A) Act No. 3815 B) P.D. 3815 C) C.A. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) Presidential Decrees C) The Revised Penal Code D) Acts
A) Com. Act No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) P.D. No.
A) Act No. B) Law No. C) P.D. No. D) R.A. No.
A) Power of expropriation B) Police power C) Power of eminent domain D) State power
A) R.A. No. B) Batas Blg. C) Act No. D) P.D. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1931 B) Jan. 1, 1933 C) Jan. 1, 1932 D) Jan. 1, 1930
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. B) It means that the law be just. C) None of these. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Positivist theory B) Tradition theory C) Empirical theory D) Classical theory
A) None of these. B) An occasional stay C) A fixed stay. D) A temporary stay
A) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. B) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. C) None of these. D) Cover up for a crime.
A) Due process B) General application of laws C) Equal protection D) Bill of attainder
A) Territorial B) Juristic C) Traditional D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. B) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Consuls B) Envoys C) Consultants D) Ambassadors
A) Classical theory B) Traditional theory C) Empirical theory D) Positivist theory
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. C) None of these. D) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act).
A) American rule B) French rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) Clumsiness B) Felony C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. B) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions were negligent. B) All of these are correct. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock.
A) Frech rule B) American rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) Probable felonies B) Mala prohibita C) Culpable felonies D) Mala in se
A) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. B) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. C) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. D) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines.
A) American rule B) European rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of criminal intent C) Lack of freedom D) Lack of intelligence
A) By the prior acts of a person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Special crime B) Mala in se C) Heinous crime D) Mala prohibita
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) A man is defined by his vert acts. B) The act of a man defines him. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) Violent strike B) None of these. C) Praeter intentionem D) Excess of force
A) Imprudence B) Clumsiness C) Lack of foresight. D) Negligence
A) Intent B) Mens rea
A) True in all cases. B) True
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) None of these. B) Such defense is illegal. C) Such defense will not exonerate X. D) Such defense will exonerate X.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) Parricide because the victim was his own father. C) Murder because the intended victim was A. D) None of these.
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Culpa D) Omission
A) Intent B) Proximate cause C) Motive D) Mens rea
A) Prejudice B) Bias C) Intent D) Motive
A) Mistake victim B) Mistake in the aim C) Mistake in the blow D) None of these.
A) Political B) Judicial C) Executive D) Legislative
A) Intelligence B) Intent C) All of these. D) Freedom
A) Intent B) Fraud C) Act D) Omission |