A) Scandal B) Disgrace C) Indignity D) Unjust vexation
A) If the mistress is a virgin B) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling C) If the man is legally married D) If the mistress is a relative
A) Joint household B) Cohabit C) Live-in D) Marriage
A) Expert evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Oral evidence
A) Relevant evidence B) Object evidence C) Real evidence D) Material evidence
A) Inadmissible evidence B) None of these C) Incompetent evidence D) Unreal evidence
A) Forensic science B) Medical science C) All of these D) Undeciphered writings
A) Compound question B) General question C) Leading question D) Misleading question
A) Compound question B) Misleading question C) General question D) Leading question
A) General question B) Misleading question C) Compound question D) Leading question
A) Capacity of recollection B) Capacity of communication C) Capacity of observation D) None of these
A) Sterility of the offender B) All of the foregoing C) Use of force or intimidation by the offender D) Resistance on the part of the victim
A) All of the foregoing B) When it is competent C) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court D) When it is relevant to the issue
A) Pleadings B) Judicial admissions C) Judicial confessions D) Judicial notice
A) Conclusive evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Competent evidence D) Primary or best evidence
A) Primary or best evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Competent evidence D) Conclusive evidence
A) Res Gestae rule B) Parol evidence rule C) Hearsay rule D) Best evidence rule
A) The husband is a party to the case B) The spouses was legally married C) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other D) The wife is a party to the case
A) Privilege communication B) Confidential communication C) Dying declaration D) Private communication
A) Existence of an attorney client relation B) Communication was made in the course of professional employment C) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon D) None of the above
A) A criminal case by one grandparent against another B) A crime against him C) A criminal case by one the parent against the other D) All of the foregoing
A) Contract B) Stipulation C) Plea bargaining D) Compromise
A) All of the foregoing B) Admission by agent or privies C) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor D) Admission by conspirator
A) All of the foregoing B) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority C) The admission was made during the existence of the agency D) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself
A) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts B) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) None of the above
A) Stoppel B) Conclusive presumption C) Disputable D) Presumption
A) A contradictory evidence B) None of the above C) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent. D) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude
A) Judicial Record B) Official record C) Judicial notice D) Blotter
A) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven B) There is more than one circumstance C) All of the foregoing D) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established
A) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act B) That a certain result has been produced C) Non of the foregoing D) Some person is criminally responsible for the act
A) Dying declaration B) Privileged conversation C) Filial privilege D) Parental privilege
A) Evidence against the accused B) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime C) Means that the accused is not the owner D) Prima facie evidence of fencing
A) Cumulative B) Corroborative C) Relevant D) Circumstantial
A) Testimonial B) Material C) Real D) Corroborative
A) Client B) Patient C) Secretary D) Penitent
A) Homosexuals and lesbians B) Children C) Insane persons D) Sick persons
A) Best evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Real evidence D) Res gestae
A) Qualification B) Admissibility C) Eligibility D) Competency
A) Proof B) Motive C) Intent D) Evidence
A) Duplicate B) Original C) Authentic D) Genuine
A) Dead man statute B) Parol evidence C) Ante mortern statement D) Mi ultimo adios
A) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify B) They understand the obligation of the oath C) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness D) They have not reached the age of discernment.
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Proof beyond reasonable doubt C) Ultimate fact D) Substantial evidence
A) Factum probans B) Owes probandi C) Res gestae D) Factum probandum
A) Prosecution B) Defense C) Clerk of court D) Witness
A) Admission B) Confession C) Testimony D) Extra-judicial confession
A) Judicial confession B) Confession C) Admission D) Extra-judicial
A) Hearsay B) Res gestae C) Testimonial evidence D) Dying declaration
A) Tradition B) Heritage C) Pedigree D) Inheritance
A) Owe probandi B) Factum probandum C) Owes probandi D) Factum probans
A) Evidentiary fact B) Weight of evidence C) Ultimate fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Weight of evidence C) Best evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Real evidence B) Physical evidence C) Corpus delicti D) Autoptic evidence
A) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved B) It must be of judicial recognizance C) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) There is more than one circumstance
A) 1 B) 2 C) None D) 3
A) Conclusion B) Presumption C) Disputable presumption D) Conclusive presumptions
A) Estoppel B) Burden of evidence C) Burden of proff D) Res gestae
A) Estoppel B) Burden of proof C) Burden of evidence D) Res gestae
A) Misleading B) Estoppel C) Res gestae D) Leading
A) Private document B) Public document C) Official record D) Official document
A) Proof B) Evidence C) Testimony D) Positive identification
A) Rules of Court B) Rules on Criminal Procedure C) Revised Penal Code D) Constitution
A) Ultimate fact B) Evidentiary fact C) Weight of evidence D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Relevant B) Compenent C) Material D) Admissible
A) Material B) Competent C) Direct D) Relevant
A) Relevant B) Direct C) Material D) competent
A) Real B) Cumulative C) Corroborative D) Circumstantial
A) Circumstantial B) Corroborative C) Cumulative D) Real
A) Documentary evidence B) Real evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Admission evidence
A) Positive B) Circumstantial C) Direct D) Negative
A) Best B) Prima facie C) Secondary D) Primary
A) Primary B) Best C) Expert D) Secondary
A) Real B) Best C) Conclusive D) Primary
A) Sec 3 Bill of Rights B) Sec 17 Bill of Rights C) Sec 12 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Notice B) Judicial knowledge C) Judicial Admission D) Cognizance
A) Confusing B) Misleading C) Leading D) Res gestae
A) Negative evidence B) Material evidence C) Positive evidence D) Relevant evidence
A) Motion to postpone B) Motion to dismiss C) Plea to dismiss D) Motion to inhibit
A) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved B) There is more than one circumstance C) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. D) All of these
A) Some person is criminally liable for the act. B) The accused must be the doer of the act C) That a certain result has been produced. D) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the
A) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer B) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. C) Both B and C D) Testimony of the one who made the writing
A) Genuine document B) Private Document C) Public Document D) Holographic document
A) Any of the foregoing. B) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. C) Secretary of the accused for 20 years. D) A questioned document examiner.
A) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings. B) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. C) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. D) Any of the foregoing
A) After testimony B) Before testimony of the witness C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) After the oath of taken by the witness
A) During the cross examination B) After the direct examination of the witness. C) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent. D) After the testimony of the witness
A) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. B) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena C) Prompt the court to accept it. D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court. B) d. None of these C) Before it has been offered in evidence D) After it has been offered in evidence d wit
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Weight of evidence C) Sufficiency of evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
A) During pre-trial B) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants C) After pre trial D) After a party's testimonial evidence
A) By contradictory evidence B) When they relate to preliminary matters. C) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. D) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness.
A) A feeble minded person B) A deaf-mute person C) A registered voter D) A child of tender age
A) In case of a hostile witness. B) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party. C) Any of the foregoing. D) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent.
A) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. B) By contradictory evidence C) In case of a hostile witness D) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony.
A) Extra judicial statements B) Oral testimony C) Deposition D) Testimonial evidence
A) Of legal age B) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case C) Extensive Training and Education D) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based
A) It must exist previous to the controversy B) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. C) The statement must be spontaneous. D) There must be a startling occurrence
A) Capacity of communication B) Capacity of observation C) Capacity of knowledge D) Capacity of recollection
A) Authentic document B) Questioned document C) Genuine document D) Holographic document
A) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd B) Collusion between in parties C) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer D) Alterations |