A) Act No. 3815 B) C.A. 3815 C) P.D. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) The Revised Penal Code C) Acts D) Presidential Decrees
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) Com. Act No. D) P.D. No.
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) R.A. No. D) Law No.
A) Police power B) State power C) Power of eminent domain D) Power of expropriation
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Batas Blg. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1933 D) Jan. 1, 1931
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) It means that the law be just. B) None of these. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Positivist theory B) Classical theory C) Tradition theory D) Empirical theory
A) None of these. B) A temporary stay C) A fixed stay. D) An occasional stay
A) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. B) Cover up for a crime. C) None of these. D) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime.
A) Due process B) Bill of attainder C) Equal protection D) General application of laws
A) Jurisdctional B) Territorial C) Traditional D) Juristic
A) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment to spite someone. D) Punishment for someone being hated.
A) Consultants B) Envoys C) Consuls D) Ambassadors
A) Positivist theory B) Empirical theory C) Classical theory D) Traditional theory
A) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). B) None of these. C) Expand the law or congressional act. D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) British rule B) English rule C) American rule D) French rule
A) Felony B) Imprudence C) Negligence D) Clumsiness
A) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. B) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) All of these are correct. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) British rule B) American rule C) Frech rule D) English rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Probable felonies C) Mala in se D) Culpable felonies
A) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. B) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. C) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. D) Yes, because criminal law is territorial.
A) American rule B) European rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of intelligence C) Lack of freedom D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the criminal mind of the person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the criminal tendency of a person. D) By the prior acts of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. B) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. C) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. D) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind.
A) Mala prohibita B) Mala in se C) Special crime D) Heinous crime
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) The act of a man defines him. B) A man is defined by his vert acts. C) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. D) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts.
A) Praeter intentionem B) Violent strike C) None of these. D) Excess of force
A) Lack of foresight. B) Clumsiness C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) None of these. B) Such defense is illegal. C) Such defense will not exonerate X. D) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) Murder because the intended victim was A. B) None of these. C) Parricide because the victim was his own father. D) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances.
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Omission D) Culpa
A) Motive B) Mens rea C) Intent D) Proximate cause
A) Motive B) Intent C) Bias D) Prejudice
A) None of these. B) Mistake in the aim C) Mistake in the blow D) Mistake victim
A) Judicial B) Executive C) Political D) Legislative
A) All of these. B) Intent C) Intelligence D) Freedom
A) Fraud B) Intent C) Act D) Omission |