A) Act No. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) R.A. 3815 D) C.A. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) Presidential Decrees C) The Revised Penal Code D) Acts
A) P.D. No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) Com. Act No.
A) Law No. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) State power B) Power of eminent domain C) Police power D) Power of expropriation
A) Batas Blg. B) R.A. No. C) Act No. D) P.D. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1933 B) Jan. 1, 1932 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1930
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) None of these. B) It means that the law be just. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Empirical theory B) Tradition theory C) Classical theory D) Positivist theory
A) None of these. B) An occasional stay C) A temporary stay D) A fixed stay.
A) None of these. B) Cover up for a crime. C) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. D) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious.
A) Equal protection B) Bill of attainder C) Due process D) General application of laws
A) Traditional B) Territorial C) Jurisdctional D) Juristic
A) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. B) Punishment for someone being hated. C) Punishment to spite someone. D) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages.
A) Consuls B) Ambassadors C) Consultants D) Envoys
A) Traditional theory B) Positivist theory C) Classical theory D) Empirical theory
A) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) Expand the law or congressional act. D) None of these.
A) French rule B) English rule C) British rule D) American rule
A) Negligence B) Clumsiness C) Imprudence D) Felony
A) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. C) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions were negligent. B) All of these are correct. C) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. D) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target.
A) English rule B) American rule C) British rule D) Frech rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Probable felonies C) Mala in se D) Culpable felonies
A) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. B) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. C) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) European rule B) English rule C) American rule D) British rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of criminal intent C) Lack of intelligence D) Lack of freedom
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. B) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. C) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. D) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted.
A) Heinous crime B) Mala prohibita C) Mala in se D) Special crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. B) A man is defined by his vert acts. C) The act of a man defines him. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) Praeter intentionem B) Excess of force C) Violent strike D) None of these.
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Lack of foresight. D) Clumsiness
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) None of these. B) Such defense will not exonerate X. C) Such defense is illegal. D) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) None of these. C) Murder because the intended victim was A. D) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) Negligence B) Imprudence C) Omission D) Culpa
A) Mens rea B) Motive C) Intent D) Proximate cause
A) Motive B) Bias C) Intent D) Prejudice
A) None of these. B) Mistake in the aim C) Mistake in the blow D) Mistake victim
A) Legislative B) Executive C) Political D) Judicial
A) Intent B) All of these. C) Freedom D) Intelligence
A) Act B) Omission C) Fraud D) Intent |