A) C) To write a personal opinion about the article B) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses C) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses D) A) To summarize the article E) D) To translate the article into simpler language
A) B) Analyzing the author's argument B) C) Rewriting the article C) C) Rewriting the article D) A) Summarizing the article E) D) Discussing the article's relevance to the field
A) B) The structure and organization of the article B) C) The number of references C) B) The structure and organization of the article D) A) The length of the article E) D) The author’s credentials
A) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant? B) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant? C) A) Is the author famous? D) D) How long is the article? E) B) Does the article include personal anecdotes?
A) B) Lack of peer review B) A) Clear introduction C) B) Lack of peer review D) C) Excessive use of charts and graphs E) D) Ambiguous conclusion
A) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow B) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow C) A) The article lacks structure D) D) The article is overly complex E) C) The introduction is lengthy
A) C) A critique doesn’t discuss strengths B) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it C) D) A critique only includes the author's opinion D) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it E) B) A critique is shorter than a summary
A) D) All of the above B) C) Noting whether the article is too long C) D) All of the above D) A) Identifying spelling and grammar errors E) B) Discussing whether the writing is engaging and clear
A) D) The number of sources in the conclusion B) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions C) C) The length of the conclusion D) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions E) B) If the conclusion agrees with the introduction
A) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives B) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives C) D) They are irrelevant and unnecessary in a critique D) B) They help strengthen the article’s main argument E) A) They should always be ignored |