A) Act No. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) P.D. 3815 D) C.A. 3815
A) Acts B) Presidential Decrees C) The Revised Penal Code D) Republic Acts
A) P.D. No. B) Act No. C) Com. Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Law No.
A) Power of expropriation B) Power of eminent domain C) State power D) Police power
A) Batas Blg. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1931 B) Jan. 1, 1933 C) Jan. 1, 1932 D) Jan. 1, 1930
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. B) None of these. C) It means that laws be lenient. D) It means that the law be just.
A) Classical theory B) Tradition theory C) Positivist theory D) Empirical theory
A) An occasional stay B) A fixed stay. C) None of these. D) A temporary stay
A) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. B) Cover up for a crime. C) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. D) None of these.
A) General application of laws B) Bill of attainder C) Due process D) Equal protection
A) Territorial B) Traditional C) Juristic D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. B) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. C) Punishment to spite someone. D) Punishment for someone being hated.
A) Ambassadors B) Envoys C) Consuls D) Consultants
A) Empirical theory B) Classical theory C) Traditional theory D) Positivist theory
A) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). B) None of these. C) Expand the law or congressional act. D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) English rule B) American rule C) British rule D) French rule
A) Felony B) Clumsiness C) Negligence D) Imprudence
A) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. B) All of these are correct. C) No, because X and his companions were negligent. D) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock.
A) British rule B) Frech rule C) English rule D) American rule
A) Mala in se B) Mala prohibita C) Culpable felonies D) Probable felonies
A) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. B) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. C) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) English rule B) British rule C) American rule D) European rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of freedom C) Lack of intelligence D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the criminal tendency of a person. B) By the prior acts of a person. C) By the overt acts of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. B) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. C) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Heinous crime B) Mala in se C) Special crime D) Mala prohibita
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) A man is defined by his vert acts. B) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) The act of a man defines him.
A) None of these. B) Violent strike C) Excess of force D) Praeter intentionem
A) Lack of foresight. B) Imprudence C) Clumsiness D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense will not exonerate X. C) Such defense is illegal. D) None of these.
A) Murder because the intended victim was A. B) Parricide because the victim was his own father. C) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. D) None of these.
A) Culpa B) Negligence C) Imprudence D) Omission
A) Motive B) Intent C) Proximate cause D) Mens rea
A) Motive B) Prejudice C) Bias D) Intent
A) Mistake in the blow B) Mistake in the aim C) None of these. D) Mistake victim
A) Judicial B) Executive C) Legislative D) Political
A) Intelligence B) All of these. C) Intent D) Freedom
A) Intent B) Fraud C) Omission D) Act |