burden of proof D) Res gestae
A) Leading B) Res gestae C) Estoppel D) Misleading
A) Official record B) Private document C) Public document D) Official document
A) Proof B) Positive identification C) Evidence D) Testimony
A) Rules on Criminal Procedure B) Rules of Court C) Constitution D) Revised Penal Code
A) Weight of evidence B) Evidentiary fact C) Ultimate fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Admissible B) Compenent C) Material D) Relevant
A) Relevant B) Material C) Competent D) Direct
A) Direct B) competent C) Material D) Relevant
A) Corroborative B) Circumstantial C) Cumulative D) Real
A) Cumulative B) Real C) Corroborative D) Circumstantial
A) Testimonial evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Admission evidence D) Real evidence
A) Circumstantial B) Negative C) Direct D) Positive
A) Prima facie B) Best C) Secondary D) Primary
A) Primary B) Expert C) Secondary D) Best
A) Conclusive B) Best C) Real D) Primary
A) Sec 12 Bill of Rights B) Sec 3 Bill of Rights C) Sec 17 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Notice B) Judicial knowledge C) Cognizance D) Judicial Admission
A) Misleading B) Leading C) Res gestae D) Confusing
A) Material evidence B) Positive evidence C) Negative evidence D) Relevant evidence
A) Motion to inhibit B) Motion to dismiss C) Motion to postpone D) Plea to dismiss
A) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved C) There is more than one circumstance D) All of these
A) The accused must be the doer of the act B) That a certain result has been produced. C) Some person is criminally liable for the act. D) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the
A) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer B) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. C) Testimony of the one who made the writing D) Both B and C
A) Private Document B) Genuine document C) Public Document D) Holographic document
A) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. B) Any of the foregoing. C) A questioned document examiner. D) Secretary of the accused for 20 years.
A) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. B) Any of the foregoing C) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. D) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings.
A) After testimony B) After the oath of taken by the witness C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) Before testimony of the witness
A) During the cross examination B) After the testimony of the witness C) After the direct examination of the witness. D) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent.
A) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record B) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. C) Prompt the court to accept it. D) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena
A) After it has been offered in evidence d wit B) d. None of these C) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. D) Before it has been offered in evidence
A) Weight of evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Sufficiency of evidence
A) After a party's testimonial evidence B) During pre-trial C) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants D) After pre trial
A) When they relate to preliminary matters. B) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. C) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. D) By contradictory evidence
A) A feeble minded person B) A registered voter C) A deaf-mute person D) A child of tender age
A) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. B) In case of a hostile witness. C) Any of the foregoing. D) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party.
A) In case of a hostile witness B) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony. C) By contradictory evidence D) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad.
A) Deposition B) Testimonial evidence C) Oral testimony D) Extra judicial statements
A) Of legal age B) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case C) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based D) Extensive Training and Education
A) The statement must be spontaneous. B) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. C) There must be a startling occurrence D) It must exist previous to the controversy
A) Capacity of recollection B) Capacity of communication C) Capacity of knowledge D) Capacity of observation
A) Questioned document B) Authentic document C) Holographic document D) Genuine document
A) Collusion between in parties B) Alterations C) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer D) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd |