A) D) To translate the article into simpler language B) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses C) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses D) A) To summarize the article E) C) To write a personal opinion about the article
A) D) Discussing the article's relevance to the field B) C) Rewriting the article C) B) Analyzing the author's argument D) C) Rewriting the article E) A) Summarizing the article
A) B) The structure and organization of the article B) C) The number of references C) A) The length of the article D) B) The structure and organization of the article E) D) The author’s credentials
A) D) How long is the article? B) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant? C) B) Does the article include personal anecdotes? D) A) Is the author famous? E) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant?
A) D) Ambiguous conclusion B) B) Lack of peer review C) C) Excessive use of charts and graphs D) A) Clear introduction E) B) Lack of peer review
A) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow B) C) The introduction is lengthy C) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow D) A) The article lacks structure E) D) The article is overly complex
A) C) A critique doesn’t discuss strengths B) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it C) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it D) D) A critique only includes the author's opinion E) B) A critique is shorter than a summary
A) A) Identifying spelling and grammar errors B) B) Discussing whether the writing is engaging and clear C) D) All of the above D) C) Noting whether the article is too long E) D) All of the above
A) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions B) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions C) C) The length of the conclusion D) B) If the conclusion agrees with the introduction E) D) The number of sources in the conclusion
A) D) They are irrelevant and unnecessary in a critique B) B) They help strengthen the article’s main argument C) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives D) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives E) A) They should always be ignored |