A) C.A. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) R.A. 3815 D) Act No. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) Presidential Decrees C) Acts D) The Revised Penal Code
A) Com. Act No. B) R.A. No. C) Act No. D) P.D. No.
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Law No.
A) Power of expropriation B) Power of eminent domain C) State power D) Police power
A) R.A. No. B) Act No. C) P.D. No. D) Batas Blg.
A) Jan. 1, 1933 B) Jan. 1, 1932 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1930
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land. B) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law.
A) None of these. B) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. C) It means that the law be just. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Tradition theory B) Classical theory C) Empirical theory D) Positivist theory
A) A fixed stay. B) A temporary stay C) An occasional stay D) None of these.
A) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. B) None of these. C) Cover up for a crime. D) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime.
A) Bill of attainder B) Equal protection C) Due process D) General application of laws
A) Juristic B) Traditional C) Territorial D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. D) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.
A) Envoys B) Consultants C) Ambassadors D) Consuls
A) Positivist theory B) Empirical theory C) Traditional theory D) Classical theory
A) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. B) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). C) Expand the law or congressional act. D) None of these.
A) American rule B) English rule C) French rule D) British rule
A) Felony B) Imprudence C) Negligence D) Clumsiness
A) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. C) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. B) All of these are correct. C) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) American rule B) British rule C) English rule D) Frech rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Culpable felonies C) Mala in se D) Probable felonies
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. C) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. D) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country.
A) American rule B) European rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) French rule B) English rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Lack of freedom B) Lack of intelligence C) Mistake of fact D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the criminal mind of the person. C) By the overt acts of a person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Mala prohibita B) Mala in se C) Special crime D) Heinous crime
A) No moral liability. B) Not criminally liable.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. B) The act of a man defines him. C) A man is defined by his vert acts. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) Excess of force B) Violent strike C) None of these. D) Praeter intentionem
A) Lack of foresight. B) Clumsiness C) Negligence D) Imprudence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense is illegal. B) Such defense will exonerate X. C) None of these. D) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) Parricide because the victim was his own father. D) None of these.
A) Negligence B) Culpa C) Imprudence D) Omission
A) Intent B) Proximate cause C) Mens rea D) Motive
A) Intent B) Motive C) Prejudice D) Bias
A) None of these. B) Mistake in the aim C) Mistake victim D) Mistake in the blow
A) Legislative B) Executive C) Judicial D) Political
A) Intelligence B) Intent C) All of these. D) Freedom
A) Intent B) Fraud C) Act D) Omission |