A) P.D. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) Act No. 3815 D) C.A. 3815
A) Presidential Decrees B) Acts C) Republic Acts D) The Revised Penal Code
A) P.D. No. B) Com. Act No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No. C) Act No. D) Law No.
A) Police power B) Power of expropriation C) Power of eminent domain D) State power
A) Batas Blg. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1933 C) Jan. 1, 1930 D) Jan. 1, 1931
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. B) It means that the law be just. C) None of these. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Positivist theory B) Empirical theory C) Classical theory D) Tradition theory
A) None of these. B) An occasional stay C) A temporary stay D) A fixed stay.
A) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. B) Cover up for a crime. C) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. D) None of these.
A) Bill of attainder B) General application of laws C) Due process D) Equal protection
A) Territorial B) Juristic C) Traditional D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment to spite someone. B) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages.
A) Envoys B) Consultants C) Ambassadors D) Consuls
A) Empirical theory B) Traditional theory C) Classical theory D) Positivist theory
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) None of these. D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) American rule B) English rule C) British rule D) French rule
A) Imprudence B) Felony C) Negligence D) Clumsiness
A) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. C) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) No, because X and his companions were negligent. C) All of these are correct. D) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target.
A) American rule B) Frech rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) Probable felonies B) Mala in se C) Culpable felonies D) Mala prohibita
A) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. B) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. C) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. D) Yes, because criminal law is territorial.
A) European rule B) British rule C) English rule D) American rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Lack of freedom B) Lack of intelligence C) Lack of criminal intent D) Mistake of fact
A) By the overt acts of a person. B) By the criminal tendency of a person. C) By the prior acts of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. B) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Special crime B) Mala prohibita C) Mala in se D) Heinous crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. B) The act of a man defines him. C) A man is defined by his vert acts. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) None of these. B) Excess of force C) Violent strike D) Praeter intentionem
A) Negligence B) Imprudence C) Lack of foresight. D) Clumsiness
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense is illegal. B) Such defense will exonerate X. C) None of these. D) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Parricide because the victim was his own father. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. D) None of these.
A) Culpa B) Imprudence C) Omission D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Proximate cause C) Motive D) Intent
A) Motive B) Prejudice C) Intent D) Bias
A) Mistake victim B) Mistake in the blow C) None of these. D) Mistake in the aim
A) Executive B) Judicial C) Political D) Legislative
A) Intelligence B) All of these. C) Freedom D) Intent
A) Act B) Fraud C) Intent D) Omission |