A) Act No. 3815 B) C.A. 3815 C) R.A. 3815 D) P.D. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) The Revised Penal Code C) Acts D) Presidential Decrees
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Com. Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Law No. D) Act No.
A) Power of eminent domain B) State power C) Power of expropriation D) Police power
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Batas Blg. D) Act No.
A) Jan. 1, 1933 B) Jan. 1, 1932 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1930
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) It means that laws be lenient. B) None of these. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that the law be just.
A) Classical theory B) Empirical theory C) Positivist theory D) Tradition theory
A) A fixed stay. B) None of these. C) An occasional stay D) A temporary stay
A) None of these. B) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. C) Cover up for a crime. D) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime.
A) General application of laws B) Bill of attainder C) Due process D) Equal protection
A) Traditional B) Territorial C) Jurisdctional D) Juristic
A) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Consuls B) Consultants C) Ambassadors D) Envoys
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Traditional theory D) Empirical theory
A) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). B) Expand the law or congressional act. C) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. D) None of these.
A) English rule B) American rule C) British rule D) French rule
A) Negligence B) Imprudence C) Felony D) Clumsiness
A) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions were negligent. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. D) All of these are correct.
A) Frech rule B) English rule C) American rule D) British rule
A) Culpable felonies B) Mala prohibita C) Probable felonies D) Mala in se
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. C) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) American rule B) European rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of criminal intent C) Lack of freedom D) Lack of intelligence
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the criminal mind of the person. C) By the overt acts of a person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. B) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. C) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Heinous crime B) Mala prohibita C) Mala in se D) Special crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. B) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. C) The act of a man defines him. D) A man is defined by his vert acts.
A) Excess of force B) Violent strike C) None of these. D) Praeter intentionem
A) Lack of foresight. B) Negligence C) Imprudence D) Clumsiness
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense will not exonerate X. C) Such defense is illegal. D) None of these.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) None of these. C) Parricide because the victim was his own father. D) Murder because the intended victim was A.
A) Negligence B) Culpa C) Imprudence D) Omission
A) Motive B) Proximate cause C) Intent D) Mens rea
A) Bias B) Prejudice C) Motive D) Intent
A) Mistake in the aim B) Mistake in the blow C) Mistake victim D) None of these.
A) Legislative B) Political C) Executive D) Judicial
A) Intelligence B) All of these. C) Intent D) Freedom
A) Fraud B) Intent C) Omission D) Act |