A) P.D. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) C.A. 3815 D) Act No. 3815
A) Presidential Decrees B) The Revised Penal Code C) Republic Acts D) Acts
A) Act No. B) R.A. No. C) P.D. No. D) Com. Act No.
A) P.D. No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) Law No.
A) Power of eminent domain B) Power of expropriation C) Police power D) State power
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Batas Blg. D) R.A. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) None of these. B) It means that the law be just. C) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Empirical theory B) Tradition theory C) Positivist theory D) Classical theory
A) A fixed stay. B) A temporary stay C) None of these. D) An occasional stay
A) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. B) Cover up for a crime. C) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. D) None of these.
A) Bill of attainder B) Due process C) General application of laws D) Equal protection
A) Juristic B) Jurisdctional C) Territorial D) Traditional
A) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. B) Punishment for someone being hated. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Ambassadors B) Consuls C) Envoys D) Consultants
A) Empirical theory B) Traditional theory C) Positivist theory D) Classical theory
A) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) None of these. D) Expand the law or congressional act.
A) American rule B) French rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) Negligence B) Felony C) Clumsiness D) Imprudence
A) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. B) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) No, because X and his companions were negligent. D) All of these are correct.
A) English rule B) American rule C) British rule D) Frech rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Culpable felonies C) Mala in se D) Probable felonies
A) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) American rule B) British rule C) European rule D) English rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Municipal trial courts B) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed
A) Lack of freedom B) Lack of intelligence C) Mistake of fact D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the criminal mind of the person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the criminal tendency of a person. D) By the prior acts of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. B) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent.
A) Mala in se B) Heinous crime C) Mala prohibita D) Special crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. B) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. C) The act of a man defines him. D) A man is defined by his vert acts.
A) Violent strike B) Excess of force C) Praeter intentionem D) None of these.
A) Imprudence B) Clumsiness C) Negligence D) Lack of foresight.
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) All of these are correct. B) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita.
A) Such defense will not exonerate X. B) Such defense is illegal. C) None of these. D) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) None of these. B) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. C) Parricide because the victim was his own father. D) Murder because the intended victim was A.
A) Omission B) Negligence C) Culpa D) Imprudence
A) Intent B) Motive C) Mens rea D) Proximate cause
A) Bias B) Motive C) Intent D) Prejudice
A) None of these. B) Mistake in the aim C) Mistake victim D) Mistake in the blow
A) Executive B) Legislative C) Judicial D) Political
A) Freedom B) Intelligence C) All of these. D) Intent
A) Act B) Fraud C) Omission D) Intent |