A) C.A. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) Act No. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) The Revised Penal Code C) Acts D) Presidential Decrees
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No. C) Com. Act No. D) Act No.
A) P.D. No. B) Act No. C) Law No. D) R.A. No.
A) State power B) Power of eminent domain C) Police power D) Power of expropriation
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) Batas Blg.
A) Jan. 1, 1933 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1932 D) Jan. 1, 1931
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) It means that the law be just. B) It means that laws be lenient. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) None of these.
A) Classical theory B) Empirical theory C) Tradition theory D) Positivist theory
A) A temporary stay B) A fixed stay. C) None of these. D) An occasional stay
A) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. B) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. C) None of these. D) Cover up for a crime.
A) Due process B) Bill of attainder C) Equal protection D) General application of laws
A) Juristic B) Territorial C) Traditional D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Envoys B) Consultants C) Ambassadors D) Consuls
A) Empirical theory B) Positivist theory C) Traditional theory D) Classical theory
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) None of these. C) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) British rule B) American rule C) French rule D) English rule
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Clumsiness D) Felony
A) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. B) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines.
A) All of these are correct. B) No, because X and his companions were negligent. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock.
A) British rule B) English rule C) American rule D) Frech rule
A) Probable felonies B) Mala prohibita C) Mala in se D) Culpable felonies
A) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. D) Yes, because criminal law is territorial.
A) British rule B) American rule C) European rule D) English rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Lack of criminal intent B) Mistake of fact C) Lack of intelligence D) Lack of freedom
A) By the criminal tendency of a person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the prior acts of a person.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. C) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. D) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind.
A) Mala prohibita B) Heinous crime C) Mala in se D) Special crime
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. B) The act of a man defines him. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) A man is defined by his vert acts.
A) None of these. B) Praeter intentionem C) Violent strike D) Excess of force
A) Lack of foresight. B) Clumsiness C) Negligence D) Imprudence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) None of these. B) Such defense will exonerate X. C) Such defense will not exonerate X. D) Such defense is illegal.
A) None of these. B) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. C) Parricide because the victim was his own father. D) Murder because the intended victim was A.
A) Imprudence B) Culpa C) Negligence D) Omission
A) Motive B) Intent C) Mens rea D) Proximate cause
A) Prejudice B) Bias C) Motive D) Intent
A) Mistake in the aim B) Mistake victim C) Mistake in the blow D) None of these.
A) Legislative B) Executive C) Political D) Judicial
A) Freedom B) All of these. C) Intelligence D) Intent
A) Fraud B) Omission C) Intent D) Act |